Am J Perinatol 2012; 29(05): 339-346
DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1295643
Original Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Twenty-four-Hour Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitor Heart Rate: A Potential Marker for Gestational Hypertension in at-Risk Women

Corenthian J. Booker
1   Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina;
,
William C. Dodson
2   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Penn State University College of Medicine;
,
Allen R. Kunselman
3   Division of Biostatistics, Department of Public Health Sciences, Penn State College for Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania.
,
John T. Repke
2   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Penn State University College of Medicine;
,
Richard S. Legro
2   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Penn State University College of Medicine;
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

23 August 2011

23 August 2011

Publication Date:
06 December 2011 (online)

Abstract

We prospectively correlated the 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure measurements (ABPM) to conventional sphygmomanometer blood pressure measurements (CSM) in women at risk for gestational hypertensive disorders (GHTNDs) and identified predictive factors from ABPM for GHTND. We analyzed 73 women with ≥1 risk factor for developing a GHTND. Using both the CSM and ABPM, the systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, mean arterial pressure (MAP), and heart rate (HR) were measured for 24 hours during three periods (14 to 24 weeks; 24 to 32 weeks; and 33 weeks to delivery). Correlation between the CSM and ABPM lessened as pregnancy progressed. Seventeen (25%) of women developed a GHTND. MAP variability increased in the GHTND group versus those without a GHTND. The odds of developing a GHTND increased 1.5 times for every 1 beat per minute increase in the ABPM 24-hour HR at visit 1 and reversed by visit 3. In women at risk for a GHTND, CSM and ABPM correlate less well as pregnancy advances. HR changes in at-risk women may be a marker for the development of a GHTND and may reflect increased sympathetic activity and/or decreased baroreceptor sensitivity.

 
  • References

  • 1 Report of the National High Blood Pressure Education Program Working Group on High Blood Pressure in Pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000; 183: s1-s22
  • 2 Barton JR, Sibai BM. Prediction and prevention of recurrent preeclampsia. Obstet Gynecol 2008; 112 (2 Pt 1) 359-372
  • 3 Dolan E, Stanton A, Thijs L , et al. Superiority of ambulatory over clinic blood pressure measurement in predicting mortality: the Dublin outcome study. Hypertension 2005; 46: 156-161
  • 4 O’Brien E, Beevers G, Lip GY. ABC of hypertension. Blood pressure measurement. Part III-automated sphygmomanometry: ambulatory blood pressure measurement. BMJ 2001; 322: 1110-1114
  • 5 Feldman DM. Blood pressure monitoring during pregnancy. Blood Press Monit 2001; 6: 1-7
  • 6 Montan S, Choolani M, Arulkumaran S, Ratnam SS. Automated 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in preeclampsia. J Perinat Med 1995; 23: 353-358
  • 7 Hermida RC, Ayala DE, Iglesias M. Predictable blood pressure variability in healthy and complicated pregnancies. Hypertension 2001; 38 (3 Pt 2) 736-741
  • 8 Peek M, Shennan A, Halligan A, Lambert PC, Taylor DJ, De Swiet M. Hypertension in pregnancy: which method of blood pressure measurement is most predictive of outcome?. Obstet Gynecol 1996; 88: 1030-1033
  • 9 Biswas A, Choolani MA, Anandakumar C, Arulkumaran S. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in pregnancy induced hypertension. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1997; 76: 829-833
  • 10 Bergel E, Carroli G, Althabe F. Ambulatory versus conventional methods for monitoring blood pressure during pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2002; (2) CD001231
  • 11 Kyle PM, Clark SJ, Buckley D , et al. Second trimester ambulatory blood pressure in nulliparous pregnancy: a useful screening test for pre-eclampsia?. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1993; 100: 914-919
  • 12 Higgins JR, Walshe JJ, Halligan A, O’Brien E, Conroy R, Darling MR. Can 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure measurement predict the development of hypertension in primigravidae?. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1997; 104: 356-362
  • 13 Bellomo G, Narducci PL, Rondoni F , et al. Prognostic value of 24-hour blood pressure in pregnancy. JAMA 1999; 282: 1447-1452
  • 14 Benedetto C, Valensise H, Marozio L, Giarola M, Massobrio M, Romanini C. A two-stage screening test for pregnancy-induced hypertension and preeclampsia. Obstet Gynecol 1998; 92: 1005-1011
  • 15 Hermida RC, Ayala DE, Mojón A , et al. Blood pressure excess for the early identification of gestational hypertension and preeclampsia. Hypertension 1998; 31: 83-89
  • 16 Hermida RC, Ayala DE, Mojón A , et al. Differences in circadian blood pressure variability during gestation between healthy and complicated pregnancies. Am J Hypertens 2003; 16: 200-208
  • 17 Molino P, Veglio F, Genova GC , et al. Baroreflex control of heart rate is impaired in pre-eclampsia. J Hum Hypertens 1999; 13: 179-183
  • 18 Faber R, Baumert M, Stepan H, Wessel N, Voss A, Walther T. Baroreflex sensitivity, heart rate, and blood pressure variability in hypertensive pregnancy disorders. J Hum Hypertens 2004; 18: 707-712
  • 19 Helmreich RJ, Hundley V, Varvel P. The effect of obesity on heart rate (heart period) and physiologic parameters during pregnancy. Biol Res Nurs 2008; 10: 63-78
  • 20 Waugh J, Perry IJ, Halligan AW , et al. Birth weight and 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure in nonproteinuric hypertensive pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000; 183: 633-637
  • 21 Maggioni C, Cornélissen G, Otsuka K, Halberg F, Consonni D, Nicolini U. Circadian rhythm of maternal blood pressure and fetal growth. Biomed Pharmacother 2005; 59 (Suppl 01) S86-S91