Endoscopy 2014; 46(S 01): E555-E556
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1377950
Cases and Techniques Library (CTL)
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Rectal carcinoid tumor: a delayed localized recurrence 23 years after endoscopic resection

Stephanie Judd
1   Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, John D. Dingell VA Medical Center and Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, United States
2   Detroit Medical Center, Detroit, United States
,
Sharad Nangia
1   Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, John D. Dingell VA Medical Center and Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, United States
2   Detroit Medical Center, Detroit, United States
,
Edi Levi
3   Department of Pathology, John D. Dingell VA Medical Center and Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, United States
,
Fadi Antaki
1   Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, John D. Dingell VA Medical Center and Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, United States
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Corresponding author

Stephanie Judd, MD
John D. Dingell VA Medical Center – Gastroenterology
4646 John R. Road
11M-GAS
Detroit
Michigan 48201
United States   
Fax: +1-313-576-1237   

Publication History

Publication Date:
19 November 2014 (online)

 

Rectal carcinoid tumors are rare representing approximately 2 % of rectal malignancies [1]. While treatment approaches vary and can include endoscopic or surgical resection, small (< 1 cm) carcinoid tumors have extremely low rates of local recurrence and metastasis [1] [2] [3]. Our case is the first describing a delayed recurrence of rectal carcinoid tumor more than 20 years after initial endoscopic resection.

A 67-year-old man presented for surveillance colonoscopy with a history of rectal carcinoid tumor. He had undergone endoscopic resection of a 4 mm rectal carcinoid tumor 5 cm from the anal verge 23 years earlier ([Fig. 1]). Three surveillance colonoscopies since resection were negative for residual carcinoid tissue. Recent colonoscopy showed a scar in the rectum with a 5-mm raised area ([Fig. 2]), which was resected via snare cautery polypectomy. Pathology was consistent with rectal carcinoid tumor ([Fig. 3] and [Fig. 4]). Immunohistochemical stain for synaptophysin was positive; chromogranin was negative ([Fig. 5]). Less than 1 % of cells stained positive for Ki-67, indicative of a low proliferative rate and metastatic potential ([Fig. 6]) [4]. Flexible sigmoidoscopy 3 months later showed no recurrence.

Zoom
Fig. 1 Low power histologic image showing polygonal cells forming chords and small nests with intervening stroma consistent with carcinoid with trabecular growth pattern (H&E; original magnification: × 100).
Zoom
Fig. 2 Endoscopic image of rectum showing prior polypectomy scar with raised area.
Zoom
Fig. 3 Low power histologic image showing small chords of polygonal cells, consistent with recurrence of carcinoid tumor (H&E; original magnification: × 100).
Zoom
Fig. 4 High power histologic image consistent with recurrence of carcinoid tumor (H&E; original magnification: × 200).
Zoom
Fig. 5 Immunohistochemical staining for synaptophysin was positive, demonstrated by diffuse red staining in cytoplasm (original magnification: × 100).
Zoom
Fig. 6 Staining with Ki-67 showing that less than 1 % of tumor cells stained positive (red/brown dots represent nuclear staining for proliferation marker Ki-67) (H&E; original magnification: × 1).

Rectal carcinoids are well-differentiated hindgut neuroendocrine tumors and are the most common location for colorectal carcinoids [1] [2] [3] [5]. Hindgut tumors typically display a trabecular growth pattern whereas midgut tumors usually show a nested pattern [5]. As in our case, the majority are found incidentally during endoscopic screening [1] [2] [3]. Lesions less than 1 cm have very low rates of metastasis and local recurrence, and endoscopic resection via polypectomy or endoscopic mucosal resection is appropriate [1] [2] [3]. Our case demonstrates that delayed recurrence of rectal carcinoid tumors can occur decades later in lesions with low mitotic rates and also highlights the importance of vigilantly assessing and sampling the scar site for suspicious tissue via biopsy or polypectomy, even years after resection.

Endoscopy_UCTN_Code_CCL_1AD_2AB


Competing interests: None

Acknowledgments

This material is the result of work supported with resources and the use of facilities at the John D. Dingell VAMC, Detroit, Michigan. The content does not represent the views of the Department of Veterans Affairs or the United States Government.


Corresponding author

Stephanie Judd, MD
John D. Dingell VA Medical Center – Gastroenterology
4646 John R. Road
11M-GAS
Detroit
Michigan 48201
United States   
Fax: +1-313-576-1237   


Zoom
Fig. 1 Low power histologic image showing polygonal cells forming chords and small nests with intervening stroma consistent with carcinoid with trabecular growth pattern (H&E; original magnification: × 100).
Zoom
Fig. 2 Endoscopic image of rectum showing prior polypectomy scar with raised area.
Zoom
Fig. 3 Low power histologic image showing small chords of polygonal cells, consistent with recurrence of carcinoid tumor (H&E; original magnification: × 100).
Zoom
Fig. 4 High power histologic image consistent with recurrence of carcinoid tumor (H&E; original magnification: × 200).
Zoom
Fig. 5 Immunohistochemical staining for synaptophysin was positive, demonstrated by diffuse red staining in cytoplasm (original magnification: × 100).
Zoom
Fig. 6 Staining with Ki-67 showing that less than 1 % of tumor cells stained positive (red/brown dots represent nuclear staining for proliferation marker Ki-67) (H&E; original magnification: × 1).