Download PDF
Kardiologie up2date 2011; 7(4): 319-335
DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1257108
Koronare Herzerkrankung und Atherosklerose
 
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Aktueller Status der katheterinterventionellen Behandlung der koronaren Herzerkrankung

Felix  Vogt, Nikolaus  Marx
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
02 February 2012 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints All articles of this category

Abstract

Here, we describe current interventional techniques for the treatment of coronary artery disease focusing on recent drug-eluting stent (DES) developments. The introduction of DES in the beginning of the century revolutionized interventional cardiology by a dramatic improvement of in-stent restenosis (ISR) rates. However, in higher risk coronary lesions, clinical outcome is still severely crisscrossed by elevated ISR and often fatal stent thrombosis. Therefore, anew paradigm shifts are on the horizon with promising novel developments, e. g. biodegradable stents.

Literatur

  • 1 Mueller R L, Sanborn T A. The history of interventional cardiology: cardiac catheterization, angioplasty, and related interventions.  Am Heart J. 1995;  129 146-172 DOI: 10.1016/0002-8703(95)90055-1
    Google Scholar
  • 2 Schlumpf M. 30 Jahre Ballonkatheter: Andreas Grüntzig, ein Pionier in Zürich.  Schweizerische Ärztezeitung. 2004;  85 3460
    Google Scholar
  • 3 Simsek C, Serruys P W. Developments in coronary artery stenting: primum non nocere.  Panminerva Med. 2011;  53 19-30
    Google Scholar
  • 4 Fischman D L, Leon M B, Baim D S et al., for the Stent Restenosis Study Investigators. A Randomized Comparison of Coronary-Stent Placement and Balloon Angioplasty in the Treatment of Coronary Artery Disease.  N Engl J Med. 1994;  331 496-501
    Google Scholar
  • 5 Cutlip D E, Chauhan M S, Baim D S et al. Clinical restenosis after coronary stenting: perspectives from multicenter clinical trials.  J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;  40 2082
    Google Scholar
  • 6 Roukoz H, Bavry A A, Sarkees M L et al. Comprehensive meta-analysis on drug-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents during extended follow-up.  Am J Med. 2009;  122 581 e1 – e10
    Google Scholar
  • 7 Costa M A, Simon D I. Molecular basis of restenosis and drug-eluting stents.  Circulation. 2005;  111 2257-2273
    Google Scholar
  • 8 Morice M C, Serruys P W, Sousa J E et al., RAVEL Study Group. A randomized comparison of a sirolimus-eluting stent with a standard stent for coronary revascularization.  N Engl J Med. 2002;  346 1773-1780
    Google Scholar
  • 9 Stone G W, Ellis S G, Cox D A et al. A polymer-based, paclitaxel-eluting stent in patients with coronary artery disease.  N Engl J Med. 2004;  350 221
    Google Scholar
  • 10 Serruys P W et al. RESOLUTE All Comers Trial. Comparison of zotarolimus-eluting and everolimus-eluting coronary stents.  N Engl J Med. 2010;  363 136-146
    Google Scholar
  • 11 Scheller B, Hehrlein C, Bocksch W et al. Treatment of coronary in-stent restenosis with a paclitaxel-coated balloon catheter.  N Engl J Med. 2006;  355 2113
    Google Scholar
  • 12 Unverdorben M, Vallbracht C, Cremers B et al. Paclitaxel-coated balloon catheter versus paclitaxel-coated stent for the treatment of coronary in-stent restenosis.  Circulation. 2009;  119 2986
    Google Scholar
  • 13 Garg S et al. The twelve-month outcomes of a biolimus eluting stent with a biodegradable polymer compared with a sirolimus eluting stent with a durable polymer.  EuroIntervention. 2010;  6 233-239
    Google Scholar
  • 14 Grube E, Schofer J, Hauptmann K E et al. A novel paclitaxel-eluting stent with an ultrathin abluminal biodegradable polymer 9-month outcomes with the JACTAX HD stent.  JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2010;  4 431-438
    Google Scholar
  • 15 Guagliumi G, Sirbu V, Musumeci G et al. Strut coverage and vessel wall response to a new-generation paclitaxel-eluting stent with an ultrathin biodegradable abluminal polymer: Optical Coherence Tomography Drug-Eluting Stent Investigation (OCTDESI).  Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2010;  4 367-375 [Epub 2010 Jul 20]
    Google Scholar
  • 16 Byrne R A, Kastrati A, Massberg S et al., ISAR-TEST 4 Investigators. Biodegradable polymer versus permanent polymer drug-eluting stents and everolimus- versus sirolimus-eluting stents in patients with coronary artery disease 3-year outcomes from a randomized clinical trial.  J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;  58 1325-1331
    Google Scholar
  • 17 Massberg S, Byrne R A, Kastrati A et al., ISAR-TEST 4 Investigators. Polymer-free sirolimus- and probucol-eluting versus new generation zotarolimus-eluting stents in coronary artery disease: the Intracoronary Stenting and Angiographic Results: (ISAR-TEST 5) trial.  Circulation. 2011;  124 624-632 [Epub 2011 Jul 18]
    Google Scholar
  • 18 Virmani R et al. Localized hypersensitivity and late coronary thrombosis secondary to a sirolimus-eluting stent: Should we be cautious?.  Circulation. 2004;  109 701-705
    Google Scholar
  • 19 Liu H T, Li F, Wang W Y et al. Rapamycin inhibits re-endothelialization after percutaneous coronary intervention by impeding the proliferation and migration of endothelial cells and inducing apoptosis of endothelial progenitor cells.  Tex Heart Inst J. 2010;  37 194-201
    Google Scholar
  • 20 Yusuf R Z, Duan Z, Lamendola D E et al. Paclitaxel resistance: molecular mechanisms and pharmacologic manipulation.  Curr Cancer Drug Targets. 2003;  3 1-19
    Google Scholar
  • 21 Huang S, Houghton P J. Mechanisms of resistance to rapamycins.  Drug Resist Updat. 2001;  4 378-391
    Google Scholar
  • 22 Farb A, John M, Acampado E et al. Oral Everolimus Inhibits In-Stent Neointimal Growth.  Circulation. 2002;  106 2379-2384 DOI: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000033973.06059.04
    Google Scholar
  • 23 Suzuki T, Kopia G, Hayashi S et al. Stent-Based Delivery of Sirolimus Reduces Neointimal Formation in a Porcine Coronary Model.  Circulation. 2001;  104 1188-1193 DOI: 10.1161/hc3601.093987
    Google Scholar
  • 24 Pfisterer M et al. Late clinical events after clopidogrel discontinuation may limit the benefit of drug-eluting stents: an observational study of drug-eluting versus baremetal stents.  J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;  48 2584-2591
    Google Scholar
  • 25 Lüscher T F, Steffel J, Eberli F R et al. Drug-Eluting Stent and Coronary Thrombosis: Biological Mechanisms and Clinical Implications.  Circulation. 2007;  115 1051-1058
    Google Scholar
  • 26 Moses J W, Leon M B, Popma J J et al. Sirolimus-eluting stents versus standard stents in patients with stenosis in a native coronary artery.  N Engl J Med. 2003;  349 1315-1323
    Google Scholar
  • 27 Stone G W, Ellis S G, Cox D A et al. One-year clinical results with the slow-release, polymer-based, paclitaxel-eluting TAXUS stent: the TAXUS-IV trial.  Circulation. 2004;  109 1942-1947
    Google Scholar
  • 28 Roiron C, Sanchez P, Bouzamondo A et al. Drug eluting stents: an updated meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.  Heart. 2006;  92 6416
    Google Scholar
  • 29 Stettler C, Wandel S, Allemann S et al. Outcomes associated with drug-eluting and bare-metal stents: a collaborative network meta-analysis.  Lancet. 2007;  370 937
    Google Scholar
  • 30 Stone G W, Midei M, Newman W et al. SPIRIT III Investigators. Randomized comparison of everolimus-eluting and paclitaxel-eluting stents: two-year clinical follow-up from the Clinical Evaluation of the Xience V Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System in the Treatment of Patients with de novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions (SPIRIT) III trial.  Circulation. 2009;  119 680-686 [Epub 2009 Jan 26]
    Google Scholar
  • 31 Smits P C, Kedhi E, Royaards K J et al. 2-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial of everolimus- and paclitaxel-eluting stents for coronary revascularization in daily practice. COMPARE (Comparison of the everolimus eluting XIENCE-V stent with the paclitaxel eluting TAXUS LIBERTÉ stent in all-comers: a randomized open label trial).  J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;  58 11-18 [Epub 2011 Apr 21]
    Google Scholar
  • 32 Byrne R A, Kastrati A, Massberg S et al., ISAR-TEST 4 Investigators. Biodegradable polymer versus permanent polymer drug-eluting stents and everolimus- versus sirolimus-eluting stents in patients with coronary artery disease: 3-year outcomes from a randomized clinical trial.  J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;  58 1325-1331
    Google Scholar
  • 33 Kim W J, Lee S W, Park S W et al., ESSENCE-DIABETES Study Investigators.. Randomized comparison of everolimus-eluting stent versus sirolimus-eluting stent implantation for de novo coronary artery disease in patients with diabetes mellitus (ESSENCE-DIABETES): results from the ESSENCE-DIABETES trial.  Circulation. 2011;  124 886-892 [Epub 2011 Aug 1]
    Google Scholar
  • 34 Raber L, Wohlwend L, Wigger M et al. Five-Year Clinical and Angiographic Outcomes of a Randomized Comparison of Sirolimus-Eluting and Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents: Results of the Sirolimus-Eluting Versus Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents for Coronary Revascularization LATE Trial.  Circulation. 2011;  123 2819-2828
    Google Scholar
  • 35 Garg P et al. Drug-eluting or bare-metal stenting in patients with diabetes mellitus: results from the Massachusetts Data Analysis Center Registry.  Circulation. 2008;  118 2277-2285
    Google Scholar
  • 36 Liistro F et al. Long-term effectiveness and safety of sirolimus stent implantation for coronary in-stent restenosis results of the TRUE (Tuscany Registry of sirolimus for unselected in-stent restenosis) registry at 4 yrs.  J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;  55 613-616
    Google Scholar
  • 37 Elezi S et al. Vessel size and outcome after coronary drug-eluting stent placement: results from a large cohort of patients treated with sirolimus- or paclitaxel-eluting stents.  J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;  48 1304-1309
    Google Scholar
  • 38 Godino C et al. Clinical and angiographic follow-up of small vessel lesions treated with paclitaxel-eluting stents (from the TRUE Registry).  Am J Cardiol. 2008;  102 1002-1008
    Google Scholar
  • 39 Pfisterer M et al. Long-term benefit-risk balance of drug-eluting vs. Bare-metal stents in daily practice: Does stent diameter matter? Three-year follow-up of BASKET.  Eur Heart J. 2009;  30 16-24
    Google Scholar
  • 40 Sheiban I, Infantino V A, Colombo F et al. Very long-term results comparing a simple versus a complex stenting strategy in the treatment of coronary bifurcation lesions.  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2009;  74 313-320
    Google Scholar
  • 41 Korn H V, Yu J, Ohlow M A et al. Interventional therapy of bifurcation lesions: a TIMI flow-guided concept to treat side branches in bifurcation lesions – a prospective randomized clinical study (Thueringer bifurcation study, THUEBIS study as pilot trial).  Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2009;  2 535-542 [Epub 2009 Nov 10]
    Google Scholar
  • 42 Behan M W, Holm N R, Curzen N P et al. Simple or complex stenting for bifurcation coronary lesions: a patient-level pooled-analysis of the Nordic Bifurcation Study and the British Bifurcation Coronary Study.  Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2011;  4 57-64 [Epub 2011 Jan 4]
    Google Scholar
  • 43 Mehran R, Claessen B E, Godino C et al. ; Multinational Chronic Total Occlusion Registry. Long-term outcome of percutaneous coronary intervention for chronic total occlusions.  JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2011;  4 952-961
    Google Scholar
  • 44 Ioannis I, Schmidt T, Bonizzoni E et al. Incidence, Predictors, and Outcome of Thrombosis After Successful Implantation of Drug-Eluting Stents.  JAMA. 2005;  293 2126-2130
    Google Scholar
  • 45 Mauri L et al. Stent thrombosis in randomized clinical trials of drug-eluting stents.  N Engl J Med. 2007;  356 1020-1029
    Google Scholar
  • 46 Camenzind E, Steg P G, Wijns W. Stent thrombosis late after implantation of first-generation drug-eluting stents: a cause for concern.  Circulation. 2007;  115 1440-1455
    Google Scholar
  • 47 Holmes jr D R et al. Thrombosis and drug-eluting stents: an objective appraisal.  J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;  50 109-118
    Google Scholar
  • 48 Mauri L et al. Stent thrombosis in randomized clinical trials of drug-eluting stents.  N Engl J Med. 2007;  356 1020-1029
    Google Scholar
  • 49 Brodie B, Pokharel Y, Fleishman N et al. Very late stent thrombosis after primary percutaneous coronary intervention with bare-metal and drug-eluting stents for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a 15-year single-center experience.  JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2011;  4 30-38
    Google Scholar
  • 50 Spaulding C et al. Sirolimus-eluting versus uncoated stents in acute myocardial infarction.  N Engl J Med. 2009;  355 1093-1104
    Google Scholar
  • 51 Dangas G D, Caixeta A, Mehran R et al., Harmonizing Outcomes With Revascularization and Stents in Acute Myocardial Infarction (HORIZONS-AMI) Trial Investigators. Frequency and predictors of stent thrombosis after percutaneous coronary intervention in acute myocardial infarction.  Circulation. 2011;  123 1745-1756 [Epub 2011 Apr 11]
    Google Scholar
  • 52 Byrne R A, Kastrati A, Massberg S et al., ISAR-TEST 4 Investigators. Biodegradable polymer versus permanent polymer drug-eluting stents and everolimus- versus sirolimus-eluting stents in patients with coronary artery disease 3-year outcomes from a randomized clinical trial.  J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;  58 1325-1331
    Google Scholar
  • 53 van Werkum J W, Heestermans A A, de Korte F I et al. Long-term clinical outcome after a first angiographically confirmed coronary stent thrombosis: an analysis of 431 cases.  Circulation. 2009;  119 828-834 [Epub 2009 Feb 2]
    Google Scholar
  • 54 Lagerqvist B, Carlsson J, Fröbert O et al. Swedish Coronary Angiography and Angioplasty Registry Study Group. Stent thrombosis in Sweden: a report from the Swedish Coronary Angiography and Angioplasty Registry.  Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2009;  2 401-408 [Epub 2009 Sep 8]
    Google Scholar
  • 55 Brar S S et al. Use of drug-eluting stents in acute myocardial infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.  J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;  53 1677-1689
    Google Scholar
  • 56 Mauri L et al. Drug-eluting or bare-metal stents for acute myocardial infarction.  N Engl J Med. 2008;  359 1330-1342
    Google Scholar
  • 57 Lee M S et al. Comparison by meta-analysis of drug-eluting stents and bare metal stents for saphenous vein graft intervention.  Am J Cardiol. 2010;  105 1076-1082
    Google Scholar
  • 58 Sheiban I, Omedé P, Biondi-Zoccai G et al. Update on dedicated bifurcation stents.  J Interv Cardiol. 2009;  22 150-155
    Google Scholar
  • 59 Scheller B et al. Positionspapier der DGK 2011: Medikamente freisetzende Koronarstents und mit Medikamenten beschichtete Ballonkatheter.  Der Kardiologe. 2011;  DOI: 10.1007/s12181-011-0375-6
    Google Scholar
  • 60 Serruys P W, Onuma Y, Dudek D et al. Evaluation of the second generation of a bioresorbable everolimus-eluting vascular scaffold for the treatment of de novo coronary artery stenosis: 12-month clinical and imaging outcomes.  J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;  58 1578-1588
    Google Scholar
  • 61 Costa jr J R, Abizaid A, Costa R et al. 1-year results of the hydroxyapatite polymer-free sirolimus-eluting stent for the treatment of single de novo coronary lesions: the VESTASYNC I trial.  JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2009;  2 422-427
    Google Scholar
  • 62 Tamburino C, La Manna A, Di Salvo M E et al. First-in-man 1-year clinical outcomes of the Catania Coronary Stent System with Nanothin Polyzene-F in de novo native coronary artery lesions: the ATLANTA (Assessment of The LAtest Non-Thrombogenic Angioplasty stent) trial.  JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2009;  2 197-204
    Google Scholar
  • 63 Lee C W, Park D W, Seung K B et al. Comparison of dual drug-eluting Cilotax stent and paclitaxel-eluting Taxus Liberte stent in native coronary artery lesions.  Am J Cardiol. 2011;  107 990-994 [Epub 2011 Feb 4]
    Google Scholar
  • 64 Verheye S, Agostoni P, Dubois C L et al. 9-Month Clinical, Angiographic, and Intravascular Ultrasound Results of a Prospective Evaluation of the Axxess Self-Expanding Biolimus A9-Eluting Stent in Coronary Bifurcation Lesions: The DIVERGE (Drug-Eluting Stent Intervention for Treating Side Branches Effectively) Study.  J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;  53 1031-1039
    Google Scholar
  • 65 Amoroso G, van Geuns R J, Spaulding C et al. Assessment of the safety and performance of the STENTYS self-expanding coronary stent in acute myocardial infarction: results from the APPOSITION I study.  EuroIntervention. 2011;  7 428-436 DOI: 10.4244/EIJV7I4A71
    Google Scholar

Priv.-Doz. Dr. med. Felix Vogt

Medizinische Klinik I, Kardiologie
Universitätsklinik Aachen

Pauwelsstraße 30
52074 Aachen

Email: fvogt@ukaachen.de

      >