Arzneimittelforschung 2012; 62(03): 134-137
DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1298012
Original Article
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Bioequivalence Studies of 2 Oral Cefaclor Capsule Formulations in Chinese Healthy Subjects

J. Chen
1   Division of Clinical of Pharmacology, 2nd Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, P. R. China
,
B. Jiang
1   Division of Clinical of Pharmacology, 2nd Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, P. R. China
,
H. Lou
1   Division of Clinical of Pharmacology, 2nd Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, P. R. China
,
L. Yu
1   Division of Clinical of Pharmacology, 2nd Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, P. R. China
,
Z. Ruan
1   Division of Clinical of Pharmacology, 2nd Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, P. R. China
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

received 25. November 2011

accepted 05. Dezember 2011

Publikationsdatum:
27. Januar 2012 (online)

Abstract

An open-label, single-dose, randomized, crossover study was carried out in 20 Chinese healthy male subjects to compare the pharmacokinetics of 2 cefaclor (CAS 53994-73-3) formulations after administration of a single 250 mg dose of each drug with a 1-week wash-out period. Blood samples were collected before and with 6 h after drug administration. Plasma concentrations were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with UV detector. 2 formulations were evaluated using the following pharmacokinetic parameters: AUC0–t, Cmax and tmax was analyzed nonparametrically. The 90% confidence interval (CI) of the ratios (teat/reference) of log-transformed AUC0–t and Cmax fell within the bioequivalence acceptance range of 80–125%. The results showed that the 90% CI of the ratios of AUC0–t and Cmax were 105.1% (101.0–109.4%) and 92.4% (82.5–103.4%), respectively, which therefore could conclude 2 oral cefaclor capsule formulations of cefaclor are bioequivalent. Both treatments showed similar tolerability and safety.

 
  • References

  • 1 Burt R, Meyers MD. Cefaclor revisited. Clin Ther 2000; 22: 154-166
  • 2 Sader HS, Jacobs MR, Fritsche TR. Review of the spectrum and potency of orally administeredcephalosporins and amoxicillin/clavulanate. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2007; 57: 5-12
  • 3 Sourgens H, Derendorf H, Schifferer H. Pharmacokinetic profile of cefaclor. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther 1997; 35: 374-380
  • 4 Good Clinical Practice Consolidated Guideline . International Conference on Harmonisation, E6. 1996;
  • 5 Jiang B, Ruan ZR, Lou HG et al. Determination of cefaclor in human plasma by reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography with UV detection and its application to the bioequivalence studies. Anal Lett 2009; 42: 2170-2179
  • 6 Guidelines for bioavailability and bioequivalence studies of human drug products . State Food and Drug Administration (SFDA, China). 2005;