Am J Perinatol 2014; 31(10): 923-925
DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1361935
Commentary
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Long-Term Trends in Applicants for Maternal-Fetal Medicine Fellowship Positions

Joey E. Tyner
1   Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, New Mexico
,
William F. Rayburn
1   Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, New Mexico
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

01 August 2013

18 October 2013

Publication Date:
17 December 2013 (online)

Abstract

Objective To examine long-term trends in applicants for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (MFM) fellowship positions specifically following the prolongation of fellowship training in 1997 from 2 to 3 years.

Study Design  We conducted a review of the data from the National Residency Matching Program (NRMP) from 1992 to 2013 in order to compare the numbers of total applicants with those who matched.

Results There was a significant decline in the number of applicants per year between 1997 and 2001. In the subsequent 12 years, the number of applicants exceeded the number of positions with nearly all programs being filled per year. After reaching a nadir of 60 fellowship positions in 2000, the numbers of programs and positions increased gradually to levels now equal to before prolongation of training.

Conclusions These findings should be helpful as pursuit of fellowship training is being considered earlier in residency and as the balance between generalists and subspecialists in obstetrics and gynecology is being more closely evaluated.

 
  • References

  • 1 Pearse WH, Gant NF, Hagner AP. Workforce projections for subspecialists in obstetrics and gynecology. Obstet Gynecol 2000; 95 (2) 312-314
  • 2 Gerbie AB. The American Board of Obstetrics and Gynecology: a personalized history 1980–2000. Dallas, TX: American Board of Obstetrics and Gynecology; 2001: 85
  • 3 Sciscione A. The effect of board-imposed changes on maternal-fetal medicine fellowships. Obstet Gynecol 2004; 103 (1) 143-147
  • 4 Lu G, Owen J, Wenstrom K. Obstetrics and gynecology residents' attitudes toward maternal-fetal medicine fellowship training. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2004; 16 (5) 259-263
  • 5 National Residency Matching Program Available at www.nrmp.org . Accessed on April 24, 2013.
  • 6 Alexander H, Herold C, Krakower J. Report on medical school faculty salaries, 2000–2001. Association of American Medical Colleges, Washington DC, 2002.
  • 7 Zhang F, Wisniewski S. Report on medical school faculty salaries, 2011–2012. Association of American Medical Colleges, Washington DC, 2013.
  • 8 Medical Group Management Association Median Annual Compensation of Physicians by Obstetric-Gynecologic Specialty. Physician compensation and production survey: 2002 report based on 2001 data. Englewood, CO: 2002
  • 9 Medical Group Management Association. Median Annual Compensation of Physicians by Obstetric-Gynecologic Specialty. Physician compensation and production survey: 2013 report based on 2012 data. Englewood, CO: 2013
  • 10 Future Directions in Resident Education. Summary of Conclusions. Washington, D.C.: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists; 2010
  • 11 Coustan DR, Schwartz RM, Gagnon DE, VanDorsten JP ; Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine. The distribution, practice, and attitudes of maternal-fetal medicine specialists. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001; 185 (5) 1218-1225
  • 12 Rayburn WF, Gant NF, Gilstrap LC, Elwell EC, Williams SB. Pursuit of accredited subspecialties by graduating residents in obstetrics and gynecology, 2000-2012. Obstet Gynecol 2012; 120 (3) 619-625