Population Standards of Birth Weight Underestimate Fetal Growth Abnormalities in Diabetic Pregnancies

Abstract

The objective of this study was to compare the frequency of abnormal fetal growth in women with diabetes mellitus (DM) using population-based birth weight (pop BW) percentiles compared with customized birth weight (cust BW) percentiles, which include adjustments for maternal race, parity, height, weight, and fetal sex. The study design comprised a retrospective cohort of singleton DM pregnancies delivered over a 1-year period (June 2007 to May 2008) from a single tertiary care university-based medical center. Inclusion criteria were gestational age >20 weeks at delivery, live birth, and absence of major chromosomal/structural abnormalities. Small for gestational age (SGA), <10th percentile, and large for gestational age (LGA), >90th percentile pregnancies were categorized based on pop BW or cust BW standards. There were significant differences in the rates of SGA (p < 0.004) and LGA (p < 0.001) between cust BW and pop BW methods. When comparing the two methods, pop BW did not identify 13/16 (81%) of SGA and 23/39 (59%) of LGA babies defined by cust BW methods. The use of cust BW calculation in a diabetic population identified a greater percentage of neonates with pathologic fetal growth compared with pop BW standards, suggesting that the population standard may underdiagnose abnormal fetal growth in diabetic pregnancies.

Keywords

customized birth weight - diabetes - gestational diabetes - small for gestational age - large for gestational age

Note

Presented in part at the 58th Annual Meeting of the Society for Gynecologic Investigation, March 16–19, 2011, Miami, Florida.

The views expressed herein are those of the authors and are not to be construed as official or reflecting the views of the Department of the Army or the Department of Defense.

• References

• 1 Alexander GR, Himes JH, Kaufman RB, Mor J, Kogan M. A United States national reference for fetal growth. Obstet Gynecol 1996; 87 (2) 163-168
• 2 Gardosi J, Francis A. A customized standard to assess fetal growth in a US population. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009; 201 (1) 25-, e1–e7
• 3 Creasy RK, Resnik R, Iams JD . Creasy and Resnik’s Maternal-Fetal Medicine: Principles and Practice. 6th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders/Elsevier; 2009
• 4 Cheng YW, Chung JH, Kurbisch-Block I, Inturrisi M, Shafer S, Caughey AB. Gestational weight gain and gestational diabetes mellitus: perinatal outcomes. Obstet Gynecol 2008; 112 (5) 1015-1022
• 5 Silva IdosS, Higgins C, Swerdlow AJ , et al. Birthweight and other pregnancy outcomes in a cohort of women with pre-gestational insulin-treated diabetes mellitus, Scotland, 1979-95. Diabet Med 2005; 22 (4) 440-447
• 6 Gardosi J, Francis A. Adverse pregnancy outcome and association with small for gestational age birthweight by customized and population-based percentiles. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009; 201 (1) 28. e1-e8
• 7 de Jong CL, Gardosi J, Dekker GA, Colenbrander GJ, van Geijn HP. Application of a customised birthweight standard in the assessment of perinatal outcome in a high risk population. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1998; 105 (5) 531-535
• 8 Clausson B, Gardosi J, Francis A, Cnattingius S. Perinatal outcome in SGA births defined by customised versus population-based birthweight standards. BJOG 2001; 108 (8) 830-834
• 9 McCowan L, Stewart AW, Francis A, Gardosi J. A customised birthweight centile calculator developed for a New Zealand population. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2004; 44 (5) 428-431
• 10 Practice Bulletin ACOG ; American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Committee on Practice Bulletins--Obstetrics. ACOG Practice Bulletin. Clinical management guidelines for obstetrician-gynecologists. Number 30, September 2001 (replaces Technical Bulletin Number 200, December 1994). Gestational diabetes. Obstet Gynecol 2001; 98 (3) 525-538
• 11 Gardosi J. New definition of small for gestational age based on fetal growth potential. Horm Res 2006; 65 (Suppl (Suppl. 03) 15-18
• 12 Yang J, Cummings EA, O’connell C, Jangaard K. Fetal and neonatal outcomes of diabetic pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 108 (3 Pt 1) 644-650
• 13 Dunne F, Brydon P, Smith K, Gee H. Pregnancy in women with Type 2 diabetes: 12 years outcome data 1990-2002. Diabet Med 2003; 20 (9) 734-738
• 14 Athukorala C, Middleton P, Crowther CA. Intrapartum interventions for preventing shoulder dystocia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006; (4) CD005543
• 15 McCowan LM, Harding JE, Stewart AW. Customized birthweight centiles predict SGA pregnancies with perinatal morbidity. BJOG 2005; 112 (8) 1026-1033
• 16 Ego A, Subtil D, Grange G , et al. Customized versus population-based birth weight standards for identifying growth restricted infants: a French multicenter study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006; 194 (4) 1042-1049