PDF herunterladen
Arzneimittelforschung 2010; 60(2): 57-63
DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1296249
Reviews
Editio Cantor Verlag Aulendorf (Germany)

Multimorbidity and polypharmacy: Which betablocker to use in relation to the pharmacokinetic profile and interaction potential

Martin Wehling
1   Clinical Pharmacology Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Publikationsdatum:
09. Dezember 2011 (online)

   Lizenzen und Reprints

Abstract

Betablockers still represent widely prescribed drugs as they cover a wide spectrum of cardiovascular indications. Obviously, it is not trivial which betablocker to choose as they differ both with regard to their pharmacodynamic (e. g. selective vs. nonselective, beta vs. beta + alpha blocking activities) and pharmacokinetic profiles. Latter is largely governed by the metabolic properties, and, thus, their excretion route (renal or biliary route in unchanged or metabolized form). In the elderly population, the stability of plasma concentrations is particularly essential as this population has smaller compensatory tolerance to concentration variations than younger patients. The interaction potential of betablockers with regard to drug-drug, gene polymorphism-drug, excreting organ-drug interactions varies widely between individual substances. Compounds predominantly metabolized by polymorphic cytochromes such as CYP 2D6 are affected by the metabolizer status and competing compounds utilizing the same metabolic pathways can strongly influence plasma levels (examples metoprolol [CAS 37350-58-6], carvedilol [CAS 72956-09-3]). On the other hand, metabolically stable compounds which are predominantly excreted renally may be unfavourable as their plasma concentrations largely depend on renal function which may be blunted in elderly patients. The prototype of this category, atenolol (CAS 29122-68-7), has been associated with inferior results in mortality trials in hypertension treatment.

Thus, a favourable compound should be partially stable in regard to metabolismto depend less on drug-drug and gene-drug interactions, but also utilize more than one routes of excretion, meaning both the direct renal and the metabolic routes. The prototype for this type of betablocker is bisoprolol (CAS 66722-44-9).

Key words

Betablockers - Interactions - Multimorbidity - Polypharmacy
 

  • References

  • 1 Kaufman DW, Kelly JP, Rosenberg L, Anderson TE, Mitchell AA. Recent patterns of medication use in the ambulatory adult population of the United States: the Slone survey. JAMA. 2002; 287: 337-44
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 2 Lazarou J, Pomeranz BH Corey PN Incidence of adverse drug reactions in hospitalized patients: a meta-analysis of prospective studies. JAMA. 1998; 279: 1200-5
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 3 World Population Prospects: the 2008 Revision Population Database, medium variant. c 2009 - [cited 26 November 2009]. Available from: http:llesa.un.org/unppl
    PubMed
  • 4 Glaeske G, Schicktanz C, Janhsen K. GEK-Arzneimittel-Re-port 2008, Schriftenreihe zur Gesundheitsanalyse. Band 61. St. Augustin (Germany): Asgard-Verlag; 2008
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 5 Franciosa JA. Beta-adrenergic blocking agents: past, present, and future perspectives. Coron Artery Dis. 1999; 10: 369-76
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 6 Packer M, Bristow MR, Cohn JN, Colucci WS, Fowler MB, Gilbert EM et al. The effect of carvedilol on morbidity and mortality in patients with chronic heart failure. U.S. Carvedilol Heart Failure Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1996; 334: 1349-55
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 7 Northcote RJ, Ballantyne D. Beta-adrenoceptor blockade and intrinsic sympathomimetic activity-relevance in the treatment of ischaemic heart disease. Scott Med J. 1993; 30: 205-15
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 8 Christ M, Wehling M. Betablocking agents in patients with coronary artery disease and myocardial infarction. In: Böhm M, Laragh J, Zehender P. editors From hypertension to heart failure. Berlin: Springer; 1998: 90-129
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 9 Wagner F, Kalusche D, Trenk D, Jähnchen E, Roskamm H. Drug interaction between propafenone and metoprolol. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1987; 24: 213-20
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 10 Walley T, Pirmohamed M, Proudlove C, Maxwell D. Interaction of metoprolol and fluoxetine. Lancet. 1993; 341 (8850) 967-8
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 11 Goryachkina K, Burbello A, Boldueva S, Babak S, Bergman U, Bertilsson L. Inhibition of metoprolol metabolism and potentiation of its effects by paroxetine in routinely treated patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2008; 64: 275-82
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 12 Brodde OE, Kroemer HK. Drug-drug interactions of beta-adrenoceptor blockers. Arzneimittelforschung. 2003; 53 (12) 814-22
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 13 Scheen AJ. Pharma-clinics medication of the month. Nebivolol (Nobiten). Rev Med Liege. 2001; 56: 788-91
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 14 Reynolds RD, Gorczynski RJ, Quon CY. Pharmacology and pharmacokinetics of esmolol. Clin Pharmacol. 1986; 26 (A) A3-A14
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 15 Zhou HH, Wood AJ. Stereoselective disposition of carvedilol is determined by CYP2D6. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1995; 57: 518-24
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 16 Meyer UA. Pharmacogenetics: the slow, the rapid, and the ultrarapid. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1994; 91: 1983-4
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 17 Bertilsson L, Dahl ML, Tybring G. Pharmacogenetics of antidepressants: clinical aspects. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1997; 391 (Suppl) 14-21
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 18 Poolsup N, LiWanPo A, Knight TL. Pharmacogenetics and Psychopharmacotherapy. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2000; 25: 197-220
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 19 Lewis DF. Watson E, Lake BG. Evolution of the cytochrome P450 superfamily: sequence alignments and pharmacogenetics. Mutat Res. 1998; 410: 245-70
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 20 Lennard MS, Silas JH, Freestone S, Ramsay LE, Tucker GT, Woods HF. Oxidation phenotype-a major determinant of metoprolol metabolism and response. N Engl J Med. 1982; 307: 1558-60
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 21 Wuttke H, Rau T, Heide R, Bergmann K, Bohm M, Weil J et al. Increased frequency of cytochrome P450 2D6 poor metabolizers among patients with metoprolol-associated adverse effects. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2002; 72: 429-37
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 22 Rau T, Heide R, Bergmann K, Wuttke H, Werner U, Feifel N et al. Effect of CYP2D6 genotype on metoprolol metabolism persists during long-term treatment. Pharmacogenetics. 2002; 12: 465-72
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 23 Zineh I, Beitelshees AL, Gaedigk A, Walker JR, Pauly DF, Eberst K et al. Pharmacokinetics and CYP2D6 genotypes do not predict metoprolol adverse events or efficacy in hypertension. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2004; 76: 536-4
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 24 Fux R, Morike K, Prohmer AM, Delabar U, Schwab M, Schaeffeler E et al. Impact of CYP2D6 genotype on adverse effects during treatment with metoprolol: a prospective clinical study. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2005; 78: 378-87
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 25 Shin J, Johnson JA. Pharmacogenetics of betablockers. Pharmacotherapy. 2007; 27: 874-87
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 26 Damy T, Pousset F, Caplain H, Hulot JS, Lechat P. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions between metoprolol and dronedarone in extensive and poor CYP2D6 metabolizers healthy subjects. Fundam Clin Pharmacol. 2004; 18: 113-23
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 27 Goryachkina K, Burbello A, Boldueva S, Babak S, Bergman U, Bertilsson L. CYP2D6 is a major determinant of metoprolol disposition and effects in hospitalized Russian patients treated for acute myocardial infarction. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2008; 64: 1163-73
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 28 Horikiri Y, Suzuki T, Mizobe M. Stereoselective metabolism of bisoprolol enantiomers in dogs and humans. Life Sci. 1998; 63: 1097-108
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 29 Kirch W, Rose I, Klingmann I, Pabst J, Ohnhaus EE. Interaction of bisoprolol with cimetidine and rifampicin. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1986; 31: 59-62
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 30 Fachinfo Service [Internet]. „Fachinformation” Concor®; c2009 - [updated July 2008; cited 26 November 2009]. Available from: http://www.fachinfo.de/viewFI?FINR=003991&RL=Concor%26reg%3B%205%26nbsp%3Bmg/-10%26nbsp%3Bmg%20Filmtabletten
    PubMed
  • 31 Nozawa T, Taguchi M, Tahara K, Hashimoto Y, Igarashi N, Nonomura M et al. Influence of CYP2D6 genotype on metoprolol plasma concentration and beta-adrenergic inhibition during long-term treatment: a comparison with biso-prolol. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2005; 46: 713-20
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 32 Huang JD, Chuang SK, Cheng CL, Lai ML. Pharmacokinetics of metoprolol enantiomers in Chinese subjects of major CYP2D6 genotypes. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1999; 65: 402-7
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 33 Taguchi M, Nozawa T, Kameyama T, Inoue H, Takesono C, Mizukami A et al. Effect of CYP2D6*10 on pharmacokinetic variability of routinely administered metoprolol in middle-aged and elderly Japanese patients. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2003; 59: 385-8
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 34 POISE Study Group: Devereaux PJ Yang H, Yusuf S, Guyatt G, Leslie K, Villar JC. et al. Effects of extended-release metoprolol succinate in patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery (POISE trial): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2008; 371: 1839-1847
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 35 Bachmakov I, Werner U, Endress B, Auge D, Fromm MF. Characterization of beta-adrenoceptor antagonists as substrates and inhibitors of the drug transporter P-glycopro-tein. Fundam Clin Pharmacol. 2006; 20: 273-82
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 36 Klotz U. Pharmacokinetics and drug metabolism in the elderly. Drug Metab Rev. 2009; 41: 67-76
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 37 McAinsh J, Holmes BF, Smith S, Hood D, Warren D. Atenolol kinetics in renal failure. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1980; 28: 302-9
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 38 Cockcroft DW, Gault MH. Prediction of creatinine clearance from serum creatinine. Nephron. 1976; 16: 31-41
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 39 Calis KA, Young LR. Clinical analysis of adverse drug reactions. In: Atkinson AJ, Daniels CE, Dedrick RL, Grudzinskas CV, Markey SP. editors. Principles of Clinical Pharmacology. San Diego: Academic Press; 2001
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 40 Dahlöf B, Devereux RB, Kjeldsen SE, Julius S, Beevers G, deFaire U et al. Cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in the Losartan Intervention For Endpoint reduction in hypertension study (LIFE): a randomised trial against atenolol. Lancet. 2002; 359 (9311) 995-1003
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 41 Dahlöf B, Sever PS, Poulter NR, Wedel H, Beevers DG, Caulfield M et al. Prevention of cardiovascular events with an antihypertensive regimen of amlodipine adding peri-ndopril as required versus atenolol adding bendroflumethiazide as required, in the Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial-Blood Pressure Lowering Arm (ASCOT-BPLA): a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2005; 366 (9489) 895-906
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 42 Cruickshank JM. Are we misunderstanding beta-blockers. Int J Cardiol. 2007; 120: 10-27
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 43 Neutel JM, Smith DHG, Ram CV, Lefkowitz MP, Kazem-pour MK, Weber MW. Comparison of bisoprolol with atenolol for systemic hypertension in four population groups (young, old, black and nonblack) using ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. Am J Cardiol. 1993; 72: 41-6
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 44 Wiysonge CS, Bradley H, Mayosi BM, Maroney R, Mbewu A, Opie LH et al. Beta-blockers for hypertension. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007; 24: CD002003
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 45 Go AS, Yang J, Gurwitz JH, Hsu J, Lane K, Piatt R. Comparative effectiveness of different beta-adrenergic antagonists on mortality among adults with heart failure in clinical practice. Arch Intern Med. 2008; 168: 2415-21
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 46 Kirch W, Rose I, Demers HG, Leopold G, Pabst J, Ohnhaus EE. Pharmacokinetics of bisoprolol during repeated oral administration to healthy volunteers and patients with kidney or liver disease. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1987; 13: 110-7
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 47 McGavin JK, Keating GM. Bisoprolol: a review of its use in chronic heart failure. Drugs. 2002; 62 (18) 2677-96
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 48 Leopold G. Balanced pharmacokinetics and metabolism of bisoprolol. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1986; 8 (11) S16-20
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 49 Campeanu A. The cardiac insufficiency talinolol study (CITAS) study design. Eur J Heart Fail. 2001; 3: 377-80
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 50 Broncel M, Chojnowska-Jezierska J, Adamska-Dyniewska H. Bisoprolol in the treatment of hypertension in the elderly. J Hum Hypertens. 1998; 12: 643-4
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 51 Düngen HD, Apostolovic S, Inkrot S, Tahirovic E, Krackhardt F, Pavlovic M et al. Subproject Multicenter Trials in the Competence Network Heart Failure.Bisoprolol vs. carvedilol in elderly patients with heart failure: rationale and design of the CIBIS-ELD trial. Clin Res Cardiol. 2008; 97: 578-86
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar