Endoscopy 2011; 43(10): 839-843
DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1271112
Original article
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Clinical advantage of endoscopic submucosal dissection over endoscopic mucosal resection for early mesopharyngeal and hypopharyngeal cancers

T. Iizuka
1   Department of Gastroenterology, Toranomon Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
,
D. Kikuchi
1   Department of Gastroenterology, Toranomon Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
,
S. Hoteya
1   Department of Gastroenterology, Toranomon Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
,
M. Nakamura
1   Department of Gastroenterology, Toranomon Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
,
S. Yamashita
1   Department of Gastroenterology, Toranomon Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
,
T. Mitani
1   Department of Gastroenterology, Toranomon Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
,
H. Takeda
2   Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Toranomon Hospital, Japan, Tokyo, Japan
,
N. Yahagi
3   Oncology Center, Keio University, Tokyo, Japan
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

submitted 14 July 2010

accepted after revision 18 May 2011

Publication Date:
10 August 2011 (online)

Background and study aims: In previous series, endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) has been used for the treatment of early-stage mesopharyngeal and hypopharyngeal cancers to preserve patients’ quality of life. Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) offers potential advantages in comparison to EMR. So the aim of this retrospective study was to assess the utility of ESD compared with EMR for early-stage cancers of the meso- and hypopharynx.

Patients and methods: We studied 56 patients with 69 lesions who underwent either EMR or ESD between April 2001 and December 2008. EMR was performed until January 2007, and ESD was performed from February 2007 onward. We evaluated the en bloc resection rate, R0 resection rate, and treatment-related complications as short-term outcomes. Local recurrence, lymph node metastasis, and disease-related deaths were compared to evaluate long-term outcomes.

Results: The en bloc and R0 resection rates were respectively 98 % and 79 % in the ESD group and 37 % and 26 % in the EMR group. There were no cases of treatment-related complications in the EMR group, but postoperative subcutaneous emphysema was observed in two patients in the ESD group. In the EMR group, one patient developed a local recurrence and one developed metastasis to the cervical lymph node and died of primary cancer.

Conclusions: ESD is a useful method of treatment for early mesopharyngeal and hypopharyngeal cancers and may be superior to EMR.

 
  • References

  • 1 Suzuki H, Saito Y, Oda I et al Feasibility of endoscopic mucosal resection for superficial pharyngeal cancer: a minimally invasive treatment. Endoscopy 2010; 42: 1-7
  • 2 Ohkuwa M, Hosokawa K, Boku N et al New endoscopic treatment for intramucosal gastric tumors using an insulated-tip diathermic knife. Endoscopy 2001; 33: 221-226
  • 3 Miyamoto S, Muto M, Hamamoto Y et al A new technique for endoscopic mucosal resection with an insulated-tip electrosurgical knife improves the completeness of resection of intramucosal gastric neoplasms. Gastrointest Endosc 2002; 55: 576-581
  • 4 Yamamoto H, Kawata H, Sunada K et al Success rate of curative endoscopic mucosal resection with circumferential mucosal incision assisted by submucosal injection of sodium hyaluronate. Gastrointest Endosc 2002; 56: 507-512
  • 5 Oyama T, Tomori A, Hotta K et al Endoscopic submucosal dissection of early esophageal cancer. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2005; 3: S67-70
  • 6 Ono S, Fujishiro M, Niimi K et al Long–term outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial esophageal squamous cell neoplasms. Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 70: 860-866
  • 7 Tamegai Y, Saito Y, Masaki N et al Endoscopic submucosal dissection: a safe technique for colorectal tumors. Endoscopy 2007; 39: 418-422
  • 8 Iizuka T, Kikuchi D, Hoteya S et al Endoscopic submucosal dissection for treatment of mesopharyngeal and hypopharyngeal carcinomas. Endoscopy 2009; 41: 113-117
  • 9 Oka S, Tanaka S, Kaneko I et al Advantage of endoscopic submucosal dissection compared with EMR for early gastric cancer. Gastrointest Endosc 2006; 64: 877-883
  • 10 Ishihara R, Iishi H, Uedo N et al Comparison of EMR and endoscopic submucosal dissection for en bloc resection of early esophageal cancers in Japan. Gastrointest Endosc 2008; 68: 1066-1072
  • 11 Japanese Society for Esophageal Disease. Guidelines for clinical and pathological studies on carcinoma of the esophagus. , 10th ed [in Japanese]. Tokyo: Kanehara Shuppan; 2007
  • 12 Schlemper RJ, Kato Y, Stolte M. Diagnostic criteria for gastrointestinal carcinomas in Japan and Western countries: proposal for a new classification system of gastrointestinal epithelial neoplasia. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2000; 15: G49-G57
  • 13 Esaki M, Matsumoto T, Hirakawa K et al Risk factors for local recurrence of superficial esophageal cancer after treatment by endoscopic mucosal resection. Endoscopy 2007; 39: 41-45
  • 14 Ishihara R, Iishi H, Takeuchi Y et al Local recurrence of large squamous-cell carcinoma of the esophagus after endoscopic resection. Gastrointest Endosc 2008; 67: 799-804
  • 15 Shimizu Y, Yoshida T, Kato M et al Long-term outcome after endoscopic resection in patients with hypopharyngeal carcinoma invading the subepithelium: a case series. Endoscopy 2009; 41: 374-376