Download PDF
J Reconstr Microsurg 2015; 31(04): 277-282
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1396754
Original Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Free Lateral Great Toe Flap for the Reconstruction of Finger Pulp Defects

Huaiyuan Zheng
1   Department of Hand Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
2   Department of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
,
Juan Liu
1   Department of Hand Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
,
Xinyi Dai
2   Department of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
,
Hans-Günther Machens
2   Department of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
,
Arndt F. Schilling
2   Department of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

12 June 2014

11 October 2014

Publication Date:
28 January 2015 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Introduction The aim of this study was to evaluate the esthetic and sensory outcomes after reconstruction of finger pulp defects with free toe flaps from the lateral aspect of the great toe.

Methods From June 2006 to October 2011, we performed 48 free toe pulp transfers for finger pulp reconstruction in 43 patients; 18 male and 25 female patients with a mean age of 31.8 years (range, 16–47 years). Six patients suffered multiple digital pulp defects and five received two synchronous pulp transfers. The defects involved 20 thumbs, 15 index fingers, 10 long fingers, and 4 ring fingers, and flap size ranged from 24 × 18 to 55 × 30 mm. Follow-up evaluation included the functional and esthetic outcomes of the reconstructed pulps and donor toes.

Results All but one flap survived completely. Overall, 32 cases (35 pulp flaps) were followed for more than 1 year (range, 12–48 months; average, 22.8 months). The Semmes–Weinstein sensitivity score was 2.83 to 4.74 at the flaps and the mean static two-point discrimination was 6.17 mm (range, 3–10 mm). A total of 13 patients (40.6%) experienced mild (10 cases) to moderate (3 cases) cold intolerance, and 1 patient (3.1%) suffered severe cold intolerance. According to the Michigan Hand Outcome Questionnaire the mean esthetic appearance score was 16 (range, 12–19).

Conclusion The free neurovascular great toe pulp flap is an efficient and reliable flap for the reconstruction of finger pulp defects.

Keywords

free pulp flap - finger pulp defect - great toe
 

  • References

  • 1 Buncke HJ, Rose EH. Free toe-to-fingertip neurovascular flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 1979; 63 (5) 607-612
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Irwin MS, Gilbert SE, Terenghi G, Smith RW, Green CJ. Cold intolerance following peripheral nerve injury. Natural history and factors predicting severity of symptoms. J Hand Surg [Br] 1997; 22 (3) 308-316
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Chung KC, Pillsbury MS, Walters MR, Hayward RA. Reliability and validity testing of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire. J Hand Surg Am 1998; 23 (4) 575-587
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Sohn WI, Jung SN, Kim SW, Kwon H, Im KS. Reconstruction of fingertip defects with great toe pulp grafts. Ann Plast Surg 2012; 68 (6) 579-582
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Ratcliffe RJ, McGrouther DA. Free toe pulp transfer in thumb reconstruction. Experience in the West of Scotland Regional Plastic Surgery Unit. J Hand Surg [Br] 1991; 16 (2) 165-168
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Okazaki M, Hasegawa H, Kano M, Kurashina R. A different method of fingertip reconstruction with the thenar flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 2005; 115 (3) 885-888 , discussion 889–890
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Cohen BE, Cronin ED. An innervated cross-finger flap for fingertip reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 1983; 72 (5) 688-697
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Huang YC, Liu Y, Chen TH. Use of homodigital reverse island flaps for distal digital reconstruction. J Trauma 2010; 68 (2) 429-433
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Liu J, Zheng H. Free distal ulnar artery perforator flaps for the reconstruction of a volar defect in fingers. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2014; 67 (11) 1557-1563
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Huang SH, Wu SH, Lai CH , et al. Free medial plantar artery perforator flap for finger pulp reconstruction: report of a series of 10 cases. Microsurgery 2010; 30 (2) 118-124
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Simsek T, Engin MS, Aslan O, Neimetzade T, Eroglu L. Finger pulp reconstruction with free dorsoulnar artery perforator (DUAP) flap. J Reconstr Microsurg 2011; 27 (9) 543-549
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Yang JW, Kim JS, Lee DC , et al. The radial artery superficial palmar branch flap: a modified free thenar flap with constant innervation. J Reconstr Microsurg 2010; 26 (8) 529-538
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Ishiko T, Nakaima N, Suzuki S. Free posterior interosseous artery perforator flap for finger reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2009; 62 (7) e211-e215
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Sakai S. Free flap from the flexor aspect of the wrist for resurfacing defects of the hand and fingers. Plast Reconstr Surg 2003; 111 (4) 1412-1420 , discussion 1421–1422
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Yan H, Zhang F, Akdemir O , et al. Clinical applications of venous flaps in the reconstruction of hands and fingers. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2011; 131 (1) 65-74
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Wang L, Fu J, Li M, Han D, Yang L. Repair of hand defects by transfer of free tissue flaps from toes. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2013; 133 (1) 141-146
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Kato H, Ogino T, Minami A, Usui M. Restoration of sensibility in fingers repaired with free sensory flaps from the toe. J Hand Surg Am 1989; 14 (1) 49-54
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Lee DC, Kim JS, Ki SH, Roh SY, Yang JW, Chung KC. Partial second toe pulp free flap for fingertip reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008; 121 (3) 899-907
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Sun W, Wang Z, Qiu S , et al. Communicating branch of toe web veins as a venous return pathway in free toe pulp flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010; 126 (5) 268e-269e
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Maire N, Naito K, Lequint T, Facca S, Berner S, Liverneaux P. Robot-assisted free toe pulp transfer: feasibility study. J Reconstr Microsurg 2012; 28 (7) 481-484
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Morrison WA, O'Brien B, Hamilton RB. Neurovascular free foot flaps in reconstruction of the mutilated hand. Clin Plast Surg 1978; 5 (2) 265-272
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Dellon AL, Curtis RM, Edgerton MT. Reeducation of sensation in the hand after nerve injury and repair. Plast Reconstr Surg 1974; 53 (3) 297-305
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Wei FC, Carver N, Lee YH, Chuang DC, Cheng SL. Sensory recovery and Meissner corpuscle number after toe-to-hand transplantation. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000; 105 (7) 2405-2411
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Lin CH, Lin YT, Sassu P, Lin CH, Wei FC. Functional assessment of the reconstructed fingertips after free toe pulp transfer. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 120 (5) 1315-1321
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Gu JX, Pan JB, Liu HJ , et al. Aesthetic and sensory reconstruction of finger pulp defects using free toe flaps. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2014; 38 (1) 156-163
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar