PDF herunterladen
Semin Hear 2013; 34(04): 288-297
DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1356641
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Little Ears and Brains: Hearing Aids and Intervention

Jessica R. Sullivan
1   Department of Speech and Hearing Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Publikationsdatum:
15. Oktober 2013 (online)

    Lizenzen und Reprints

Abstract

Until recently, the habilitation process of children with hearing impairment has focused on providing access to auditory information through hearing assistive technology (e.g., hearing aids and FM systems). It is apparent from the literature that when selecting hearing aids for the pediatric population cognitive and auditory development must be taken into account. In order for pediatric hearing aid users to utilize the information provided by the hearing aids and be successful, an intervention plan that recognizes the role of cognitive factors such as working memory and attention is necessary. The current state of knowledge related to auditory training will be discussed as well as other factors related to improvement in speech perception. Future directions in auditory training and habilitation efforts will be discussed.

Keywords

Glimpsing - auditory training - hearing loss - hearing aids - auditory attention - working memory
 

  • References

  • 1 Newman R, Ratner NB, Jusczyk AM, Jusczyk PW, Dow KA. Infants' early ability to segment the conversational speech signal predicts later language development: a retrospective analysis. Dev Psychol 2006; 42 (4) 643-655
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Jusczyk PW, Houston DM, Newsome M. The beginnings of word segmentation in English-learning infants. Cognit Psychol 1999; 39 (3–4) 159-207
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Eimas PD, Siqueland ER, Jusczyk P, Vigorito J. Speech perception in infants. Science 1971; 171 (3968) 303-306
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Eggermont J, Ponton C. Of kittens and kids: Altered cortical maturation following profound deafness and cochlear implant use. Audiol Neurootol 2001; 6 (6) 363-380
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Werner L, Fay R, Popper A , eds. Auditory Development: Human Auditory Development Handbook. New York, NY: Springer; 2012
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Tinncoff R, Juscyzk P. Some beginnings of word comprehension in 6-month olds. Psychol Sci 1999; 10 (2) 172-175
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Yoshinaga-Itano C, Sedey AL, Coulter DK, Mehl AL. Language of early- and later-identified children with hearing loss. Pediatrics 1998; 102 (5) 1161-1171
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Moeller MP. Early intervention and language development in children who are deaf and hard of hearing. Pediatrics 2000; 106 (3) E43
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Fulcher A, Purcell AA, Baker E, Munro N. Listen up: children with early identified hearing loss achieve age-appropriate speech/language outcomes by 3 years-of-age. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2012; 76 (12) 1785-1794
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Finitzo-Hieber T, Tillman TW. Room acoustics effects on monosyllabic word discrimination ability for normal and hearing-impaired children. J Speech Hear Res 1978; 21 (3) 440-458
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Briscoe J, Bishop DV, Norbury CF. Phonological processing, language, and literacy: a comparison of children with mild-to-moderate sensorineural hearing loss and those with specific language impairment. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2001; 42 (3) 329-340
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Eisenberg LS. Current state of knowledge: speech recognition and production in children with hearing impairment. Ear Hear 2007; 28 (6) 766-772
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Moeller MP, Tomblin JB, Yoshinaga-Itano C, Connor CM, Jerger S. Current state of knowledge: language and literacy of children with hearing impairment. Ear Hear 2007; 28 (6) 740-753
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Osberger MJ, Moeller MP, Eccarius M, Robbins AM, Johnson D. Language and learning skills of hearing-impaired students. Expressive language skills. ASHA Monogr 1986; (23) 54-65
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Stelmachowicz PG, Hoover BM, Lewis DE, Kortekaas RW, Pittman AL. The relation between stimulus context, speech audibility, and perception for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired children. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2000; 43 (4) 902-914
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 DeBell M, Chapman C. Computer and Internet Use by Students in 2003 Statistical Analysis Report. US Department of Education Institute of Education Sciences, NCES 2006-065. September 2006. Available at: http://0-nces.ed.gov.opac.acc.msmc.edu/pubs2006/2006065.pdf . Accessed on: September 6, 2013
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act of 2001. Public Law 107–110. 2012
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Dockrell JE, Shield B. Children's perceptions of their acoustic environment at school and at home. J Acoust Soc Am 2004; 115 (6) 2964-2973
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Goldstein MA. The Acoustic Method for the Training of the Deaf, and Hard-of-Hearing Child. The Laryngoscope Press; 1939
    Google Scholar
  • 20 Ponton CW, Don M, Eggermont JJ , et al. Auditory system plasticity in children after long periods of complete deafness. Neuroreport 1996; 8 (1) 61-65
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Souza PE, Tremblay KL. New perspectives on assessing amplification effects. Trends Amplif 2006; 10 (3) 119-143
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Palmer C, Grimes A. Effectiveness of signal processing strategies for the pediatric population: a systematic review of the evidence. J Am Acad Audiol 2005; 16 (7) 505-514
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Pittman A. Short-term word-learning rate in children with normal hearing and children with hearing loss in limited and extended high-frequency bandwidths. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2008; 51 (3) 785-797
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Stelmachowicz P, Hoover B, Lewis D, Kortekaas R, Pittman L. The relation between stimulus context, speech audibility, and perception for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired children. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2000; 43 (4) 902-914
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Tremblay KL , et al. The neural representation of consonant-vowel transitions in adults who wear hearing aids. Trends Amplif 2006; 10 (3) 155-162
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Neuman A, Hochberg I. Children's perception of speech in reverberation. J Acoust Soc Am 1983; 73 (6) 2145-2149
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Nozza R, Rossman R, Bond L. Infant-adult differences in unmasked thresholds for the discrimination of consonant-vowel syllable pairs. Audiology 1991; 30 (2) 102-112
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Stelmachowicz P, Lewis D, Choi S, Hoover B. Effect of stimulus bandwidth on auditory skills in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired children. Ear Hear 2007; 28 (4) 483-494
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Stelmachowicz P, Pittman A, Hoover B, Lewis D, Moeller M. The importance of high-frequency audibility in the speech and language development of children with hearing loss. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2004; 130 (5) 556-562
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Stelmachowicz P, Lewis D, Hoover B, Nishi K, McCreery R, Woods W. Effects of digital noise reduction on speech perception for children with hearing loss. Ear Hear 2010; 31 (3) 345-355
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Ricketts T, Galster J, Tharpe A. Directional benefit in simulated classroom environments. Am J Audiol 2007; 16 (2) 130-144
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Pittman A, Lewis D, Hoover B, Stelmachowicz P. Recognition performance for four combination of FM system and hearing aid microphone signals in adverse listening conditions. Ear Hear 1999; 20 (4) 279-289
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Glista D, Scollie S, Bagatto M , et al. Evaluation of nonlinear frequency compression: clinical outcomes. Int J Audiol 2009; 48 (9) 632-644
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Tremblay K. Training-related changes in the brain: evidence from human auditory-evoked potentials. Semin Hear 2007; 28 (2) 120-137
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Tremblay K. Auditory brainstem testing: new adventures with the old auditory brain stem response. Ear Hear 2010; 31 (3) 301
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Anderson S, White-Schwoch T, Parbery-Clark A, Kraus N. Reversal of age-related neural timing delays with training. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2013; 110 (11) 4357-4362
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Dettman SJ, D'Costa WA, Dowell RC , et al. Cochlear implants for children with significant residual hearing. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2004; 130 (5) 612-618
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Houston DM, Pisoni DB, Kirk KI, Ying EA, Miyamoto RT. Speech perception skills of deaf infants following cochlear implantation: a first report. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2003; 67 (5) 479-495
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 McConkey Robbins A, Koch DB, Osberger MJ, Zimmerman-Phillips S, Kishon-Rabin L. Effect of age at cochlear implantation on auditory skill development in infants and toddlers. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2004; 130 (5) 570-574
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Skinner MW. Optimizing cochlear implant speech performance. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 2003; 191: 4-13
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 van Hoesel RJ, Tyler RS. Speech perception, localization, and lateralization with bilateral cochlear implants. J Acoust Soc Am 2003; 113 (3) 1617-1630
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Kraus N, Koch DB, McGee TJ, Nicol TG, Cunningham J. Speech-sound discrimination in school age children: psychophysical and neurophysiologic measures. J Speech Lang Hear Res 1999; 42 (5) 1042-1060
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Cooke M. Glimpsing Speech. J Phonetics 2003; 31: 579-584
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Miller GA, Licklider J. The intelligibility of interrupted speech. Journal the Acoustic Soc Am 1950; 22: 167-173
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Sweetow RW, Palmer CV. Efficacy of individual auditory training in adults: a systematic review of the evidence. J Am Acad Audiol 2005; 16 (7) 494-504
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Tremblay K, Kraus N. Auditory training induces asymmetrical changes in cortical neural activity. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2002; 45 (3) 564-572
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Tremblay K , et al. Central auditory system plasticity: generalization to novel stimuli following listening training. J Acoust Soc Am 1997; 102 (6) 3762-3773
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Billings CJ, Bennett KO, Molis MR, Leek MR. Cortical encoding of signals in noise: effects of stimulus type and recording paradigm. Ear Hear 2011; 32 (1) 53-60
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Sweetow RW, Sabes JH. The need for and development of an adaptive Listening and Communication Enhancement (LACE) Program. J Am Acad Audiol 2006; 17 (8) 538-558
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Burk MH, Humes LE. Effects of training on speech recognition performance in noise using lexically hard words. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2007; 50 (1) 25-40
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Burk MH, Humes LE, Amos NE, Strauser LE. Effect of training on word-recognition performance in noise for young normal-hearing and older hearing impaired listeners. Ear Hear 2006; 27 (3) 263-278
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 52 Humes LE, Burk MH, Strauser LE, Kinney DL. Development and efficacy of a frequent-word auditory training protocol for older adults with impaired hearing. Ear Hear 2009; 30 (5) 613-627
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 53 Hayes EA, Warrier CM, Nicol TG, Zecker SG, Kraus N. Neural plasticity following auditory training in children with learning problems. Clin Neurophysiol 2003; 114 (4) 673-684
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 54 Warrier CM, Johnson KL, Hayes EA, Nicol T, Kraus N. Learning impaired children exhibit timing deficits and training-related improvements in auditory cortical responses to speech in noise. Exp Brain Res 2004; 157 (4) 431-441
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 55 Cognitive Concepts I. Earobics. Evanston, IL: Cognitive Concepts, Inc.; 1999
    Google Scholar
  • 56 Rhebergen KS, Versfeld NJ, Dreschler WA. Learning effect observed for the speech reception threshold in interrupted noise with normal hearing listeners. Int J Audiol 2008; 47 (4) 185-188
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 57 Sullivan JR, Thibodeau L, Assmann P. Auditory training in interrupted noise and improvements in speech recognition in noise for children with hearing impairment. J Acoust Soc Am 2013; 133 (1) 495-501
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 58 Billings CJ, Tremblay KL, Miller CW. Aided cortical auditory evoked potentials in response to changes in hearing aid gain. Int J Audiol 2011; 50 (7) 459-467
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 59 Marynewich S, Jenstad LM, Stapells DR. Slow cortical potentials and amplification-part I: n1-p2 measures. Int J Otolaryngol 2012; :921513.doi:10
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 60 Clendon S, Flynn MC, Coombes T. Facilitating speech and language development in children with cochlear implants using computer technology. Cochlear Implants Int 2003; 4 (3) 119-136
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 61 Schopmeyer B, Mellon N, Dobaj H, Grant G, Niparko JK. Use of fast For word to enhance language development in children with cochlear implants. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 2000; 185: 95-98
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 62 Zwolan T, Connor C, Kileny P. Evaluation of the foundations in speech perception software as a hearing rehabilitation tool for use at home. JARA 2000; 33: 39-51
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 63 Gillam R , et al. The efficacy of Fast For Word language intervention in school-age children with language impairment: a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 2008; 51: 97-111
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar