Int J Sports Med 2013; 34(09): 800-805
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1331197
Training & Testing
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

High-Intensity Re-Warm-Ups Enhance Soccer Performance

J. Zois
1   School of Sport and Exercise Science, Institute of Sport, Exercise and Active Learning (ISEAL), Victoria University, ­Melbourne, ­Australia
2   Institute of Sport, Exercise and Active Learning (ISEAL), Victoria University, ­Melbourne, ­Australia
,
D. Bishop
2   Institute of Sport, Exercise and Active Learning (ISEAL), Victoria University, ­Melbourne, ­Australia
,
I. Fairweather
1   School of Sport and Exercise Science, Institute of Sport, Exercise and Active Learning (ISEAL), Victoria University, ­Melbourne, ­Australia
,
K. Ball
1   School of Sport and Exercise Science, Institute of Sport, Exercise and Active Learning (ISEAL), Victoria University, ­Melbourne, ­Australia
2   Institute of Sport, Exercise and Active Learning (ISEAL), Victoria University, ­Melbourne, ­Australia
,
R. J. Aughey
1   School of Sport and Exercise Science, Institute of Sport, Exercise and Active Learning (ISEAL), Victoria University, ­Melbourne, ­Australia
2   Institute of Sport, Exercise and Active Learning (ISEAL), Victoria University, ­Melbourne, ­Australia
3   Western Bulldogs Football Club, Melborne, Australia
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History



accepted after revision 22 October 2012

Publication Date:
26 February 2013 (online)

Preview

Abstract

The effects of high-intensity, short-duration, re-warm-ups on team-sport-related performance were investigated. In a randomised, cross-over study, participants performed 2×26-min periods of an intermittent activity protocol (IAP) on a non-motorized treadmill, interspersed by 15-min of passive recovery (CON); 3-min small-sided game (SSG); or a 5RM leg-press. Measures included counter-movement jump, repeated-sprint, the Loughborough soccer passing test (LSPT), blood lactate concentration, heart-rate, and perceptual measures. Data were analyzed using effect size (90% confidence intervals), and percentage change; determining magnitudes of effects. A 5RM re-warm-up improved flight-time to contraction-time ratio when compared to SSG (9.8%, ES; 0.5±0.3) and CON (ES: 9.4%, 0.7±0.5) re-warm-ups, remaining higher following the second IAP (8.8%, ES; 0.5±0.3 and 10.2%, ES; 0.6±0.6, respectively). Relative-maximum rate-of-force development was greater in the 5RM condition following the second IAP compared to SSG (29.3%, ES; 0.7±0.5) and CON (16.2%, ES; 0.6±0.6). Repeated-sprint ability during the second IAP improved in the 5RM re-warm-up; peak velocity, mean velocity, and acceleration were 4, 3, and 18% greater, respectively. Within groups, the SSG re-warm-up improved LSPT performance post-intervention; 6.4% (ES: 0.6±0.8) and following the second IAP 6.2% (ES: 0.6±0.6), compared to pre-intervention. A 5RM leg-press re-warm-up improved physical performance, while a SSG re-warm-up enhanced skill execution following standardized intermittent exercise.

Supplementary Material