Endoscopy 2014; 46(S 01): E401-E402
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1377545
Cases and Techniques Library (CTL)
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Transanal submucosal endoscopic resection: a new endosurgical approach to the resection of giant rectal lesions

Zacharias P. Tsiamoulos
1   Wolfson Unit for Endoscopy, St Mark’s Hospital and Academic Institute, London, UK
,
Janindra Warusavitarne
2   Department of Colorectal Surgery, St Mark’s Hospital and Academic Institute, London, UK
,
Brian P. Saunders
1   Wolfson Unit for Endoscopy, St Mark’s Hospital and Academic Institute, London, UK
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Corresponding author

Zacharias P. Tsiamoulos, MBBS
Wolfson Unit for Endoscopy
St Mark’s Hospital and Academic Institute
London HA1 3UJ
United Kingdom   
Fax: +44-208-8692936   

Publication History

Publication Date:
25 September 2014 (online)

 

Transanal surgical and advanced endoscopic resection procedures have the potential to provide complete and successful eradication of rectal lesions [1] [2] [3]. However, both approaches have limitations in terms of practicability and safety [3] [4] [5].

Transanal submucosal endoscopic resection (TASER) is a new endosurgical approach, which combines the advantages of both endoscopic therapy and transanal surgery. It utilizes a three-port channel platform (GelPoint Path; Applied Medical, Rancho Santa Margarita, California, USA), which allows simultaneous transanal passage of an endoscope and two laparoscopic instruments ([Fig. 1]).

Zoom Image
Fig. 1 Transanal passage of an endoscope and two laparoscopic retractors using the GelPoint Path platform (Applied Medical, Rancho Santa Margarita, California, USA).

We present a video clip demonstrating TASER, where an endoscopic knife is used as the primary cutting tool to resect a (9.4 × 7.6 cm) circumferential (abutting the dentate line to the upper rectum), benign, nongranular, lateral spreading tumor ([Fig. 2]).

Zoom Image
Fig. 2 Pinned out specimen following transanal submucosal endoscopic resection approach.

A 2-mm lateral resection margin around the lesion was maintained during circumferential mucosal incision. The GelPoint Path system was then mounted across the anal canal and a surgeon passed two laparoscopic forceps retractors (Johann Forceps 33 cm; Karl Storz, Tuttlingen, Germany) into the rectum, working alongside the endoscopist who passed a gastroscope through the third port; both operators utilized the endoscopic view. Once a tissue flap had been created, the submucosal dissection was rapid, using long sweeping movements of the endoscopic knife (FlushKnife BT, 1.5 mm; Fujifilm, Tokyo, Japan) parallel to the underlying muscle. Repeated injections expanded the submucosal plane and sustained a clear separation of the submucosal and muscle layers. The retractors could be repositioned multiple times and in any direction, providing the endoscopist with a continuous view of the submucosal plane ([Video 1]). The en bloc resection was completed in 182 minutes. Large vessels were coagulated and clipped to prevent delayed bleeding.


Quality:
Transanal submucosal endoscopic resection: a new endosurgical platform for the en bloc resection of giant, benign, rectal polyps.

After a 6-month interval, a check-up endoscopy showed a healed scar with no signs of recurrence or rectal stricture ([Fig. 3]).

Zoom Image
Fig. 3 Post-transanal submucosal endoscopic resection scar, with no residual polyp on white light endoscopy with indigo carmine.

The TASER approach appears to be technically easier and fundamentally safer than conventional transanal surgery and advanced endoscopic therapy for the resection of giant (> 5 cm) rectal polyps.

Endoscopy_UCTN_Code_TTT_1AQ_2AD


#

Competing interests: None

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge Mr Stephen Preston, BA, Multimedia Consultant, for editing the images and video clip. 

This video clip was presented at the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Learning Center during Digestive Disease Week 2014 (3 – 6 May, Chicago, Illinois, USA).

  • References

  • 1 Flexer SM, Durham-Hall AC, Steward MA et al. TEMS: results of a specialist centre. Surg Endosc 2014; 28: 1874-1878
  • 2 Albert MR, Atallah SB, deBeche-Adams TC et al. Transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) for local excision of benign neoplasms and early-stage rectal cancer: efficacy and outcomes in the first 50 patients. Dis Colon Rectum 2013; 56: 301-307
  • 3 Probst A, Golger D, Anthuber M et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection in large sessile lesions of the rectosigmoid: learning curve in a European center. Endoscopy 2012; 44: 660-667
  • 4 Barendse RM, van den Broek FJ, Dekker E et al. Systematic review of endoscopic mucosal resection versus transanal endoscopic microsurgery for large rectal adenomas. Endoscopy 2011; 43: 941-949
  • 5 Arezzo A, Passera R, Saito Y et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of endoscopic submucosal dissection versus transanal endoscopic microsurgery for large noninvasive rectal lesions. Surg Endosc 2014; 28: 427-438

Corresponding author

Zacharias P. Tsiamoulos, MBBS
Wolfson Unit for Endoscopy
St Mark’s Hospital and Academic Institute
London HA1 3UJ
United Kingdom   
Fax: +44-208-8692936   

  • References

  • 1 Flexer SM, Durham-Hall AC, Steward MA et al. TEMS: results of a specialist centre. Surg Endosc 2014; 28: 1874-1878
  • 2 Albert MR, Atallah SB, deBeche-Adams TC et al. Transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) for local excision of benign neoplasms and early-stage rectal cancer: efficacy and outcomes in the first 50 patients. Dis Colon Rectum 2013; 56: 301-307
  • 3 Probst A, Golger D, Anthuber M et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection in large sessile lesions of the rectosigmoid: learning curve in a European center. Endoscopy 2012; 44: 660-667
  • 4 Barendse RM, van den Broek FJ, Dekker E et al. Systematic review of endoscopic mucosal resection versus transanal endoscopic microsurgery for large rectal adenomas. Endoscopy 2011; 43: 941-949
  • 5 Arezzo A, Passera R, Saito Y et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of endoscopic submucosal dissection versus transanal endoscopic microsurgery for large noninvasive rectal lesions. Surg Endosc 2014; 28: 427-438

Zoom Image
Fig. 1 Transanal passage of an endoscope and two laparoscopic retractors using the GelPoint Path platform (Applied Medical, Rancho Santa Margarita, California, USA).
Zoom Image
Fig. 2 Pinned out specimen following transanal submucosal endoscopic resection approach.
Zoom Image
Fig. 3 Post-transanal submucosal endoscopic resection scar, with no residual polyp on white light endoscopy with indigo carmine.