J Knee Surg 2015; 28(02): 113-118
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1396081
Special Focus Section
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Evaluation of the Painful Total Knee Arthroplasty

Robert Cercek
1   Division of Adult Reconstruction, The CORE Institute, Center for Orthopaedic Research and Education, Phoenix, Arizona
,
Richard Bassett
1   Division of Adult Reconstruction, The CORE Institute, Center for Orthopaedic Research and Education, Phoenix, Arizona
,
Steve Myerthall
1   Division of Adult Reconstruction, The CORE Institute, Center for Orthopaedic Research and Education, Phoenix, Arizona
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

21 September 2014

23 October 2014

Publication Date:
24 November 2014 (online)

Abstract

There are a substantial number of patients who continue to complain of pain following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). There are many potential causes of continued pain, and these are broadly categorized into intrinsic and extrinsic sources. When evaluating a patient with a painful TKA, the physician begins with a thorough history and physical examination, along with the appropriate radiographs. Further workup includes laboratory analysis, specifically evaluating the inflammatory markers erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein, along with a synovial fluid aspirate evaluating the white blood cell count with differential and culture. Advanced imaging modalities are sometimes helpful when the diagnosis remains unclear, including stress radiographs, live fluoroscopic imaging, ultrasound, nuclear imaging, and magnetic resonance imaging. Further surgery is not advisable without a clear diagnosis, as this is associated with very poor results. Instead, serial follow-up or a referral to a specialist for a second opinion may be most appropriate.

 
  • References

  • 1 Cram P, Lu X, Kates SL, Singh JA, Li Y, Wolf BR. Total knee arthroplasty volume, utilization, and outcomes among Medicare beneficiaries, 1991-2010. JAMA 2012; 308 (12) 1227-1236
  • 2 Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E, Mowat F, Halpern M. Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007; 89 (4) 780-785
  • 3 Bourne RB, Chesworth BM, Davis AM, Mahomed NN, Charron KD. Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty: who is satisfied and who is not?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010; 468 (1) 57-63
  • 4 Culliton SE, Bryant DM, Overend TJ, MacDonald SJ, Chesworth BM. The relationship between expectations and satisfaction in patients undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2012; 27 (3) 490-492
  • 5 Nilsdotter AK, Toksvig-Larsen S, Roos EM. Knee arthroplasty: are patients' expectations fulfilled? A prospective study of pain and function in 102 patients with 5-year follow-up. Acta Orthop 2009; 80 (1) 55-61
  • 6 Noble PC, Conditt MA, Cook KF, Mathis KB. The John Insall Award: Patient expectations affect satisfaction with total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006; 452 (452) 35-43
  • 7 Anderson JG, Wixson RL, Tsai D, Stulberg SD, Chang RW. Functional outcome and patient satisfaction in total knee patients over the age of 75. J Arthroplasty 1996; 11 (7) 831-840
  • 8 Dunbar MJ, Robertsson O, Ryd L, Lidgren L. Appropriate questionnaires for knee arthroplasty. Results of a survey of 3600 patients from The Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Registry. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2001; 83 (3) 339-344
  • 9 Hawker G, Wright J, Coyte P , et al. Health-related quality of life after knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1998; 80 (2) 163-173
  • 10 Heck DA, Robinson RL, Partridge CM, Lubitz RM, Freund DA. Patient outcomes after knee replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1998; (356) 93-110
  • 11 Jacobs CA, Christensen CP. Factors influencing patient satisfaction two to five years after primary total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2014; 29 (6) 1189-1191
  • 12 Baker PN, van der Meulen JH, Lewsey J, Gregg PJ ; National Joint Registry for England and Wales; Data from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales. The role of pain and function in determining patient satisfaction after total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2007; 89 (7) 893-900
  • 13 Chesworth BM, Mahomed NN, Bourne RB, Davis AM ; OJRR Study Group. Willingness to go through surgery again validated the WOMAC clinically important difference from THR/TKR surgery. J Clin Epidemiol 2008; 61 (9) 907-918
  • 14 Jorn LP, Johnsson R, Toksvig-Larsen S. Patient satisfaction, function and return to work after knee arthroplasty. Acta Orthop Scand 1999; 70 (4) 343-347
  • 15 Robertsson O, Dunbar M, Pehrsson T, Knutson K, Lidgren L. Patient satisfaction after knee arthroplasty: a report on 27,372 knees operated on between 1981 and 1995 in Sweden. Acta Orthop Scand 2000; 71 (3) 262-267
  • 16 Clarke HD, Scuderi GR. Flexion instability in primary total knee replacement. J Knee Surg 2003; 16 (2) 123-128
  • 17 Peralta-Molero JV, Gladnick BP, Lee YY, Ferrer AV, Lyman S, González Della Valle A. Patellofemoral crepitation and clunk following modern, fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2014; 29 (3) 535-540
  • 18 Dennis DA, Kim RH, Johnson DR, Springer BD, Fehring TK, Sharma A. The John Insall Award: control-matched evaluation of painful patellar Crepitus after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2011; 469 (1) 10-17
  • 19 Reish TG, Clarke HD, Scuderi GR, Math KR, Scott WN. Use of multi-detector computed tomography for the detection of periprosthetic osteolysis in total knee arthroplasty. J Knee Surg 2006; 19 (4) 259-264
  • 20 Berger RA, Crossett LS, Jacobs JJ, Rubash HE. Malrotation causing patellofemoral complications after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1998; (356) 144-153
  • 21 Hofmann AA, Wyatt RW, Daniels AU, Armstrong L, Alazraki N, Taylor Jr A. Bone scans after total knee arthroplasty in asymptomatic patients. Cemented versus cementless. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1990; (251) 183-188
  • 22 Rand JA, Brown ML. The value of indium 111 leukocyte scanning in the evaluation of painful or infected total knee arthroplasties. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1990; (259) 179-182
  • 23 Scher DM, Pak K, Lonner JH, Finkel JE, Zuckerman JD, Di Cesare PE. The predictive value of indium-111 leukocyte scans in the diagnosis of infected total hip, knee, or resection arthroplasties. J Arthroplasty 2000; 15 (3) 295-300
  • 24 Basu S, Kwee TC, Saboury B , et al. FDG PET for diagnosing infection in hip and knee prostheses: prospective study in 221 prostheses and subgroup comparison with combined (111)In-labeled leukocyte/(99m)Tc-sulfur colloid bone marrow imaging in 88 prostheses. Clin Nucl Med 2014; 39 (7) 609-615
  • 25 Jämsen E, Huhtala H, Puolakka T, Moilanen T. Risk factors for infection after knee arthroplasty. A register-based analysis of 43,149 cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2009; 91 (1) 38-47
  • 26 Della Valle CJ, Sporer SM, Jacobs JJ, Berger RA, Rosenberg AG, Paprosky WG. Preoperative testing for sepsis before revision total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2007; 22 (6) (Suppl. 02) 90-93
  • 27 Ghanem E, Parvizi J, Burnett RS , et al. Cell count and differential of aspirated fluid in the diagnosis of infection at the site of total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008; 90 (8) 1637-1643
  • 28 Della Valle C, Parvizi J, Bauer TW , et al; American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infections of the hip and knee. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2010; 18 (12) 760-770
  • 29 Bedair H, Ting N, Jacovides C , et al. The Mark Coventry Award: diagnosis of early postoperative TKA infection using synovial fluid analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2011; 469 (1) 34-40
  • 30 Sharkey PF, Lichstein PM, Shen C, Tokarski AT, Parvizi J. Why are total knee arthroplasties failing today—has anything changed after 10 years?. J Arthroplasty 2014; 29 (9) 1774-1778
  • 31 Schroer WC, Berend KR, Lombardi AV , et al. Why are total knees failing today? Etiology of total knee revision in 2010 and 2011. J Arthroplasty 2013; 28 (8, Suppl): 116-119
  • 32 Sharkey PF, Hozack WJ, Rothman RH, Shastri S, Jacoby SM. Insall Award paper. Why are total knee arthroplasties failing today?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2002; (404) 7-13
  • 33 Parvizi J, Mortazavi SM, Devulapalli C, Hozack WJ, Sharkey PF, Rothman RH. Secondary resurfacing of the patella after primary total knee arthroplasty does the anterior knee pain resolve?. J Arthroplasty 2012; 27 (1) 21-26
  • 34 Nikolaus OB, Larson DR, Hanssen AD, Trousdale RT, Sierra RJ. Lateral patellar facet impingement after primary total knee arthroplasty: it does exist. J Arthroplasty 2014; 29 (5) 970-976
  • 35 Costanzo JA, Aynardi MC, Peters JD, Kopolovich DM, Purtill JJ. Patellar clunk syndrome after total knee arthroplasty; risk factors and functional outcomes of arthroscopic treatment. J Arthroplasty 2014; 29 (9, Suppl): 201-204
  • 36 Noiseux NO, Callaghan JJ, Clark CR, Zimmerman MB, Sluka KA, Rakel BA. Preoperative predictors of pain following total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2014; 29 (7) 1383-1387
  • 37 Feeney SL. The relationship between pain and negative affect in older adults: anxiety as a predictor of pain. J Anxiety Disord 2004; 18 (6) 733-744
  • 38 Brander V, Gondek S, Martin E, Stulberg SD. Pain and depression influence outcome 5 years after knee replacement surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2007; 464 (464) 21-26