Hebamme, Table of Contents Hebamme 2012; 25(4): 236-240DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1320142 Schwangerschaft Schwangerenvorsorge Hippokrates Verlag in MVS Medizinverlage Stuttgart GmbH & Co. KG StuttgartHebammengeleitete Schwangerenvorsorge im Vergleich zu anderen Betreuungsmodellen Anna Maria Rath Hebamme, London› Author AffiliationsRecommend Article Abstract Buy Article Weltweit sind verschiedene Berufsgruppen an der Schwangerenvorsorge beteiligt. Meist sind dies Gynäkologen, Allgemeinmediziner und/oder Hebammen. Welche Unterschiede gibt es zwischen den einzelnen Modellen bei den Outcomes in der Betreuung von low-risk Schwangeren? Full Text References Literatur 1 Bernloehr A, Smith P, Vydelingum V. Antenatal care in the European Union: A survey on guidelines in all 25 member states of the Community. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology 2005; 122(1): 22-32 2 Blanchette H. Comparison of obstetric outcome of a primary-care access clinic staffed by certified nurse-midwives and a private practice group of obstetricians in the same community. American Journal of Obstetrics and gynecology 1995; 172(6): 1864-1871 3 Di Mario S et al. What is the effectiveness of antenatal care?. [Supplement] Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe. (Health Evidence Network report) 2005 http://www.euro.who.int/_data/assets/pdf_file/0005/74660/E87997.pdf 4 Dowswell T, Carroli G, Duley L, Gates S, Gülmezoglu AM, Khan-Neelofur D, Piaggio GG. Alternative versus standard packages of antenatal care for low-risk pregnancy [elektronische Version]. 2010 Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (10) 5 Europäische Union. Directive 2005/36/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 September 2005 on the Recognition of Professional Qualifications. 2005 http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2005:255:0022:0142:en:PDF 6 Hatem M, Sandall J, Devane D, Soltani H, Gates S. Midwife-led versus other models of care for childbearing women [elektronische Version]. 2009 Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (3) 7 HebG (Bundesgesetz über den Hebammenberuf). 1994 (Österreichisches Bundesrecht) http://www.ris.bka.gv.at/GeltendeFassung.wxe?Abfrage=Bundesnormen&Gesetzesnummer=10010804&ShowPrintPreview=True 8 Hauptverband der Österreichischen Sozialversicherungsträger. Hebammen-Gesamtvertrag 2010. https://www.avsv.at/avi/dokument/pdf_dokumentanzeige_frameset.xhtml?dokid=2010%3D305&dokStat=0&csrId=2718&tlId=1295456194187 9 KBGG (Kinderbetreuungsgeldgesetz) 2001. (Österreichisches Bundesrecht) http://www.ris.bka.gv.at/GeltendeFassung/Bundesnormen/20001474/KBGG%2c%20Fassung%20vom%2013.12.2011.pdf 10 MuKiPassV (Mutter-Kind-Pass-Verordnung) 2002. (Österreichischer Bundesminister für soziale Sicherheit und Generationen) http://www.ris.bka.gv.at/GeltendeFassung/Bundesnormen/20001694/MuKiPassV%2c%20Fassung%20vom%2013.12.2011.pdf 11 NICE. Antenatal care: routine care for the healthy pregnant woman. 2008 http://www.nice.org.uk/nicemedia/live/11947/40145/40145.pdf 12 O’Brien B, Harvey S, Sommerfeldt S, Beischel S, Newburn-Cook C, Schopflocher D. Comparison of costs and associated outcomes between women choosing newly integrated autonomous midwifery care and matched controls: a pilot study. Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology Canada 2010; 32(7): 650-656 13 O’Brien B, Chalmers B, Fell D, Heaman M, Darling EK, Herbert P. The Experience of Pregnancy and Birth with Midwives: Results from the Canadian Maternity Experiences Survey. Birth 2011; 38(3): 207-215 14 Oakley D, Murtland T, Mayes F, Hayashi R, Petersen BA, Rorie C, Andersen F. Processes of care: Comparisons of certified Nurse-Midwives and Obstetricians. Journal of Nurse Midwifery 1995; 40(5): 399-409 15 RCOG. Standards for Maternity Care-Report of a Working Party. 2008 http://www.connectingforhealth.nhs.uk/engagement/clinical/ncls/midwives/rcogstandards.pdf 16 Turnbull D, Baghurst P, Collins C, Cornwell C, Nixon A, Donnelan-Fernandez R, Antoniou G. An evaluation of Midwifery Group Practice. . Part I: Clinical effectiveness Women and Birth 2009; 22(1): 3-9