Spatiotemporal Variables of Able-bodied and Amputee Sprinters in Men’s 100-m Sprint

Abstract

The difference in world records set by able-bodied sprinters and amputee sprinters in the men’s 100-m sprint is still approximately 1 s (as of 28 March 2014). Theoretically, forward velocity in a 100-m sprint is the product of step frequency and step length. The goal of this study was to examine the hypothesis that differences in the sprint performance of able-bodied and amputee sprinters would be due to a shorter step length rather than lower step frequency. Men’s elite-level 100-m races with a total of 36 able-bodied, 25 unilateral and 17 bilateral amputee sprinters were analyzed from the publicly available internet broadcasts of 11 races. For each run of each sprinter, the average forward velocity, step frequency and step length over the whole 100-m distance were analyzed. The average forward velocity of able-bodied sprinters was faster than that of the other 2 groups, but there was no significant difference in average step frequency among the 3 groups. However, the average step length of able-bodied sprinters was significantly longer than that of the other 2 groups. These results suggest that the differences in sprint performance between 2 groups would be due to a shorter step length rather than lower step frequency.

Key words

prosthetic sprinting - step frequency - step length

• References

• 1 Brüggemann GP, Arampatzis A, Emrich F, Potthast W. Biomechanics of double transtibial amputee sprinting using dedicated sprinting prostheses. Sports Tech 2009; 1: 220-227
• 2 Grabowski AM, McGowan CP, McDermott WJ, Beale MT, Kram R, Herr HM. Running-specific prostheses limit ground-force during sprinting. Biol Lett 2010; 6: 201-204
• 3 Harriss DJ, Atkinson G. Ethical Standards in Sport and Exercise Science Research: 2014 Update. Int J Sports Med 2013; 34: 1025-1028
• 4 Hay JG. The Biomechanics of Sports Techniques. 4^th ed London: Prentice Hall International; 1994
• 5 Hobara H, Baum BS, Kwon HJ, Miller RH, Ogata T, Kim YH, Shim JK. Amputee Locomotion: Spring-like leg behavior and stiffness regulation using running-specific prostheses. J Biomech 2013; 46: 2483-2489
• 6 Hunter JP, Marshall RN, McNair PJ. Interaction of step length and step rate during sprint running. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2004; 36: 261-271
• 7 Lechler K, Lilja M. Lower extremity leg amputation: an advantage in running?. Sports Tech 2008; 1: 229-234
• 8 McGowan CP, Grabowski AM, McDermott WJ, Herr HM, Kram R. Leg stiffness of sprinters using running-specific prostheses. J Roy Soc Inter 2012; 9: 1975-1982
• 9 Nolan L. Carbon fibre prostheses and running in amputees: a review. Foot Ankle Surg 2008; 14: 125-129
• 10 Salo AI, Bezodis IN, Batterham AM, Kerwin DG. Elite sprinting: are athletes individually step-frequency or step-length reliant?. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2011; 43: 1055-1062
• 11 Scholz MS, Blanchfield JP, Bloom LD, Coburn BH, Elkington M, Fuller JD, Gilbert ME, Muflahi SA, Pernice MF, Rae SI, Trevarthen JA, White SC, Weaver PM, Bond IP. The use of composite materials in modern orthopaedic medicine and prosthetic devices: A review. Comp Sci Tech 2011; 71: 1791-1803
• 12 Stewart AM, Hopkins WG. Consistency of swimming performance within and between competitions. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2000; 32: 997-1001
• 13 Tweedy S IPC Athletics Classification Project for Physical Impairments: Final Report 2010- Stage 1
• 14 Webster JB, Levy CE, Bryant PR, Prusakowski PE. Sports and recreation for persons with limb deficiency. Arch Phys Med Rehab 2001; 82: S38-S44
• 15 Weyand PG, Bundle MW, McGowan CP, Grabowski A, Brown MB, Kram R, Herr H. The fastest runner on artificial legs: different limbs, similar function?. J Appl Physiol 2009; 107: 903-911
• 16 Weyand PG, Sternlight DB, Bellizzi MJ, Wright S. Faster top running speeds are achieved with greater ground forces not more rapid leg movements. J Appl Physiol 2000; 89: 1991-1995