J Knee Surg 2015; 28(01): 035-044
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1390028
Special Focus Section
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

How Should We Evaluate Outcomes for Use of Biologics in the Knee?

Christopher M. LaPrade
1   Steadman Philippon Research Institute, Vail, Colorado
,
Evan W. James
1   Steadman Philippon Research Institute, Vail, Colorado
,
Robert F. LaPrade
1   Steadman Philippon Research Institute, Vail, Colorado
2   The Steadman Clinic, Vail, Colorado
,
Lars Engebretsen
3   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Oslo University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo and Oslo Sports Trauma Research Center, Oslo, Norway
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

31 March 2014

24 July 2014

Publication Date:
26 September 2014 (online)

Preview

Abstract

In recent years, the use of biologics for the primary treatment and augmentation of treatment in patients with knee pathology has increased substantially. Techniques and applications for biologic preparations such as platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have been developed and refined to increase the healing response in bone, ligaments, cartilage, meniscal tissue, and other areas of the knee. Beginning with basic science and animal models, and finally proceeding to clinical human trials, the effect of biologics on clinical outcomes has been widely studied; however, many results have been inconclusive on their true effectiveness. The purpose of this article is to review current strategies for evaluating outcomes after biologic treatment and to propose new recommendations for assessing outcomes following the use of biologics in the knee. In addition, the importance of study design, current challenges, and future directions will be reviewed to describe the current standards for future studies to follow.