Endoscopy 2011; 43(11): 955-961
DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1271110
Original article
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Granulomatous mediastinal adenopathy: can endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration differentiate between tuberculosis and sarcoidosis?

A. Fritscher-Ravens
1   Homerton University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London UK
2   St Mary’s Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
3   Interdisciplinary Endoscopy, Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Germany
,
A. Ghanbari
1   Homerton University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London UK
,
T. Topalidis
4   Cytologic Institute, Hannover, Germany
,
M. Pelling
2   St Mary’s Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
,
O. M. Kon
2   St Mary’s Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
,
K. Patel
1   Homerton University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London UK
,
A. Arlt
3   Interdisciplinary Endoscopy, Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Germany
,
A. Bhowmik
1   Homerton University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London UK
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

submitted 18 September 2010

accepted after revision 25 May 2011

Publication Date:
10 August 2011 (online)

Background and study aims: Mediastinal lymphadenopathy may indicate diseases such as tuberculosis or sarcoidosis, and it is often difficult to establish a diagnosis when standard medical work-up is inconclusive. In this study we investigated the diagnostic yield of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS – FNA) in the differentiation between tuberculosis and sarcoidosis.

Patients and methods: In this prospective study, 72 consecutive patients with mediastinal lymphadenopathy, negative endoscopic investigations including bronchoscopic procedures, and no radiological evidence of lung cancer or other malignancies on computed tomography were enrolled. EUS – FNA and subsequent cytology, microscopy for acid-fast bacilli, and culture were performed. At least 12 months’ follow-up including further investigations was included to exclude tuberculosis.

Results: Adequate samples were obtained from 71/72 patients (36 male; mean age 50.2 years). No complications occurred. The final diagnosis included 30 cases of sarcoidosis, 28 of tuberculosis, four malignancies, one abscess, and nine benign lymphadenopathies. The size of lymph nodes on EUS varied from 0.5 cm to 4.2 cm. Tuberculosis nodes were significantly smaller than those in sarcoidosis. Unrelated nodes were significantly smaller than in either tuberculosis or sarcoidosis. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of EUS – FNA for tuberculosis were 86 %, 100 %, 100 %, and 91 %, respectively; those for sarcoidosis were 100 %, 93 %, 91 %, and 100 %, respectively. For culture of tuberculosis, they were 71 %, 100 %, 100 %, and 84 %, respectively. EUS – FNA led to a definite diagnosis in 64/72 cases (89 %) that had not been previously diagnosed by routine methods.

Conclusion: EUS – FNA offers a high diagnostic yield for the differential diagnosis of tuberculosis and sarcoidosis that have not been diagnosed by conventional methods.

 
  • References

  • 1 Raviglione MC, Snider Jr DE, Kochi A. Global epidemiology of tuberculosis. Morbidity and mortality of a worldwide epidemic. JAMA 1995; 273: 220-226
  • 2 Chan ED, Iseman MD. Current medical treatment for tuberculosis. BMJ 2002; 325: 1282-1286
  • 3 Joint Tuberculosis Committee of the British Thoracic Society. prevention of tuberculosis in the United Kingdom: code of practice 2000. Control and Thorax 2000; 55: 887-901
  • 4 Maher D, Dye C, Floyd K et al Planning to improve global health: the next decade of tuberculosis control. Bull World Health Organ 2007; 85: 341-347
  • 5 Ormerod LP, Prescott RJ. The management of pulmonary and lymph node tuberculosis notified in England and Wales in 1998. Clin Med 2003; 3: 57-61
  • 6 French CE, Kruijshaar ME, Jones JA, Abubakar I. The influence of socio-economic deprivation on tuberculosis treatment delays in England, 2000-2005. Epidemiol Infect 2009; 137: 591-596
  • 7 Baughman RP, Lower EE, du Bois RM. Sarcoidosis. Lancet 2003; 361: 1111-1118
  • 8 Statement on sarcoidosis. Joint Statement of the American Thoracic Society (ATS), the European Respiratory Society (ERS) and the World Association of Sarcoidosis and Other Granulomatous Disorders (WASOG) adopted by the ATS Board of Directors and by the ERS Executive Committee, February 1999. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1999; 160: 736-755
  • 9 Trisolini R, Lazzari Agli L, Cancellieri A et al The value of flexible transbronchial needle aspiration in the diagnosis of stage I sarcoidosis. Chest 2003; 124: 2126-2130
  • 10 Bilaceroglu S, Gunel O, Eris N et al Transbronchial needle aspiration in diagnosing intrathoracic tuberculous lymphadenitis. Chest 2004; 126: 259-267
  • 11 Fritscher-Ravens A, Sriram PV, Bobrowski C et al Mediastinal lymphadenopathy in patients with or without previous malignancy: EUS-FNA-based differential cytodiagnosis in 153 patients. Am J Gastroenterol 2000; 95: 2278-2284
  • 12 Vilmann P, Puri R. The complete “medical” mediastinoscopy (EUS-FNA + EBUS-TBNA). Minerva Med 2007; 98: 331-338
  • 13 Vilmann P, Annema J, Clementsen P. Endosonography in bronchopulmonary disease. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2009; 23: 711-728
  • 14 Micames CG, McCrory DC, Pavey DA et al Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for non-small cell lung cancer staging: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Chest 2007; 131: 539-548
  • 15 Fritscher-Ravens A, Sriram PV, Topalidis T et al Diagnosing sarcoidosis using endosonography-guided fine-needle aspiration. Chest 2000; 118: 928-935
  • 16 Annema JT, Veselic M, Rabe KF. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for the diagnosis of sarcoidosis. Eur Respir J 2005; 25: 405-409
  • 17 Wildi SM, Judson MA, Fraig M et al Is endosonography guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) for sarcoidosis as good as we think?. Thorax 2004; 59: 794-799
  • 18 Iwashita T, Yasuda I, Doi S et al The yield of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration for histological diagnosis in patients suspected of stage I sarcoidosis. Endoscopy 2008; 40: 400-405
  • 19 von Bartheld MB, Veselic-Charvat M, Rabe KF, Annema JT. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for the diagnosis of sarcoidosis. Endoscopy 2010; 42: 213-217
  • 20 Khoo KL, Ho KY, Nilsson B, Lim TK. EUS-guided FNA immediately after unrevealing transbronchial needle aspiration in the evaluation of mediastinal lymphadenopathy: a prospective study. Gastrointest Endosc 2006; 63: 215-220
  • 21 Khoo KL, Ho KY, Khor CJ et al First endoscopic procedure for diagnosis and staging of mediastinal lymphadenopathy. World J Gastroenterol 2009; 15: 6096-6101
  • 22 Koo V, Lioe TF, Spence RA. Fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) in the diagnosis of granulomatous lymphadenitis. Ulster Med J 2006; 75: 59-64
  • 23 Fritscher-Ravens A, Soehendra N, Schirrow L et al Role of transesophageal endosonography-guided fine-needle aspiration in the diagnosis of lung cancer. Chest 2000; 117: 339-345
  • 24 Dupont WD, Plummer Jr WD. Power and sample size calculations for studies involving linear regression. Control Clin Trials 1998; 19: 589-601
  • 25 Dupont WD, Plummer Jr WD. Power and sample size calculations. A review and computer program. Control Clin Trials 1990; 11: 116-128
  • 26 Porte H, Roumilhac D, Eraldi L et al The role of mediastinoscopy in the diagnosis of mediastinal lymphadenopathy. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1998; 13: 196-199
  • 27 Julious SA. Two-sided confidence intervals for the single proportion: comparison of seven methods by Robert G. Newcombe, Statistics in Medicine 1998; 17: 857-872 . Stat Med 2005; 24: 3383-3384
  • 28 Newcombe RG. Two-sided confidence intervals for the single proportion: comparison of seven methods. Stat Med 1998; 17: 857-872
  • 29 Wiselka M. 2006: a year for cautious optimism in tuberculosis. J Infect 2006; 53: 1-4
  • 30 Hong Kong Chest Service/Tuberculosis Research Centre, Madras/British Medical Research Council. A controlled trial of 2-month, 3-month, and 12-month regimens of chemotherapy for sputum-smear-negative pulmonary tuberculosis. Results at 60 months. Am Rev Respir Dis 1984; 130: 23-28
  • 31 Berger LP, Scheffer RC, Weusten BL et al The additional value of EUS-guided Tru-cut biopsy to EUS-guided FNA in patients with mediastinal lesions. Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 69: 1045-1051
  • 32 Storch I, Shah M, Thurer R et al Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration and Trucut biopsy in thoracic lesions: when tissue is the issue. Surg Endosc 2008; 22: 86-90
  • 33 Saftoiu A, Vilmann P, Guldhammer Skov B, Georgescu CV. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided Trucut biopsy adds significant information to EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration in selected patients: a prospective study. Scand J Gastroenterol 2007; 42: 117-125
  • 34 Song HJ, Park YS, Seo DW et al Diagnosis of mediastinal tuberculosis by using EUS-guided needle sampling in a geographic region with an intermediate tuberculosis burden. Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 71: 1307-1313
  • 35 Armstrong JR, Radke JR, Kvale PA et al Endoscopic findings in sarcoidosis. Characteristics and correlations with radiographic staging and bronchial mucosal biopsy yield. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1981; 90: 339-343
  • 36 Sriram PVJ, Kaffes AJ, Rajasekhar P et al EUS features of mediastinal tuberculosis: a PCR based cytodiagnosis by trans-esophageal EUS-FNA. Gastrointest Endosc 2004; 59: 216
  • 37 Costabel U, Hunninghake GW. ATS/ERS/WASOG statement on sarcoidosis. Sarcoidosis Statement Committee. American Thoracic Society. European Respiratory Society. World Association for Sarcoidosis and Other Granulomatous Disorders. Eur Respir J 1999; 14: 735-737
  • 38 Puri R, Vilmann P, Sud R et al Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology in the evaluation of suspected tuberculosis in patients with isolated mediastinal lymphadenopathy. Endoscopy 2010; 42: 462-467