Path to the Interpeduncular Fossa: Anatomical Comparison of Endoscopic-Assisted versus Standard Subtemporal Approach

Abstract

Objective The aim of this study was to assess the assumed advantage of endoscopic assistance to the standard subtemporal approach. The idea was to measure qualitatively and quantitatively visibility versus operability.

Design We performed eight subtemporal dissections on four cadaver heads. Our dissections integrated an operating microscope, endoscope, and neuronavigation. Comparison was made between visibility and operability afforded by the microscope alone or by the microscope–endoscope combination. Visibility was recorded as complete or incomplete and was quantified for key structures using linear measurements taken by the navigation system. Operability was determined by whichever maneuvers could be safely and comfortably accomplished in the space afforded.

Results From our survey, the structures whose visibility most benefitted from the addition of the endoscope include: contralateral third nerve, posterior perforated substance, mammillary bodies, and contralateral superior cerebellar artery. With regard to quantitative evaluation, we found increased visibility of both basilar artery and posterior cerebral artery. With regard to the operability, no objective advantage was afforded by the addition of the endoscope. Subjectively, the maneuvers were easier to perform while using the endoscope.

Conclusion Using the endoscope as an assistance tool during conducting classical subtemporal approach can help in overcome a lot of the classical subtemporal approach limitations.

Keywords

subtemporal - endoscope - endoscope-assisted - interpeduncular - operability

• References

• 1 Hernesniemi J, Ishii K, Karatas A , et al. Surgical technique to retract the tentorial edge during subtemporal approach: technical note. Neurosurgery 2005; 57 (4, Suppl) E408 , discussion E408
• 2 Spiller WG, Frazier CH. The division of the sensory root of the trigeminus for relief of tic douloureaux: an experimental pathological and clinical study with a preliminary report of one surgical successful case. Phila Med J 1901; 8: 1039-1049
• 3 Wen DY, Heros RC. Surgical approaches to the brain stem. Neurosurg Clin N Am 1993; 4 (3) 457-468
• 4 Rhoton AL. Tentorial incisura. Neurosurgery 2000; 47: 131-153
• 5 Knosp E, Tschabitscher M, Matula C, Koos WT. Modifications of temporal approaches: anatomical aspects of a microsurgical approach. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1991; 53: 159-165
• 6 Ardeshiri A, Ardeshiri A, Wenger E, Holtmannspötter M, Winkler PA. Subtemporal approach to the tentorial incisura: normative morphometric data based on magnetic resonance imaging scans. Neurosurgery 2006; 58 (1, Suppl) ONS22-ONS28 , discussion ONS22–ONS28
• 7 Hernesniemi J, Ishii K, Niemelä M, Kivipelto L, Fujiki M, Shen H. Subtemporal approach to basilar bifurcation aneurysms: advanced technique and clinical experience. Acta Neurochir Suppl (Wien) 2005; 94 (Suppl) 31-38
• 8 Pichierri A, D'Avella E, Ruggeri A, Tschabitscher M, Delfini R. Endoscopic assistance in the epidural subtemporal approach and Kawase approach: anatomic study. Neurosurgery 2010; 67 (3, Suppl Operative) ons29-ons37 , discussion ons37
• 9 Salma A, Wang S, Ammirati M. Extradural endoscope-assisted subtemporal posterior clinoidectomy: a cadaver investigation study. Neurosurgery 2010; 67 (3, Suppl Operative) ons43-ons48 , discussion ons48
• 10 Ammirati M, Ma J, Becker D, Black K, Cheatham M, Bloch J. Transzygomatic approach to the tentorial incisura: surgical anatomy. Skull Base Surg 1992; 2 (3) 161-166
• 11 Gonzalez LF, Amin-Hanjani S, Bambakidis NC, Spetzler RF. Skull base approaches to the basilar artery. Neurosurg Focus 2005; 19 (2) E3