Download PDF
Am J Perinatol 2015; 32(06): 515-522
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1396699
Original Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Neonatal Outcomes in Very Preterm Singleton Infants Conceived Using Assisted Reproductive Technologies

Laura Chiarelli
1   Maternal-Infant Care Research Centre, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
,
Lucia Mirea
1   Maternal-Infant Care Research Centre, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
2   Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
,
Junmin Yang
1   Maternal-Infant Care Research Centre, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
,
Shoo K. Lee
1   Maternal-Infant Care Research Centre, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
3   Department of Paediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
,
Prakesh S. Shah
1   Maternal-Infant Care Research Centre, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
3   Department of Paediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
,
; on behalf of the Canadian Neonatal Network › Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

21 August 2014

08 October 2014

Publication Date:
24 December 2014 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Objective To compare neonatal mortality, severe morbidities and hospital length of stay in very preterm singleton infants conceived using assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs) or spontaneously (SP).

Study Design Singleton infants born at 23 to 32 weeks gestation during 2010–2012 were retrospectively identified from the Canadian Neonatal Network database. A composite outcome indicating a mortality or severe morbidity (grade ≥ 3 intraventricular hemorrhage, periventricular leukomalacia, stage ≥ 3 retinopathy of prematurity, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, or stage ≥ 2 necrotizing enterocolitis) was compared between ART and SP infants using multivariable logistic regression. Length of stay was examined in multivariable time-to-event analyses adjusting for competing risk of mortality.

Results Eligible subjects included 346 (4.4%) ART and 7,578 (95.6%) SP infants. ART mothers were older, with fewer single parents, higher rates of nulliparity, diabetes, hypertension, antenatal corticosteroids, and prenatal care, but less smoking and substance use than SP mothers. No significant differences were detected in the composite outcome (odds ratio: 0.79; 95% confidence interval: 0.54–1.17) or length of stay (hazard ratio: 0.84; 95% confidence interval: 0.63–1.12) between ART and SP infants after adjustment for potential confounders and risk factors.

Conclusion Among singleton infants born very preterm, mode of conception is not associated with overall mortality/morbidity or length of stay.

Keywords

fertility - mode of conception - singleton gestation - mortality - morbidities of prematurity
 

  • References

  • 1 Gunby J, Bissonnette F, Librach C, Cowan L ; IVF Directors Group of the Canadian Fertility and Andrology Society. Assisted reproductive technologies (ART) in Canada: 2006 results from the Canadian ART Register. Fertil Steril 2010; 93 (7) 2189-2201
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Cook JL, Collins J, Buckett W, Racowsky C, Hughes E, Jarvi K. Assisted reproductive technology-related multiple births: Canada in an international context. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2011; 33 (2) 159-167
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Helmerhorst FM, Perquin DA, Donker D, Keirse MJ. Perinatal outcome of singletons and twins after assisted conception: a systematic review of controlled studies. BMJ 2004; 328 (7434) 261
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Jackson RA, Gibson KA, Wu YW, Croughan MS. Perinatal outcomes in singletons following in vitro fertilization: a meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 2004; 103 (3) 551-563
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Vélez MP, Kadoch IJ, Phillips SJ, Bissonnette F. Rapid policy change to single-embryo transfer while maintaining pregnancy rates per initiated cycle. Reprod Biomed Online 2013; 26 (5) 506-511
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Grady R, Alavi N, Vale R, Khandwala M, McDonald SD. Elective single embryo transfer and perinatal outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril 2012; 97 (2) 324-331
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 McDonald SD, Han Z, Mulla S, Ohlsson A, Beyene J, Murphy KE ; Knowledge Synthesis Group. Preterm birth and low birth weight among in vitro fertilization twins: a systematic review and meta-analyses. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2010; 148 (2) 105-113
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Ericson A, Nygren KG, Olausson PO, Källén B. Hospital care utilization of infants born after IVF. Hum Reprod 2002; 17 (4) 929-932
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Hansen M, Colvin L, Petterson B, Kurinczuk JJ, de Klerk N, Bower C. Admission to hospital of singleton children born following assisted reproductive technology (ART). Hum Reprod 2008; 23 (6) 1297-1305
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Messerschmidt A, Olischar M, Birnbacher R, Weber M, Pollak A, Leitich H. Perinatal outcome of preterm infants <1500 g after IVF pregnancies compared with natural conception. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2010; 95 (3) F225-F229
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Chan RV, Yonekawa Y, Morrison MA , et al. Association between assisted reproductive technology and advanced retinopathy of prematurity. Clin Ophthalmol 2010; 4: 1385-1390
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Friling R, Axer-Siegel R, Hersocovici Z, Weinberger D, Sirota L, Snir M. Retinopathy of prematurity in assisted versus natural conception and singleton versus multiple births. Ophthalmology 2007; 114 (2) 321-324
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Linder N, Haskin O, Levit O , et al. Risk factors for intraventricular hemorrhage in very low birth weight premature infants: a retrospective case-control study. Pediatrics 2003; 111 (5 Pt 1) e590-e595
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Stewart JE, Allred EN, Collins M , et al. Risk of cranial ultrasound abnormalities in very-low-birth-weight infants conceived with assisted reproductive techniques. J Perinatol 2002; 22 (1) 37-45
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Schimmel MS, Hammerman C, Lusky A, Reichman B. Very low-birth-weight-infants conceived by in vitro fertilization are not at higher risk for mortality and morbidity: a population-based study. Fertil Steril 2006; 85 (4) 907-912
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Canadian Neonatal Network. Abstractor's Manual. Available at: http://www.canadianneonatalnetwork.org/portal/CNNHome/Publications.aspx . Accessed July 1, 2014
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Papile LA, Burstein J, Burstein R, Koffler H. Incidence and evolution of subependymal and intraventricular hemorrhage: a study of infants with birth weights less than 1,500 gm. J Pediatr 1978; 92 (4) 529-534
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Synnes AR, Chien LY, Peliowski A, Baboolal R, Lee SK ; Canadian NICU Network. Variations in intraventricular hemorrhage incidence rates among Canadian neonatal intensive care units. J Pediatr 2001; 138 (4) 525-531
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 International Committee for the Classification of Retinopathy of Prematurity. The International Classification of Retinopathy of Prematurity revisited. Arch Ophthalmol 2005; 123 (7) 991-999
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Shennan AT, Dunn MS, Ohlsson A, Lennox K, Hoskins EM. Abnormal pulmonary outcomes in premature infants: prediction from oxygen requirement in the neonatal period. Pediatrics 1988; 82 (4) 527-532
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Bell MJ, Ternberg JL, Feigin RD , et al. Neonatal necrotizing enterocolitis. Therapeutic decisions based upon clinical staging. Ann Surg 1978; 187 (1) 1-7
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Walsh MC, Kliegman RM. Necrotizing enterocolitis: treatment based on staging criteria. Pediatr Clin North Am 1986; 33 (1) 179-201
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Kramer MS, Platt RW, Wen SW , et al; Fetal/Infant Health Study Group of the Canadian Perinatal Surveillance System. A new and improved population-based Canadian reference for birth weight for gestational age. Pediatrics 2001; 108 (2) E35
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Richardson DK, Corcoran JD, Escobar GJ, Lee SK. SNAP-II and SNAPPE-II: Simplified newborn illness severity and mortality risk scores. J Pediatr 2001; 138 (1) 92-100
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Fine JP, Gray RJ. A proportional hazards model for the subdistribution of a competing risk. J Am Stat Assoc 1999; 94: 496-509
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Gray B. cmprsk: Subdistribution analysis of competing risks. R package. Version 2.2–6. 2013. Available at: http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=cmprsk . Accessed 1 August, 2014
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Picaud JC, Chalies S, Combes C, Mercier G, Dechaud H, Cambonie G. Neonatal mortality and morbidity in preterm infants born from assisted reproductive technologies. Acta Paediatr 2012; 101 (8) 846-851
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Mirea L, Yang J, Paterson AD , et al; Canadian Neonatal Network. Relationship of mode of conception and sex concordance with mortality/morbidity in preterm twins. Twin Res Hum Genet 2013; 16 (5) 985-993
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 D'Angelo DV, Whitehead N, Helms K, Barfield W, Ahluwalia IB. Birth outcomes of intended pregnancies among women who used assisted reproductive technology, ovulation stimulation, or no treatment. Fertil Steril 2011; 96 (2) 314-320.e2
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Hintz SR, Bann CM, Ambalavanan N, Cotten CM, Das A, Higgins RD ; Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network. Predicting time to hospital discharge for extremely preterm infants. Pediatrics 2010; 125 (1) e146-e154
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Fedorov V, Mannino F, Zhang R. Consequences of dichotomization. Pharm Stat 2009; 8 (1) 50-61
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 MacCallum RC, Zhang S, Preacher KJ, Rucker DD. On the practice of dichotomization of quantitative variables. Psychol Methods 2002; 7 (1) 19-40
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Klein JP, Moeschberger ML. Survival Analysis: Techniques for censored and truncated data. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Springer; 2003: 393-417
    Google Scholar
  • 34 Kaplan EL, Meier P. Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc 1958; 53: 457-481
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Cox DR. Regression models and life-tables. J R Stat Soc Series B (Stat Methodol) 1972; 34: 187-220
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Brock GN, Barnes C, Ramirez JA, Myers J. How to handle mortality when investigating length of hospital stay and time to clinical stability. BMC Med Res Methodol 2011; 11: 144
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Turker G, Doger E, Arısoy AE, Günlemez A, Gökalp AS. The effect of IVF pregnancies on mortality and morbidity in tertiary unit. Ital J Pediatr 2013; 39: 17
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Williams C, Sutcliffe A. Infant outcomes of assisted reproduction. Early Hum Dev 2009; 85 (11) 673-677
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Badawy A, Shokeir T, Allam AF, Abdelhady H. Pregnancy outcome after ovulation induction with aromatase inhibitors or clomiphene citrate in unexplained infertility. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2009; 88 (2) 187-191
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Tulandi T, Martin J, Al-Fadhli R , et al. Congenital malformations among 911 newborns conceived after infertility treatment with letrozole or clomiphene citrate. Fertil Steril 2006; 85 (6) 1761-1765
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Armstrong A, Plowden TC. Ethnicity and assisted reproductive technologies. Clin Pract (Lond) 2012; 9 (6) 651-658
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Claydon JE, Mitton C, Sankaran K, Lee SK ; Canadian Neonatal Network. Ethnic differences in risk factors for neonatal mortality and morbidity in the neonatal intensive care unit. J Perinatol 2007; 27 (7) 448-452
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar