Daily-Mean-SOFA, a New Derivative to Increase Accuracy of Mortality Prediction in Cardiac Surgical Intensive Care Units

Abstract

Background Sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score is widely used in many cardiac surgical intensive care units (ICUs). Its derivatives (mean and maximum values) are known to be more accurate than the original daily values of SOFA itself. However, they were designed for research purposes and could be calculated only after ICU discharge. We aimed to develop a reliable derivative that can be easily calculated daily (Daily-Mean-SOFA) for aiding daily-decision-making and resource allocation.

Methods All consecutive adult cardiac surgical patients from our ICU between January 1, 2007 and December 31, 2008 were included. We obtained Initial-SOFA (on day 1), the Original-Daily-SOFA value from the 1st to the 6th postoperative day, Max-SOFA (highest SOFA value during the whole ICU-stay), Mean-SOFA (sum of all daily SOFA values/the length of ICU-stay), and the new “Daily-Mean-SOFA” from day 2 to 6 (sum of SOFA from day 1 until day-n/n). We compared their accuracies at predicting ICU mortality using calibration and discrimination statistics.

Results Total 2801 patients were included. The newly developed “Daily-Mean-SOFA” was significantly more accurate than the corresponding SOFA value of the same day in correctly predicting survival and mortality in the whole study population (OCC: 94.1 to 95.0%) and in accurately identifying the individual patient’s risk of mortality (AUC: 0.859 to 0.904). It was better than all other derivatives except the Mean-SOFA which was superior to it (OCC: 96.3%; AUC: 0.913).

Conclusions The Daily-Mean-SOFA is a reliable derivative for daily risk stratification in cardiac ICUs. Due to its accuracy and daily availability, it may be used for risk-directed therapy in cardiac ICUs.

Keywords

outcomes (includes mortality morbidity) - intensive care - statistics

• References

• 1 Vincent JL, Moreno R, Takala J , et al. The SOFA (Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment) score to describe organ dysfunction/failure. On behalf of the Working Group on Sepsis-Related Problems of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Intensive Care Med 1996; 22 (7) 707-710
• 2 Vincent JL, Ferreira F, Moreno R. Scoring systems for assessing organ dysfunction and survival. Crit Care Clin 2000; 16 (2) 353-366
• 3 Ceriani R, Mazzoni M, Bortone F , et al. Application of the sequential organ failure assessment score to cardiac surgical patients. Chest 2003; 123 (4) 1229-1239
• 4 Moreno R, Vincent JL, Matos R , et al. The use of maximum SOFA score to quantify organ dysfunction/failure in intensive care. Results of a prospective, multicentre study. Working Group on Sepsis related Problems of the ESICM. Intensive Care Med 1999; 25 (7) 686-696
• 5 Ferreira FL, Bota DP, Bross A, Mélot C, Vincent JL. Serial evaluation of the SOFA score to predict outcome in critically ill patients. JAMA 2001; 286 (14) 1754-1758
• 6 Pätilä T, Kukkonen S, Vento A, Pettilä V, Suojaranta-Ylinen R. Relation of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score to morbidity and mortality after cardiac surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 2006; 82 (6) 2072-2078
• 7 DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL. Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics 1988; 44 (3) 837-845
• 8 Knaus WA, Draper EA, Wagner DP, Zimmerman JE. APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system. Crit Care Med 1985; 13 (10) 818-829
• 9 Marshall J, Nathens A . Clinical epidemiology and biostatistics for the intensive care physician. In: Sivak ED, ed. The High Risk Patient: Management of the Critically Ill. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1995 :1739–1752
• 10 Janssens U, Graf C, Graf J , et al. Evaluation of the SOFA score: a single-center experience of a medical intensive care unit in 303 consecutive patients with predominantly cardiovascular disorders. Sequential Organ Failure Assessment. Intensive Care Med 2000; 26 (8) 1037-1045
• 11 Predicting outcome in ICU patients. 2nd European Consensus Conference in Intensive Care Medicine. Intensive Care Med 1994; 20 (5) 390-397
• 12 Khwannimit B. Serial evaluation of the MODS, SOFA and LOD scores to predict ICU mortality in mixed critically ill patients. J Med Assoc Thai 2008; 91 (9) 1336-1342
• 13 Peres Bota D, Melot C, Lopes Ferreira F, Nguyen Ba V, Vincent JL. The Multiple Organ Dysfunction Score (MODS) versus the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score in outcome prediction. Intensive Care Med 2002; 28 (11) 1619-1624
• 14 Pettilä V, Pettilä M, Sarna S, Voutilainen P, Takkunen O. Comparison of multiple organ dysfunction scores in the prediction of hospital mortality in the critically ill. Crit Care Med 2002; 30 (8) 1705-1711
• 15 Zygun DA, Laupland KB, Fick GH, Sandham JD, Doig CJ. Limited ability of SOFA and MOD scores to discriminate outcome: a prospective evaluation in 1,436 patients. Can J Anaesth 2005; 52 (3) 302-308
• 16 Khwannimit B. A comparison of three organ dysfunction scores: MODS, SOFA and LOD for predicting ICU mortality in critically ill patients. J Med Assoc Thai 2007; 90 (6) 1074-1081
• 17 Sakr Y, Krauss C, Amaral AC , et al. Comparison of the performance of SAPS II, SAPS 3, APACHE II, and their customized prognostic models in a surgical intensive care unit. Br J Anaesth 2008; 101 (6) 798-803
• 18 Diamond GA. What price perfection? Calibration and discrimination of clinical prediction models. J Clin Epidemiol 1992; 45 (1) 85-89
• 19 Kramer AA, Zimmerman JE. Assessing the calibration of mortality benchmarks in critical care: The Hosmer-Lemeshow test revisited. Crit Care Med 2007; 35 (9) 2052-2056
• 20 Omar RZ, Ambler G, Royston P, Eliahoo J, Taylor KM. Cardiac surgery risk modeling for mortality: a review of current practice and suggestions for improvement. Ann Thorac Surg 2004; 77 (6) 2232-2237