ABSTRACT
The frequency and variety of spinal instrumentation has increased tremendously over
the past 100 years, and imaging plays an important role in evaluating the postoperative
spine. Although assessment of spinal hardware often involves a multimodality approach,
plain radiographs are the most commonly used modality, given accessibility, cost,
relatively low radiation dose compared with computed tomography, and provision of
positional information. An approach to assessment of plain radiographs of the postoperative
spine is discussed, and examples of common postoperative complications are provided,
including infection, hardware failure, incomplete fusion, and junctional failure.
KEYWORDS
Radiographs - spine surgery - complications - radiology
REFERENCES
1
Berquist T H.
Imaging of the postoperative spine.
Radiol Clin North Am.
2006;
44
(3)
407-418
2
Lonstein J E, Denis F, Perra J H, Pinto M R, Smith M D, Winter R B.
Complications associated with pedicle screws.
J Bone Joint Surg Am.
1999;
81
(11)
1519-1528
3
Slone R M, MacMillan M, Montgomery W J.
Spinal fixation. Part 3. Complications of spinal instrumentation.
Radiographics.
1993;
13
(4)
797-816
4
Slone R M, MacMillan M, Montgomery W J, Heare M.
Spinal fixation. Part 2. Fixation techniques and hardware for the thoracic and lumbosacral
spine.
Radiographics.
1993;
13
(3)
521-543
5
Foley M J, Calenoff L, Hendrix R W, Schafer M F.
Thoracic and lumbar spine fusion: postoperative radiologic evaluation.
AJR Am J Roentgenol.
1983;
141
(2)
373-380
6
Mettler Jr F A, Huda W, Yoshizumi T T, Mahesh M.
Effective doses in radiology and diagnostic nuclear medicine: a catalog.
Radiology.
2008;
248
(1)
254-263
7
Young P M, Berquist T H, Bancroft L W, Peterson J J.
Complications of spinal instrumentation.
Radiographics.
2007;
27
(3)
775-789
8
Heary R F, Kumar S, Bono C M.
Decision making in adult deformity.
Neurosurgery.
2008;
63
(3, Suppl)
69-77
9
Kuntz IV C, Shaffrey C I, Ondra S L et al..
Spinal deformity: a new classification derived from neutral upright spinal alignment
measurements in asymptomatic juvenile, adolescent, adult, and geriatric individuals.
Neurosurgery.
2008;
63
(3, Suppl)
25-39
10
Glassman S D, Berven S, Bridwell K, Horton W, Dimar J R.
Correlation of radiographic parameters and clinical symptoms in adult scoliosis.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976).
2005;
30
(6)
682-688
11
Bernhardt M, Bridwell K H.
Segmental analysis of the sagittal plane alignment of the normal thoracic and lumbar
spines and thoracolumbar junction.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976).
1989;
14
(7)
717-721
12
Kim P E, Zee C S.
Imaging of the postoperative spine: cages, prostheses, and instrumentation.
Spinal Imaging Med Radiol.
2007;
6
397-413
13
Fan Y F, Chong V F, Tan S K.
Failed back surgery syndrome: differentiating epidural fibrosis and recurrent disc
prolapse with Gd-DTPA enhanced MRI.
Singapore Med J.
1995;
36
(2)
153-156
14
Long D M.
Failed back surgery syndrome.
Neurosurg Clin N Am.
1991;
2
(4)
899-919
15
Richards B S.
Delayed infections following posterior spinal instrumentation for the treatment of
idiopathic scoliosis.
J Bone Joint Surg Am.
1995;
77
(4)
524-529
16
Olsen M A, Nepple J J, Riew K D et al..
Risk factors for surgical site infection following orthopaedic spinal operations.
J Bone Joint Surg Am.
2008;
90
(1)
62-69
17
Fang A, Hu S S, Endres N, Bradford D S.
Risk factors for infection after spinal surgery.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976).
2005;
30
(12)
1460-1465
18
Bose B.
Delayed infection after instrumented spine surgery: case reports and review of the
literature.
Spine J.
2003;
3
(5)
394-399
19
Guidera K J, Hooten J, Weatherly W et al..
Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation. Results in 52 patients.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976).
1993;
18
(4)
427-431
20 Heller J G, Whitecloud T S, Butler J C et al.. Complications of spinal surgery.
In: Rothman R R, Simeone F A, eds. The Spine. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders;
1992: 1817-1898
21
Rutherford E E, Tarplett L J, Davies E M, Harley J M, King L J.
Lumbar spine fusion and stabilization: hardware, techniques, and imaging appearances.
Radiographics.
2007;
27
(6)
1737-1749
22
Tehranzadeh J, Ton J D, Rosen C D.
Advances in spinal fusion.
Semin Ultrasound CT MR.
2005;
26
(2)
103-113
23
Cahill K S, Chi J H, Day A, Claus E B.
Prevalence, complications, and hospital charges associated with use of bone-morphogenetic
proteins in spinal fusion procedures.
JAMA.
2009;
302
(1)
58-66
24
Licina P.
Early complications associated with BMP in lumbar interbody fusions.
J Bone Joint Surg Br.
2009;
91-B
437-439
25
McClellan J W, Mulconrey D S, Forbes R J, Fullmer N.
Vertebral bone resorption after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with bone morphogenetic
protein (rhBMP-2).
J Spinal Disord Tech.
2006;
19
(7)
483-486
26
Yazici M, Asher M A, Hardacker J W.
The safety and efficacy of Isola-Galveston instrumentation and arthrodesis in the
treatment of neuromuscular spinal deformities.
J Bone Joint Surg Am.
2000;
82
(4, 82-A)
524-543
27
Suda K, Ito M, Abumi K, Haba H, Taneichi H, Kaneda K.
Radiological risk factors of pseudoarthrosis and/or instrument breakage after PLF
with the pedicle screw system in isthmic spondylolisthesis.
J Spinal Disord Tech.
2006;
19
(8)
541-546
28
Emami A, Deviren V, Berven S, Smith J A, Hu S S, Bradford D S.
Outcome and complications of long fusions to the sacrum in adult spine deformity:
Luque-Galveston, combined iliac and sacral screws, and sacral fixation.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976).
2002;
27
(7)
776-786
28a
Ray C D.
Threaded fusion cages for lumbar interbody fusions: an economic comparison with 360
degrees fusions.
Spine.
1997;
22
681-685
29
Cho K J, Suk S I, Park S R et al..
Complications in posterior fusion and instrumentation for degenerative lumbar scoliosis.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976).
2007;
32
(20)
2232-2237
30
Etebar S, Cahill D W.
Risk factors for adjacent-segment failure following lumbar fixation with rigid instrumentation
for degenerative instability.
J Neurosurg.
1999;
90
(2, Suppl)
163-169
31
Schlegel J D, Smith J A, Schleusener R L.
Lumbar motion segment pathology adjacent to thoracolumbar, lumbar, and lumbosacral
fusions.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976).
1996;
21
(8)
970-981
32
Lee C K, Langrana N A.
Lumbosacral spinal fusion. A biomechanical study.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976).
1984;
9
(6)
574-581
33
Yang S W, Langrana N A, Lee C K.
Biomechanics of lumbosacral spinal fusion in combined compression-torsion loads.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976).
1986;
11
(9)
937-941
34
Froning E C, Frohman B.
Motion of the lumbosacral spine after laminectomy and spine fusion. Correlation of
motion with the result.
J Bone Joint Surg Am.
1968;
50
(5)
897-918
35
Ha K Y, Schendel M J, Lewis J L, Ogilvie J W.
Effect of immobilization and configuration on lumbar adjacent-segment biomechanics.
J Spinal Disord.
1993;
6
(2)
99-105
36
Carpenter C T, Dietz J W, Leung K Y, Hanscom D A, Wagner T A.
Repair of a pseudarthrosis of the lumbar spine. A functional outcome study.
J Bone Joint Surg Am.
1996;
78
(5)
712-720
Alexandra Talia VertinskyM.D.
Division of Neuroradiology, Vancouver General Hospital
855 West 12th Ave., Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9 Canada
Email: tvertinsky@gmail.com