Geographical Information Systems for Mapping Maternal Ground Transport to Level III Care Neonatal Centers

Steffen A. Brown; Michael E. Richards; Erika C. Elwell; William F. Rayburn

doi:10.1055/s-0033-1348029

American Journal of Perinatology, Table of Contents

Am J Perinatol 2014; 31(04): 287-292
DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1348029

Original Article

Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Geographical Information Systems for Mapping Maternal Ground Transport to Level III Care Neonatal Centers

Steffen A. Brown

¹Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, New Mexico

,

Michael E. Richards

²Emergency Medicine, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, New Mexico

,

Erika C. Elwell

¹Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, New Mexico

,

William F. Rayburn

¹Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, New Mexico

› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Objective The objective of this investigation was to determine maternal ground transport times from community hospitals to the nearest hospital offering comprehensive (level III) neonatal care within the contiguous United States.

Study Design This observational study combined data from the 2010 U.S. Census tract and 2010 American Hospital Association Annual Survey. Level III (full complement of care) neonatal centers were plotted using 2010 geographical information systems (GIS) mapping software (ESRI, Redland, California, United States). Locations of level I (uncomplicated care) and level II (limited complicated care) centers and residences of reproductive-aged women (18 to 39 years old) were mapped to identify maternal ground transport times to level III centers.

Results Most of the 584 level III neonatal centers were located in metropolitan areas (83.5%). The proportions of level I and level II hospitals within a 30-minute drive of a level III neonatal center were 19.8 and 47.3%, and 52.2 and 69.8% were within a 60-minute drive time. Ground transport times were shortest in the Northeast and metropolitan areas, and longest in the rural Great Plains and noncoastal West.

Conclusion GIS mapping enables health providers and health policy makers to better understand maternal ground transport times to current and future regional hospitals offering level III neonatal services.

Keywords

comprehensive care - geographical information systems (GIS) - ground transport - health care access - neonatal center

Full Text

References

References
1 Rayburn WF, Richards ME, Elwell EC. Drive times to hospitals with perinatal care in the United States. Obstet Gynecol 2012; 119: 611-616
2 American Hospital Association, Annual Survey Database Fiscal Year [CD-ROM]. 2010. Chicago, IL: AHA Resource Center;
3 Guidelines for Perinatal Care. 6th ed. Elk Grove Village, IL: American Academy of Pediatrics, and Washington DC: Am Coll Obstet Gynecol. 2007: 11-12
4 American Hospital Association. The Dartmouth Atlas of Health Care in the United States. Chicago, IL: AHA Publishing; 1996
5 Office of Management and Budget, Standards for Defining Metropolitan and Micropolitan Statistical Areas, Notice, 65 Federal Register 249 (December 27, 2000), pp. 82228–82238
6 Hall SA, Kaufman JS, Ricketts TC. Defining urban and rural areas in U.S. epidemiologic studies. J Urban Health 2006; 83: 162-175
7 Desbiens NA. The reporting of statistics in medical educational studies: an observational study. BMC Med Res Methodol 2007; 7: 35
8 Ravelli AC, Jager KJ, de Groot MH , et al. Travel time from home to hospital and adverse perinatal outcomes in women at term in the Netherlands. BJOG 2011; 118: 457-465
9 Diaz MA, Hendey GW, Bivins HG. When is the helicopter faster? A comparison of helicopter and ground ambulance transport times. J Trauma 2005; 58: 148-153
10 Graves BA. Integrative literature review: a review of literature related to geographical information systems, healthcare access, and health outcomes. Perspect Health Inf Manag 2008; 5: 11
11 Young JS, Bassam D, Cephas GA, Brady WJ, Butler K, Pomphrey M. Interhospital versus direct scene transfer of major trauma patients in a rural trauma system. Am Surg 1998; 64: 88-91 , discussion 91–92
12 Rogers FB, Osler TM, Shackford SR, Cohen M, Camp L, Lesage M. Study of the outcome of patients transferred to a level I hospital after stabilization at an outlying hospital in a rural setting. J Trauma 1999; 46: 328-333
13 Saposnik G, Fang J, O'Donnell M, Hachinski V, Kapral MK, Hill MD. Investigators of the Registry of the Canadian Stroke Network (RCSN) for the Stroke Outcome Research Canada (SORCan) Working Group. Escalating levels of access to in-hospital care and stroke mortality. Stroke 2008; 39: 2522-2530
14 Klein MB, Kramer CB, Nelson J, Rivara FP, Gibran NS, Concannon T. Geographic access to burn center hospitals. JAMA 2009; 302: 1774-1781
15 United States Census Bureau, Geographic Division. Cartographic products management branch. 2001 Census block groups cartographic boundary files descriptions and metadata. Available at: http://www.census.gov/geo/www/cob/bg_metadata.html . Retrieved December 8, 2010.