Drug Res (Stuttg) 2013; 63(09): 477-483
DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1347235
Original Article
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Bioequivalence Studies for Two Different Strengths of Montelukast in Healthy Volunteers: 10 mg Film-coated Tablets and 5 mg Chewable Tablets

P. Pedroso
1   Medical Department, Tecnimede S.A., Sintra, Portugal
,
S. Almeida
1   Medical Department, Tecnimede S.A., Sintra, Portugal
2   Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Universidad Autonoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
,
A. Filipe
1   Medical Department, Tecnimede S.A., Sintra, Portugal
,
R. I. Neves
1   Medical Department, Tecnimede S.A., Sintra, Portugal
,
S. Boudreault
3   Pharmacokinetics Department, PharmaNet Canada, Inc., Québec, Canada
,
C. Jiménez
4   Bioanalytical Department Anapharm Europe S.L.U Barcelona, Spain
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

received 18 January 2013

accepted 26 April 2013

Publication Date:
18 June 2013 (online)

Preview

Abstract

In order to assess the bioequivalence of 2 different formulations of montelukast, a pivotal trial for the montelukast 10 mg film-coated tablets formulation and a pivotal trial for the montelukast 5 mg chewable tablets formulation were conducted.

For the 10 mg study, 34 healthy subjects were enrolled in a single centre, randomised, single-dose, open-label, 2-way crossover study, with a minimum washout period of 7 days, while for the 5 mg study, 42 healthy subjects were included in another study with a similar design. For both studies, plasma samples were collected up to 24 h post-dosing and drug levels were determined by reverse liquid chromatography and detected by tandem mass spectrometry detection.

Pharmacokinetic parameters used for bioequivalence assessment, area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to time of last non-zero concentration (AUC0–t) and from time zero to infinity (AUC0–inf) and maximum observed concentration (Cmax), were determined from the drug concentration data using non-compartmental analysis.

In the 10 mg study, the 90% confidence intervals obtained by analysis of variance were 99.62–120.51% for Cmax, 102.25–117.37% for AUC0–t and 101.96–116.67% for AUC0–inf, which were within the predefined acceptable range of 80.00–125.00%.

In the 5 mg study, the 90% confidence intervals were 91.14–98.46% for Cmax, 93.02–98.42% for AUC0–t and 93.09–98.63% for AUC0–inf, which were within the predefined acceptable range of 80.00–125.00%.

Bioequivalence between formulations was concluded both in terms of rate and extent of absorption for both strengths.