Download PDF
Semin Plast Surg 2013; 27(04): 190-197
DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1360586
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Spare-Part Surgery

Yeong Pin Peng
1   Department of Hand and Reconstructive Microsurgery, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
,
Amitabha Lahiri
1   Department of Hand and Reconstructive Microsurgery, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
27 November 2013 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

The authors discuss the use of scavenged tissue for reconstruction of an injured limb, also referred to as “spare-part surgery.” It forms an important part of overall reconstructive strategy. Though some principles can be laid down, there is no “textbook” method for the surgeon to follow. Successful application of this strategy requires understanding of the concept, accurate judgment, and the ability to plan “on-the-spot,” as well as knowledge and skill to improvise composite flaps from nonsalvageable parts. Requirements for limb reconstruction vary from simple solutions such as tissue coverage, which include skin grafts or flaps to more complex planning as in functional reconstruction of the hand, where the functional importance of individual digits as well as the overall prehensile function of the hand needs to be addressed right from the time of primary surgery.

The incorporation of the concept of spare-part surgery allows the surgeon to carry out primary reconstruction of the limb without resorting to harvest tissue from other regions of the body.

Keywords

spare parts - microsurgery - reconstruction - replantation - trauma
 

  • References

  • 1 Midgley RD, Entin MA. Management of mutilating injuries of the hand. Clin Plast Surg 1976; 3 (1) 99-109
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Büchler U. Traumatic soft-tissue defects of the extremities. Implications and treatment guidelines. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1990; 109 (6) 321-329
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Buchler U, Hastings H. Combined injuries. In: Green D, , ed. Operative Hand Surgery (4th ed.). New York, NY: Churchill Livingstone; 1993: 1631-1650
    Google Scholar
  • 4 Soucacos PN. Indications and selection for digital amputation and replantation. J Hand Surg [Br] 2001; 26 (6) 572-581
    Google Scholar
  • 5 Soucacos PN, Beris AE, Malizos KN, Vlastou C, Soucacos PK, Georgoulis AD. Transpositional microsurgery in multiple digital amputations. Microsurgery 1994; 15 (7) 469-473
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Küntscher MV, Erdmann D, Homann HH, Steinau HU, Levin SL, Germann G. The concept of fillet flaps: classification, indications, and analysis of their clinical value. Plast Reconstr Surg 2001; 108 (4) 885-896
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Katsaros J. Indications for free soft-tissue flap transfer to the upper limb and the role of alternative procedures. Hand Clin 1992; 8 (3) 479-507
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Ghali S, Harris PA, Khan U, Pearse M, Nanchahal J. Leg length preservation with pedicled fillet of foot flaps after traumatic amputations. Plast Reconstr Surg 2005; 115 (2) 498-505
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Kayikçioğlu A, Ağaoğlu G, Nasir S, Keçik A. Crossover replantation and fillet flap coverage of the stump after ectopic implantation: a case of bilateral leg amputation. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000; 106 (4) 868-873
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Cavadas PC, Raimondi P. Free fillet flap of the hand for elbow preservation in nonreplantable forearm amputation. J Reconstr Microsurg 2004; 20 (5) 363-366
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Baek RM, Eun SC, Heo CY, Baek SM. Amputation stump salvage using a free forearm flap from the amputated part. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2009; 62 (10) e398-e400
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar