Download PDF
J Reconstr Microsurg 2015; 31(03): 179-186
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1390165
Original Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Stacked Abdominal Flap for Unilateral Breast Reconstruction

Alexandra Murray
1   Plastic Surgery Department, St Vincent's Hospital, Fitzroy, Victoria, Australia
2   Plastic Surgery Department, St Vincent's Private, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
3   Plastic Surgery Department, Western Hospital, Gordon Street, Footscray, Victoria, Australia
,
Jason Wasiak
4   Victorian Adult Burns Service and School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, The Alfred Hospital, Commercial Road, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
,
Warren Matthew Rozen
1   Plastic Surgery Department, St Vincent's Hospital, Fitzroy, Victoria, Australia
2   Plastic Surgery Department, St Vincent's Private, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
3   Plastic Surgery Department, Western Hospital, Gordon Street, Footscray, Victoria, Australia
,
Scott Ferris
1   Plastic Surgery Department, St Vincent's Hospital, Fitzroy, Victoria, Australia
2   Plastic Surgery Department, St Vincent's Private, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
3   Plastic Surgery Department, Western Hospital, Gordon Street, Footscray, Victoria, Australia
,
Damien Grinsell
1   Plastic Surgery Department, St Vincent's Hospital, Fitzroy, Victoria, Australia
2   Plastic Surgery Department, St Vincent's Private, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
3   Plastic Surgery Department, Western Hospital, Gordon Street, Footscray, Victoria, Australia
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

03 March 2014

06 August 2014

Publication Date:
26 September 2014 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Background The abdominal flap can be used in a stacked, double-pedicle configuration for unilateral breast reconstruction. Aided by preoperative mapping, this is a good option when a single-pedicle flap is deemed unsuitable. We present reliable outcomes using the stacked flap and a logical classification system for its use.

Methods From 2008 to 2013, 18 patients underwent a stacked abdominal flap for unilateral breast reconstruction. Flaps utilized deep inferior epigastric (D) and superficial inferior epigastric (S) pedicle combinations. Preoperative computed tomography angiogram was performed on all patients. Medical records were reviewed for complications and clinical data, and a thorough clinical evaluation was performed on all patients at follow-up. Flaps were all double-pedicled, with the secondary pedicle anastomosed onto the primary pedicle (type 1 to 3) or onto a second recipient vessel (type 4). Flaps were then classified into groups, based on pedicle dominance and intraflap anastomosis.

Results Twelve reconstructions were immediate and six delayed. Mean operative time was 7 hours, the most frequently used configuration being a type 1 DD, that is, secondary pedicle (D) anastomosed end-to-end onto the superior continuation of the primary pedicle (D). Average hospital stay was 6 days. There were no flap losses and minimal complications, and mean follow-up was 20 months.

Conclusion Use of this flap poses a greater challenge to the microsurgical breast reconstruction. We demonstrate its reliable use in women deemed unsuitable for a single-pedicle flap. Our structured system clarifies vascular options, and preoperative perforator mapping tools are essential to the success of this technique.

Keywords

breast - stacked - DIEP - reconstruction - classification
 

  • References

  • 1 Blondeel N, Vanderstraeten GG, Monstrey SJ , et al. The donor site morbidity of free DIEP flaps and free TRAM flaps for breast reconstruction. Br J Plast Surg 1997; 50 (5) 322-330
    Google Scholar
  • 2 Futter CM, Webster MH, Hagen S, Mitchell SL. A retrospective comparison of abdominal muscle strength following breast reconstruction with a free TRAM or DIEP flap. Br J Plast Surg 2000; 53 (7) 578-583
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Nahabedian MY, Dooley W, Singh N, Manson PN. Contour abnormalities of the abdomen after breast reconstruction with abdominal flaps: the role of muscle preservation. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002; 109 (1) 91-101
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Blondeel PN. One hundred free DIEP flap breast reconstructions: a personal experience. Br J Plast Surg 1999; 52 (2) 104-111
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Katz RD, Manahan MA, Rad AN, Flores JI, Singh NK, Rosson GD. Classification schema for anatomic variations of the inferior epigastric vasculature evaluated by abdominal CT angiograms for breast reconstruction. Microsurgery 2010; 30 (8) 593-602
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Rozen WM, Ashton MW, Stella DL, Phillips TJ, Grinsell D, Taylor GI. The accuracy of computed tomographic angiography for mapping the perforators of the deep inferior epigastric artery: a blinded, prospective cohort study. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008; 122 (4) 1003-1009
    Google Scholar
  • 7 Rozen WM, Garcia-Tutor E, Alonso-Burgos A, Corlett RJ, Taylor GI, Ashton MW. The effect of anterior abdominal wall scars on the vascular anatomy of the abdominal wall: a cadaveric and clinical study with clinical implications. Clin Anat 2009; 22 (7) 815-822
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Rozen WM, Ashton MW, Grinsell D. The branching pattern of the deep inferior epigastric artery revisited in-vivo: a new classification based on CT angiography. Clin Anat 2010; 23 (1) 87-92
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Arnez ZM, Scamp T. The bipedicled free TRAM flap. Br J Plast Surg 1992; 45 (3) 214-218
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Simon AM, Bouwense CL, McMillan S, Lamb S, Hammond DC. Comparison of unipedicled and bipedicled TRAM flap breast reconstructions: assessment of physical function and patient satisfaction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004; 113 (1) 136-140
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Jensen JA. Is double pedicle TRAM flap reconstruction of a single breast within the standard of care?. Plast Reconstr Surg 1997; 100 (6) 1592-1593
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Pennington DG, Nettle WJ, Lam P. Microvascular augmentation of the blood supply of the contralateral side of the free transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap. Ann Plast Surg 1993; 31 (2) 123-126 , discussion 126–127
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Semple JL. Retrograde microvascular augmentation (turbocharging) of a single-pedicle TRAM flap through a deep inferior epigastric arterial and venous loop. Plast Reconstr Surg 1994; 93 (1) 109-117
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Blondeel PN, Boeckx WD. Refinements in free flap breast reconstruction: the free bilateral deep inferior epigastric perforator flap anastomosed to the internal mammary artery. Br J Plast Surg 1994; 47 (7) 495-501
    Google Scholar
  • 15 Lam TC, Sellars GD. Free perforator crossover TRAM flap for breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 2003; 50 (2) 126-131
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Tseng CY, Lang PO, Cipriani NA, Song DH. Pedicle preservation technique for arterial and venous turbocharging of free DIEP and muscle-sparing TRAM flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 120 (4) 851-854
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Agarwal JP, Gottlieb LJ. Double pedicle deep inferior epigastric perforator/muscle-sparing TRAM flaps for unilateral breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 2007; 58 (4) 359-363
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Schoeller T, Wechselberger G, Roger J, Hussl H, Huemer GM. Management of infraumbilical vertical scars in DIEP-flaps by crossover anastomosis. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2007; 60 (5) 524-528
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Ali RS, Garrido A, Ramakrishnan V. Stacked free hemi-DIEP flaps: a method of autologous breast reconstruction in a patient with midline abdominal scarring. Br J Plast Surg 2002; 55 (4) 351-353
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Kronowitz SJ, Robb GL, Youssef A , et al. Optimizing autologous breast reconstruction in thin patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 2003; 112 (7) 1768-1778
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Hamdi M, Khuthaila DK, Van Landuyt K, Roche N, Monstrey S. Double-pedicle abdominal perforator free flaps for unilateral breast reconstruction: new horizons in microsurgical tissue transfer to the breast. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2007; 60 (8) 904-912 , discussion 913–914
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Rabey NG, Erel E, Malata CM. Double-pedicled abdominal free flap using an entirely new microvascular combination of DIEP and SIEA vascular pedicles for unilateral breast reconstruction: a novel addition to the Hamdi classification. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012; 130 (5) 767e-769e
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Chan RK, Przylecki W, Guo L, Caterson SA. Case report. The use of both antegrade and retrograde internal mammary vessels in a folded, stacked deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap. Eplasty 2010; 10: e32
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 DellaCroce FJ, Sullivan SK, Trahan C. Stacked deep inferior epigastric perforator flap breast reconstruction: a review of 110 flaps in 55 cases over 3 years. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011; 127 (3) 1093-1099
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Beahm EK, Walton RL. The efficacy of bilateral lower abdominal free flaps for unilateral breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 120 (1) 41-54
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Holm C, Mayr M, Höfter E, Ninkovic M. Perfusion zones of the DIEP flap revisited: a clinical study. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006; 117 (1) 37-43
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar