Download PDF
Gefäßmedizin Scan - Zeitschrift für Angiologie, Gefäßchirurgie, diagnostische und interventionelle Radiologie 2015; 02(01): 53-70
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1391444
Fortbildung
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Das abdominale Aortenaneurysma

Teil I: Diagnostik
C.-A. Behrendt
,
H. C. Rieß
,
F. Heidemann
,
T. Kölbel
,
R. T. Grundmann
,
E. S. Debus
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
17 February 2015 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints
Fazit

Das AAA hat eine Gesamtprävalenz von ca. 4 – 8% der über 65-jährigen Männer und von 0,5 – 1,5 % der über 65-jährigen Frauen. Es ist eine multifaktorielle Erkrankung, bei der Entzündungs- und Degenerationsprozesse vor allem in der Media und Adventitia der Aorta sowie Matrixmetalloproteinasen eine entscheidende Rolle spielen.

Den ausschlaggebenden Risikofaktor für die Entstehung und die rasche Progredienz des AAA stellt das Rauschen dar.

Das Screening auf AAA kann nachweislich das Langzeitüberleben bestimmter Risikogruppen verbessern. Besondere Risikogruppen sind vor allem männliche Raucher über 65 Jahren. Für Frauen steht der Nachweis eines generellen Nutzens des Aorten-Screenings noch aus.

Die Spiral-CTA gilt aufgrund der hohen Auflösung weiterhin als Goldstandard für die EVAR-Planung. Besondere Beachtung erfordern vor allem kontrastmittelassoziierte Komplikationen.

Die farbkodierte Duplexsonografie stellt bei Verwendung einer Kontrastmittelverstärkung eine valide Alternative bei der Suche nach Endoleckagen nach EVAR dar.

 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Eckstein HH, Böckler D, Flessenkämper I et al. Ultrasonographic screening for the detection of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2009; 106: 657-663
    Google Scholar
  • 2 Powell JT, Hinchliffe RJ. IMPROVE trial investigators et al. Observations from the IMPROVE trial concerning the clinical care of patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm. Br J Surg 2014; 101: 216-224 ; discussion 224
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Rogers IS, Massaro JM, Truong QA et al. Distribution, determinants, and normal reference values of thoracic and abdominal aortic diameters by computed tomography (from the Framingham Heart Study). Am J Cardiol 2013; 111: 1510-1516
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Long A, Rouet L, Lindholt JS et al. Measuring the maximum diameter of native abdominal aortic aneurysms: review and critical analysis. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2012; 43: 515-524
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Guirguis-Blake JM, Beil TL, Senger CA et al. Ultrasonography screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms: a systematic evidence review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med 2014; 160: 321-329
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Lederle FA, Johnson GR, Wilson SE et al. The aneurysm detection and management study screening program: validation cohort and final results. Aneurysm Detection and Management Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Investigators. Arch Intern Med 2000; 160: 1425-1430
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Stather PW, Sidloff DA, Rhema IA et al. A review of current reporting of abdominal aortic aneurysm mortality and prevalence in the literature. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2014; 47: 240-242
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 8 DeStatis Statistisches Bundesamt Im Internet: http://www.gbe-bund.de (Stand 1.12.2014)
  • 9 Dua A, Kuy S, Lee CJ et al. Epidemiology of aortic aneurysm repair in the United States from 2000 to 2010. J Vasc Surg 2014; 59: 1512-1517
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Debus ES, Nüllen H, Torsello G et al. Zur Behandlung des abdominellen Aortenaneurysmas in Deutschland. Gefässchirurgie 2014; 19: 412-421
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Ozkan U, Oğuzkurt L, Tercan F et al. Renal artery origins and variations: angiographic evaluation of 855 consecutive patients. Diagn Interv Radiol 2006; 12: 183-186
    Google Scholar
  • 12 Armon MP, Wenham PW, Whitaker SC et al. Common iliac artery aneurysms in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 1998; 15: 255-257
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Brunkwall J, Hauksson H, Bengtsson H et al. Solitary aneurysms of the iliac arterial system: an estimate of their frequency of occurrence. J Vasc Surg 1989; 10: 381-384
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Wassef M, Baxter BT, Chisholm RL et al. Pathogenesis of abdominal aortic aneurysms: a multidisciplinary research program supported by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. J Vasc Surg 2001; 34: 730-738
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Lindholt JS, Juul S, Vammen S et al. Immunoglobulin A antibodies against Chlamydia pneumoniae are associated with expansion of abdominal aortic aneurysm. Br J Surg 1999; 86: 634-638
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Brady AR, Thompson SG, Fowkes FG et al. Abdominal aortic aneurysm expansion: risk factors and time intervals for surveillance. Circulation 2004; 110: 16-21
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Darling RC, Messina CR, Brewster DC et al. Autopsy study of unoperated abdominal aortic aneurysms. The case for early resection. Circulation 1977; 56: II161-II164
    Google Scholar
  • 18 Reed WW, Hallett Jr JW, Damiano MA et al. Learning from the last ultrasound. A population-based study of patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm. Arch Intern Med 1997; 157: 2064-2068
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Bhak RH, Wininger M, Johnson GR et al. Factors associated with small abdominal aortic aneurysm expansion rate. JAMA Surg 2014; DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2014.2025. [Epub ahead of print]
    Google Scholar
  • 20 Schouten O, van Laanen JH, Boersma E et al. Statins are associated with a reduced infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm growth. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2006; 32: 21-26
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Sukhija R, Aronow WS, Sandhu R et al. Mortality and size of abdominal aortic aneurysm at long-term follow-up of patients not treated surgically and treated with and without statins. Am J Cardiol 2006; 97: 279-280
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Wemmelund H, Høgh A, Hundborg HH et al. Statin use and rupture of abdominal aortic aneurysm. Br J Surg 2014; 101: 966-975
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Lo RC, Lu B, Fokkema MT et al. Relative importance of aneurysm diameter and body size for predicting abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture in men and women. J Vasc Surg 2014; 59: 1209-1216
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Moll FL, Powell JT, Fraedrich G et al. Management of abdominal aortic aneurysms clinical practice guidelines of the European society for vascular surgery. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2011; 41 (Suppl. 01) 1-S58
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Thompson SG, Ashton HA, Gao L et al. Final follow-up of the Multicentre Aneurysm Screening Study (MASS) randomized trial of abdominal aortic aneurysm screening. Br J Surg 2012; 99: 1649-1656
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Lindholt JS, Juul S, Henneberg EW. High-risk and low-risk screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm both reduce aneurysm-related mortality. A stratified analysis from a single-centre randomised screening trial. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2007; 34: 53-58
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Ashton HA, Gao L, Kim LG et al. Fifteen-year follow-up of a randomized clinical trial of ultrasonographic screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms. Br J Surg 2007; 94: 696-701
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Fleming C, Whitlock EP, Beil TL et al. Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm: a best-evidence systematic review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med 2005; 142: 203-211
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Lederle FA, Simel DL. The rational clinical examination. Does this patient have abdominal aortic aneurysm?. JAMA 1999; 281: 77-82
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 30 LeFevre ML. U.S.P.S.T. Force. Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med 2014; 161: 281-290
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Abbas A, Hansrani V, Sedgwick N et al. 3D contrast enhanced ultrasound for detecting endoleak following endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2014; 47: 487-492
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Buffa V, Solazzo A, D’Auria V et al. Dual-source dual-energy CT: dose reduction after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Radiol Med 2014; 119: 934-941
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Moos SI, van Vemde DN, Stoker J et al. Contrast induced nephropathy in patients undergoing intravenous (IV) contrast enhanced computed tomography (CECT) and the relationship with risk factors: a meta-analysis. Eur J Radiol 2013; 82: e387-e399
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Cantisani V, Ricci P, Grazhdani H et al. Prospective comparative analysis of colour-Doppler ultrasound, contrast-enhanced ultrasound, computed tomography and magnetic resonance in detecting endoleak after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2011; 41: 186-192
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Marckmann P, Skov L, Rossen K et al. Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis: suspected causative role of gadodiamide used for contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Soc Nephrol 2006; 17: 2359-2362
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Heidemann F, Meier U, Kölbel T et al. Wie ist die Umsetzung eines AAA-Screening-Programms in Deutschland möglich?. Gefässchirurgie 2014; 19: 564-567
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Lindholt JS, Vammen S, Fasting H et al. Psychological consequences of screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm and conservative treatment of small abdominal aortic aneurysms. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2000; 20: 79-83
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Erbel R, Aboyans V, Boileau C et al. 2014 ESC Guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of aortic diseases: Document covering acute and chronic aortic diseases of the thoracic and abdominal aorta of the adult. The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Aortic Diseases of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J 2014; 35: 2873-2926
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar