Superficial Temporal Artery and Vein as Recipient Vessels for Scalp and Facial Reconstruction: Radiographic Support for Underused Vessels

Abstract

Background The choice of the recipient vessels for microsurgical reconstruction is based on proximity to the defect, vessel caliber, anatomic reliability, and ease of dissection. Traditionally in head and neck reconstruction, the superficial temporal artery and vein (STA/V) have been reserved as secondary recipient vessels. Others, including the facial artery (FA) and vein have been the preferred choice for facial reconstruction.

Methods A retrospective analysis of all consecutive head and neck reconstructions using the STA/V by the senior author (E.S.G.) over a 5-year period was performed. Perioperative data were reviewed for all the patients. In a subset of patients, radiographic analysis was used to delineate STA and FA anatomy including vessel diameter and distances to standard anatomic landmarks.

Results A total of 31 patients had 32 microsurgical reconstructions using the STA/V as recipient vessels. Radiographic analysis revealed no significant difference between the STA and FA diameters. The distances from the STA to the upper and middle face were significantly shorter relative to the FA, 64 versus 102 mm (p < 0.0001) and 72 versus 80 mm (p < 0.04), respectively. The distances from the lower face to the STA and FA were 56 and 30 mm, respectively (p < 0.0001).

Conclusions The STA/V can be used as first choice recipient vessels in head and neck reconstruction. Key features of these vessels include proximity to defect, acceptable caliber, predictable anatomic location, and relative ease of dissection. We recommend that the STA/V be considered recipient vessels of choice for reconstruction of defects of the face and scalp.

Keywords

head and neck reconstruction - superficial temporal artery - recipient vessels

• References

• 1 Chia HL, Wong CH, Tan BK, Tan KC, Ong YS. An algorithm for recipient vessel selection in microsurgical head and neck reconstruction. J Reconstr Microsurg 2011; 27 (1) 47-56
• 2 Nahabedian MY, Singh N, Deune EG, Silverman R, Tufaro AP. Recipient vessel analysis for microvascular reconstruction of the head and neck. Ann Plast Surg 2004; 52 (2) 148-155 , discussion 156–157
• 3 Head C, Sercarz JA, Abemayor E, Calcaterra TC, Rawnsley JD, Blackwell KE. Microvascular reconstruction after previous neck dissection. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2002; 128 (3) 328-331
• 4 Hidalgo DA, Disa JJ, Cordeiro PG, Hu QY. A review of 716 consecutive free flaps for oncologic surgical defects: refinement in donor-site selection and technique. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998; 102 (3) 722-732 , discussion 733–734
• 5 Cordeiro PG, Disa JJ. Challenges in midface reconstruction. Semin Surg Oncol 2000; 19 (3) 218-225
• 6 Shimizu F, Lin MP, Ellabban M, Evans GR, Cheng MH. Superficial temporal vessels as a reserve recipient site for microvascular head and neck reconstruction in vessel-depleted neck. Ann Plast Surg 2009; 62 (2) 134-138
• 7 Hansen SL, Foster RD, Dosanjh AS, Mathes SJ, Hoffman WY, Leon P. Superficial temporal artery and vein as recipient vessels for facial and scalp microsurgical reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 120 (7) 1879-1884
• 8 Halvorson EG, Cordeiro PG, Disa JJ, Wallin EF, Mehrara BJ. Superficial temporal recipient vessels in microvascular orbit and scalp reconstruction of oncologic defects. J Reconstr Microsurg 2009; 25 (6) 383-387
• 9 Pinar YA, Govsa F. Anatomy of the superficial temporal artery and its branches: its importance for surgery. Surg Radiol Anat 2006; 28 (3) 248-253
• 10 Stock AL, Collins HP, Davidson TM. Anatomy of the superficial temporal artery. Head Neck Surg 1980; 2 (6) 466-469
• 11 Yano T, Tanaka K, Iida H, Kishimoto S, Okazaki M. Usability of the middle temporal vein as a recipient vessel for free tissue transfer in skull-base reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 2012; 68 (3) 286-289
• 12 Chen TH, Chen CH, Shyu JF, Wu CW, Lui WY, Liu JC. Distribution of the superficial temporal artery in the Chinese adult. Plast Reconstr Surg 1999; 104 (5) 1276-1279
• 13 Tayfur V, Edizer M, Magden O. Anatomic bases of superficial temporal artery and temporal branch of facial nerve. J Craniofac Surg 2010; 21 (6) 1945-1947
• 14 Magden O, Edizer M, Tayfur V, Atabey A. Anatomic study of the vasculature of the submental artery flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004; 114 (7) 1719-1723
• 15 Pinar YA, Bilge O, Govsa F. Anatomic study of the blood supply of perioral region. Clin Anat 2005; 18 (5) 330-339
• 16 Hussussian CJ, Reece GP. Microsurgical scalp reconstruction in the patient with cancer. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002; 109 (6) 1828-1834
• 17 Park C, Lew DH, Yoo WM. An analysis of 123 temporoparietal fascial flaps: anatomic and clinical considerations in total auricular reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 1999; 104 (5) 1295-1306
• 18 Moran SL. Temporoparietal fascia flap. In: Wei FC, Mardini S, , eds. Flaps and Reconstructive Surgery. 1 ed. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier-Saunder; 2009: 159
• 19 Zhang T, Lubek J, Salama A , et al. Venous anastomoses using microvascular coupler in free flap head and neck reconstruction. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2012; 70 (4) 992-996