Download PDF
J Reconstr Microsurg 2011; 27(8): 451-460
DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1281526
© Thieme Medical Publishers

Comparisons of Outcomes from Repair of Median Nerve and Ulnar Nerve Defect with Nerve Graft and Tubulization: A Meta-Analysis

Mei Yang1 , Jeremy L. Rawson1 , Elizabeth W. Zhang1 , Peter B. Arnold1 , William Lineaweaver2 , Feng Zhang1
  • 1Division of Plastic Surgery, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson
  • 2J.M. Still Burn and Reconstructive Center, Brandon, Mississippi
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
27 July 2011 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

ABSTRACT

In this study, an updated meta-analysis of all published human studies was presented to evaluate the recovery of the median and the ulnar nerves in the forearm after defect repair by nerve conduit and autologous nerve graft. Up to June of 2010, search for English language articles was conducted to collect publications on the outcome of median or ulnar nerve defect repair. A total of 33 studies and 1531 cases were included in this study. Patient information was extracted from these publications and the postoperative outcome was analyzed using meta-analysis. There was no significant difference in the postoperative recovery between the median and the ulnar nerves (odds ratio = 0.98). Sensory nerves were found to achieve a more satisfactory recovery after nerve defect repair than motor nerves (p < 0.05). Median nerve can also achieve more satisfactory recovery in both sensory and motor function than ulnar nerve (p < 0.05). There was no statistical difference between tubulization and autologous nerve graft in repairing defects less than 5 cm. Based on the results of this study, a median nerve with sensory impairment was associated with improved postoperative prognosis, while an ulnar nerve with motor nerve damage was prone to a worse prognosis. Tubulization can be a good alternative in the reconstruction of small defects.

KEYWORDS

Nerve repair - autologous graft - tubulization

REFERENCES

  • 1 Jaquet J B, Luijsterburg A J, Kalmijn S, Kuypers P D, Hofman A, Hovius S E. Median, ulnar, and combined median-ulnar nerve injuries: functional outcome and return to productivity.  J Trauma. 2001;  51 (4) 687-692
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Ichihara S, Inada Y, Nakamura T. Artificial nerve tubes and their application for repair of peripheral nerve injury: an update of current concepts.  Injury. 2008;  39 (Suppl 4) 29-39
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Schlosshauer B, Dreesmann L, Schaller H E, Sinis N. Synthetic nerve guide implants in humans: a comprehensive survey.  Neurosurgery. 2006;  59 (4) 740-747, discussion 747–748
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Hasegawa T, Nakamura S, Manabe T, Mikawa Y. Vascularized nerve grafts for the treatment of large nerve gap after severe trauma to an upper extremity.  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2004;  124 (3) 209-213
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Ruijs A C, Jaquet J B, Kalmijn S, Giele H, Hovius S E. Median and ulnar nerve injuries: a meta-analysis of predictors of motor and sensory recovery after modern microsurgical nerve repair.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;  116 (2) 484-494, discussion 495–496
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Merle M, Dellon A L, Campbell J N, Chang P S. Complications from silicon-polymer intubulation of nerves.  Microsurgery. 1989;  10 (2) 130-133
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Lundborg G, Dahlin L B, Danielsen N. Ulnar nerve repair by the silicone chamber technique. Case report.  Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 1991;  25 (1) 79-82
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Lundborg G, Rosén B, Abrahamson S O, Dahlin L, Danielsen N. Tubular repair of the median nerve in the human forearm. Preliminary findings.  J Hand Surg [Br]. 1994;  19 (3) 273-276
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Lundborg G, Rosén B, Dahlin L, Danielsen N, Holmberg J. Tubular versus conventional repair of median and ulnar nerves in the human forearm: early results from a prospective, randomized, clinical study.  J Hand Surg Am. 1997;  22 (1) 99-106
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Stanec S, Stanec Z. Ulnar nerve reconstruction with an expanded polytetrafluoroethylene conduit.  Br J Plast Surg. 1998;  51 (8) 637-639
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Stanec S, Stanec Z. Reconstruction of upper-extremity peripheral-nerve injuries with ePTFE conduits.  J Reconstr Microsurg. 1998;  14 (4) 227-232
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Braga-Silva J. The use of silicone tubing in the late repair of the median and ulnar nerves in the forearm.  J Hand Surg [Br]. 1999;  24 (6) 703-706
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Donoghoe N, Rosson G D, Dellon A L. Reconstruction of the human median nerve in the forearm with the Neurotube.  Microsurgery. 2007;  27 (7) 595-600
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Hung V, Dellon A L. Reconstruction of a 4-cm human median nerve gap by including an autogenous nerve slice in a bioabsorbable nerve conduit: case report.  J Hand Surg Am. 2008;  33 (3) 313-315
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Fan W, Gu J, Hu W et al.. Repairing a 35-mm-long median nerve defect with a chitosan/PGA artificial nerve graft in the human: a case study.  Microsurgery. 2008;  28 (4) 238-242
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Rosson G D, Williams E H, Dellon A L. Motor nerve regeneration across a conduit.  Microsurgery. 2009;  29 (2) 107-114
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Millesi H, Meissl G, Berger A. The interfascicular nerve-grafting of the median and ulnar nerves.  J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1972;  54 (4) 727-750
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Walton R, Finseth F. Nerve grafting in the repair of complicated peripheral nerve trauma.  J Trauma. 1977;  17 (10) 793-796
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Tallis R, Staniforth P, Fisher T R. Neurophysiological studies of autogenous sural nerve grafts.  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1978;  41 (8) 677-683
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Barrios C, Amillo S, de Pablos J, Cañadell J. Secondary repair of ulnar nerve injury. 44 cases followed for 2 years.  Acta Orthop Scand. 1990;  61 (1) 46-49
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Singh R, Mechelse K, Hop W C, Braakman R. Long-term results of transplantations to repair median, ulnar, and radial nerve lesions by a microsurgical interfascicular autogenous cable graft technique.  Surg Neurol. 1992;  37 (6) 425-431
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Vastamäki M, Kallio P K, Solonen K A. The results of secondary microsurgical repair of ulnar nerve injury.  J Hand Surg [Br]. 1993;  18 (3) 323-326
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Kallio P K, Vastamäki M. An analysis of the results of late reconstruction of 132 median nerves.  J Hand Surg [Br]. 1993;  18 (1) 97-105
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Kalomiri D E, Soucacos P N, Beris A E. Nerve grafting in peripheral nerve microsurgery of the upper extremity.  Microsurgery. 1994;  15 (7) 506-511
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Daoutis N K, Gerostathopoulos N E, Efstathopoulos D G, Misitizis D P, Bouchlis G N, Anagnostou S K. Microsurgical reconstruction of large nerve defects using autologous nerve grafts.  Microsurgery. 1994;  15 (7) 502-505
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Trumble T E, Kahn U, Vanderhooft E, Bach A W. A technique to quantitate motor recovery following nerve grafting.  J Hand Surg Am. 1995;  20 (3) 367-372
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Shen N, Zhu J. Functional assessment of peripheral nerve injury and repair.  J Reconstr Microsurg. 1996;  12 (3) 153-157
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Polatkan S, Orhun E, Polatkan O, Nuzumlali E, Bayri O. Evaluation of the improvement of sensibility after primary median nerve repair at the wrist.  Microsurgery. 1998;  18 (3) 192-196
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Kato H, Minami A, Kobayashi M, Takahara M, Ogino T. Functional results of low median and ulnar nerve repair with intraneural fascicular dissection and electrical fascicular orientation.  J Hand Surg Am. 1998;  23 (3) 471-482
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Amillo S, Mora G. Surgical management of neural injuries associated with elbow fractures in children.  J Pediatr Orthop. 1999;  19 (5) 573-577
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Kim D H, Kam A C, Chandika P, Tiel R L, Kline D G. Surgical management and outcomes in patients with median nerve lesions.  J Neurosurg. 2001;  95 (4) 584-594
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Kim D H, Han K, Tiel R L, Murovic J A, Kline D G. Surgical outcomes of 654 ulnar nerve lesions.  J Neurosurg. 2003;  98 (5) 993-1004
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Roganovic Z. Missile-caused ulnar nerve injuries: outcomes of 128 repairs.  Neurosurgery. 2004;  55 (5) 1120-1129
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Roganovic Z, Pavlicevic G. Difference in recovery potential of peripheral nerves after graft repairs.  Neurosurgery. 2006;  59 (3) 621-633, discussion 621–633
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Secer H I, Daneyemez M, Gonul E, Izci Y. Surgical repair of ulnar nerve lesions caused by gunshot and shrapnel: results in 407 lesions.  J Neurosurg. 2007;  107 (4) 776-783
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Terzis J K, Kokkalis Z T. Outcomes of secondary reconstruction of ulnar nerve lesions: our experience.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;  122 (4) 1100-1110
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Secer H I, Daneyemez M, Tehli O, Gonul E, Izci Y. The clinical, electrophysiologic, and surgical characteristics of peripheral nerve injuries caused by gunshot wounds in adults: a 40-year experience.  Surg Neurol. 2008;  69 (2) 143-152, discussion 152
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Murovic J A. Upper-extremity peripheral nerve injuries: a Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center literature review with comparison of the operative outcomes of 1837 Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center median, radial, and ulnar nerve lesions.  Neurosurgery. 2009;  65 (4, Suppl) A11-A17
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Mackinnon S, Dellon A L. Surgery of the Peripheral Nerve. New York: Thieme; 1988: 637
    Google Scholar
  • 40 Battiston B, Geuna S, Ferrero M, Tos P. Nerve repair by means of tubulization: literature review and personal clinical experience comparing biological and synthetic conduits for sensory nerve repair.  Microsurgery. 2005;  25 (4) 258-267
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Temple C. A primer in meta-analysis for the plastic surgeon.  Ann Plast Surg. 2010;  64 (4) 506-509
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Dahlin L B, Lundborg G. Use of tubes in peripheral nerve repair.  Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2001;  12 (2) 341-352
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Colen K L, Choi M, Chiu D T. Nerve grafts and conduits.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;  24 (6, Suppl) e386-e394
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Saur K, Bartos R, Sames M. Results of reinnervation after peripheral nerve repair by a microsurgical technique used in 1996-1998. [in Czech] Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech 2004;  71 (5) 297-302
    PubMed
  • 45 Taha A, Taha J. Results of suture of the radial, median, and ulnar nerves after missile injury below the axilla.  J Trauma. 1998;  45 (2) 335-339
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Kannan R Y, Salacinski H J, Butler P E, Seifalian A M. Artificial nerve conduits in peripheral-nerve repair.  Biotechnol Appl Biochem. 2005;  41 (Pt 3) 193-200
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Bushnell B D, McWilliams A D, Whitener G B, Messer T M. Early clinical experience with collagen nerve tubes in digital nerve repair.  J Hand Surg Am. 2008;  33 (7) 1081-1087
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Dahlin L B, Anagnostaki L, Lundborg G. Tissue response to silicone tubes used to repair human median and ulnar nerves.  Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 2001;  35 (1) 29-34
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Feng ZhangM.D. Ph.D. 

Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Mississippi Medical Center

2500 North State Street, Jackson, MS 39216

Email: fzhang@umc.edu

      >