Semin Respir Crit Care Med 2013; 34(03): 275-280
DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1348461
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Impact of the Lung Allocation Score

Pamela J. McShane
1   Section of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
,
Edward R. Garrity Jr.
1   Section of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
02 July 2013 (online)

Abstract

The number of donors falls short of the number of patients on the wait list for lung transplantation making it necessary to ration the available donor organs. The ideal allocation system is guided by ethical principles and scientifically accurate at identifying patients who will gain the greatest degree of benefit from receiving the organ, in terms of both pre- and posttransplantation survival. The lung allocation score (LAS) was developed in 2005 to reduce mortality on the wait list, prioritize candidates based on urgency, minimize the role of geography, and maximize transplant benefit. The LAS has not made much of an impact on the geographic disparity of listing patients for lung transplantation, but it did achieve the goal of reducing wait-list mortality and prioritizing patients based on urgency. In prioritizing patients with the most urgent status, a new controversy has come into the forefront: whether or not the increased number of critically ill recipients maximizes transplant benefit. Despite the controversy, the LAS system is an improvement compared with the traditional first-come, first-served system, and it has even been adopted by Eurotransplant. In the future, as modifications are made to improve the LAS, the issue of critically ill patients and maximizing posttransplant benefit will be the focus.

 
  • References

  • 1 Christie JD, Edwards LB, Kucheryavaya AY , et al; International Society of Heart and Lung Transplantation. The Registry of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation: 29th adult lung and heart-lung transplant report-2012. J Heart Lung Transplant 2012; 31 (10) 1073-1086
  • 2 Egan TM, Murray S, Bustami RT , et al. Development of the new lung allocation system in the United States. Am J Transplant 2006; 6 (5 Pt 2) 1212-1227
  • 3 Yusen RD, Shearon TH, Qian Y , et al. Lung transplantation in the United States, 1999-2008. Am J Transplant 2010; 10 (4, Pt 2) 1047-1068
  • 4 Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network. Annual Data Report. 2010 http://srtr.transplant.hrsa.gov/annual_reports/2010/flash/06_lung/index.html . Accessed November 12, 2012
  • 5 Snell GI, Levvey BJ, Oto T , et al. Early lung transplantation success utilizing controlled donation after cardiac death donors. Am J Transplant 2008; 8 (6) 1282-1289
  • 6 Iribarne A, Russo MJ, Davies RR , et al. Despite decreased wait-list times for lung transplantation, lung allocation scores continue to increase. Chest 2009; 135 (4) 923-928
  • 7 Merlo CA, Weiss ES, Orens JB , et al. Impact of U.S. Lung Allocation Score on survival after lung transplantation. J Heart Lung Transplant 2009; 28 (8) 769-775
  • 8 Russo MJ, Iribarne A, Hong KN , et al. High lung allocation score is associated with increased morbidity and mortality following transplantation. Chest 2010; 137 (3) 651-657
  • 9 Vermeijden JW, Zijlstra JG, Erasmus ME, van der Bij W, Verschuuren EA. Lung transplantation for ventilator-dependent respiratory failure. J Heart Lung Transplant 2009; 28 (4) 347-351
  • 10 Algar FJ, Alvarez A, Lama R , et al. Lung transplantation in patients under mechanical ventilation. Transplant Proc 2003; 35 (2) 737-738
  • 11 Mason DP, Thuita L, Nowicki ER, Murthy SC, Pettersson GB, Blackstone EH. Should lung transplantation be performed for patients on mechanical respiratory support? The US experience. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010; 139 (3) 765-773 , e1
  • 12 Cypel M, Yeung JC, Keshavjee S. Novel approaches to expanding the lung donor pool: donation after cardiac death and ex vivo conditioning. Clin Chest Med 2011; 32 (2) 233-244
  • 13 Cypel M, Sato M, Yildirim E , et al. Initial experience with lung donation after cardiocirculatory death in Canada. J Heart Lung Transplant 2009; 28 (8) 753-758
  • 14 Cypel M, Yeung JC, Liu M , et al. Normothermic ex vivo lung perfusion in clinical lung transplantation. N Engl J Med 2011; 364 (15) 1431-1440
  • 15 De Oliveira NC, Osaki S, Maloney JD , et al. Lung transplantation with donation after cardiac death donors: long-term follow-up in a single center. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010; 139 (5) 1306-1315
  • 16 Russo MJ, Worku B, Iribarne A , et al. Does lung allocation score maximize survival benefit from lung transplantation?. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2011; 141 (5) 1270-1277
  • 17 Thabut G, Munson J, Haynes K, Harhay MO, Christie JD, Halpern SD. Geographic disparities in access to lung transplantation before and after implementation of the lung allocation score. Am J Transplant 2012; 12 (11) 3085-3093
  • 18 Langer RM, Cohen B, Rahmel A. History of Eurotransplant. Transplant Proc 2012; 44 (7) 2130-2131
  • 19 Smits JM, Vanhaecke J, Haverich A , et al. Waiting for a thoracic transplant in Eurotransplant. Transpl Int 2006; 19 (1) 54-66
  • 20 Smits JM, Nossent GD, de Vries E , et al. Evaluation of the lung allocation score in highly urgent and urgent lung transplant candidates in Eurotransplant. J Heart Lung Transplant 2011; 30 (1) 22-28