Modelllernen

Zusammenfassung

Lernen am Modell zeigt sich in verschiedensten Lernsituationen als sehr hilfreiche Strategie. Es kann zum Erwerb von motorischen Fertigkeiten dienen (z. B. als Kind) und auch zur Wiederherstellung von motorischen Fertigkeiten, die vor einem Unfall oder einer Krankheit beherrscht wurden. Lernen am Modell stellt eine körperlich nicht belastende Methode dar, um möglichst effektiv motorisch zu lernen. Der Einfluss von Modelllernen bei gruppentherapeutischen Situationen ist daher nicht zu unterschätzen.

• Literatur

• 1 Badets A, Blandin Y. Feedback schedules for motor-skill learning: The similarities and differences between physical and observational practice. Journal of Motor Behavior 2010; 42: 257-268
• 2 Bandura A. Lernen am Modell. Ansätze zu einer sozial-kognitiven Lerntheorie. Stuttgart: Klett; 1976
• 3 Brass M, Heyes C. Imitation: Is cognitive neuroscience solving the correspondence problem?. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2005; 9: 489-495
• 4 Celnik P, Webster B, Glasser DM et al. Effects of action observation on physical training after stroke. Stroke 2008; 39: 1814-1820
• 5 Deakin JM, Proteau L. The role of scheduling in learning through observation. Journal of Motor Behavior 2000; 31: 268-276
• 6 Ertelt D, Small S, Solodkin A et al. Action observation has a positive impact on rehabilitation of motor deficits after stroke. NeuroImage 2007; 36: 164-173
• 7 Garrison KA, Winstein CJ, Aziz-Zadeh L. The mirror neuron system: A neural substrate for methods in stroke rehabilitation. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair 2010; 24: 404-412
• 8 Hebert EP, Landin D. Effects of a learning model and augmented feedback on tennis skill acquisition. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 1994; 65: 250-257
• 9 Huang VS, Krakauer JW. Robotic neurorehabilitation: A computational motor learning perspective. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation 2009; 6: 5
• 10 Lee TD, White MA. Influence of an unskilled model’s practice schedule on observational motor learning. Human Movement Science 1990; 9: 349-367
• 11 McCullagh P, Meyer KN. Learning versus correct models: Influence of model type on the learning of a free-weight squat lift. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 1997; 68: 56-61
• 12 McCullagh P, Weiss M. Modelling: Considerations for motor skill performance and psychological responses. In: Singer RN, Hausenblas HA, Janelle CM, Eds. Handbook of sport psychology. New York: Wiley; 1997
• 13 Ong NT, Hodges NJ. Mixing it up a little. In: Hodges N, Williams AM. Skill acquisition in sport: Research, theory and practice. London: Routledge; 2012
• 14 Prinz W. Perception and action planning. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 1997; 9: 129-154
• 15 Rizzolatti G, Craighero L. The mirror-neuron system. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 2004; 27: 169-192
• 16 Rohbanfard H, Proteau L. Learning through observation: A combination of expert and novice models favors learning. Exp. Brain Research 2011; 215: 183-197
• 17 Schmidt RA, Lee TD. Motor control and learning: A behavioral emphasis. 5th ed. Champaign: Human Kinetics; 2011
• 18 Shea CH, Wright DL, Wulf G et al. Physical and observational practice afford unique learning opportunities. Journal of Motor Behavior 2000; 32: 27-36
• 19 Weiss MR, McCullagh P, Smith AL et al. Observational learning and the fearful child: Influence of peer models on swimming skill performance and psychological responses. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 1998; 69: 380-394
• 20 Wulf G, Mornell A. Insights about practice from the perspective of motor learning: A review. Music Performance Research 2008; 2: 1-15