Writing Instruction in Elementary Classrooms: Making the Connection to Common Core State Standards

Abstract

This study used a survey of primary general education teachers to examine the frequency of writing instructional activities and the genres composed most frequently by students in these classrooms. Surveys were completed by first-, third-, and fifth-grade general education teachers, with questions addressing writing activities, writing instruction, instructional strategies, writing genres, and writing environment. Means of teacher responses were calculated for each grade level to determine how many days per school year each activity occurred. To better understand the changes that occur in writing instructional practices and genres across grade levels, these means are compared and shifts are discussed. Results of this study revealed that the frequency of writing instructional practices and genre usage change across the primary grade levels, but that great variation also exists among teachers at each grade level. Links among the survey results, the Common Core State Standards for writing, and best practices for writing instruction will be made.

Keywords

primary education - writing instruction - writing genres - students with disabilities - Common Core State Standards - language/literacy

• References

• 1 Sturm JM, Spadorcia SA, Cunningham JW , et al. What happens to reading between first and third grade? Implications for students who use AAC. Augment Altern Commun 2006; 22: 21-36
• 2 Common Core State Standards Initiative. Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts & Literacy in History/Social Studies, Science, and Technical Subjects. Washington, DC: National Governors Association Center for Best Practices and the Council of Chief State School Officers; 2010
• 3 Russell DR. Historical studies on composition. In: Smagorinsky P, ed. Research on Composition: Multiple Perspectives on Two Decades of Change. New York, NY: Teachers College Press; 2006: 243-275
• 4 Pressley M, Rankin J, Yokoi L. A survey of instructional practices of primary teachers nominated as effective in promoting literacy. Elem Sch J 1996; 96: 363-384
• 5 Pressley M, Yokoi L, Rankin J, Wharton-McDonald R, Mistretta J. A survey of instructional practices of grade 5 teachers nominated as effective in promoting literacy. Sci Stud Read 1997; 1: 145-160
• 6 Pressley M, Allington R, Morrow L , et al. The Nature of Effective First-Grade Literacy Instruction (Report Series 11007). Albany, NY: University of Albany Center on English Learning & Achievement; 1998
• 7 Pressley M, Wharton-McDonald R, Mistretta-Hampston J, Echevarria M. Literacy instruction in 10 fourth- and fifth-grade classrooms in upstate New York. Sci Stud Read 1998; 2: 159-194
• 8 National Commission on Writing. Writing and school reform. Available at: http://www.writingcommission.org/report.html . Accessed January 31, 2010
• 9 Paulsen KJ. School-based collaboration. An introduction to the collaboration column. Interv Sch Clin 2008; 43: 313-315
• 10 U.S. Department of Education. Thirtieth annual report to Congress on the implementation of the individuals with disabilities education act, 2008. Available at: http://www2.ed.gov/about/reports/annual/osep/2008/parts-b-c/index.html . Accessed January 1, 2012
• 11 Chapman M. Preschool through elementary writing. In: Smagorinsky P, ed. Research on Composition: Multiple Perspectives on Two Decades of Change. New York, NY: Teachers College Press; 2006: 15-47
• 12 Dillman DA. Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method. New York, NY: Wiley; 1999
• 13 Cole C, Palmer R, Schwanz D. Improving the mail return rates of SASS surveys: a review of the literature (Working Paper No. 97–18. Project Officer, Steven Kauffman). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education; 1997
• 14 Cunningham PM, Cunningham JW, Hall DP, Moore SA. Writing the Four-Blocks Way. Greensboro, NC: Carson Dellosa; 2005
• 15 Bereiter C. Development in writing. In: Gregg LW, Steinberg ER, eds. Cognitive Processes in Writing. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1980: 73-93
• 16 Harris KR, Graham S. Making the Writing Process Work: Strategies for Composition and Self-Regulation. Brookline, MA: Brookline Books; 1996
• 17 Bear DR, Invernizzi M, Templeton S, Johnston F. Words Their Way: Word Study for Phonics, Vocabulary, and Spelling Instruction, 4th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall; 2007
• 18 Graham S, Harris K. Best practices in teaching planning. In: Graham S, MacArthur C, Fitzgerald J, eds. Best Practices in Writing Instruction. New York, NY: Guilford Press; 2007: 119-140
• 19 Commission on Reading. Becoming a Nation of Readers: The Report of the Commission on Reading. Washington, DC: The National Institute of Education; 1985
• 20 Braddock R, Lloyd-Jones R, Schoer L. Quoted in: Hillocks G. Research on Writing Composition: New Directions for Teaching. Urbana, IL: National Conference on Research of English; 1986: 133
• 21 Hillocks G. Research on Writing Composition: New Directions for Teaching. Urbana, IL: National Conference on Research of English; 1986