Download PDF
Endoscopy 2011; 43(2): 168
DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1256175
Correction

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

A prospective comparison of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration results obtained in the same lesion, with and without the needle stylet

A.  V.  Sahai1 , S.  C.  Paquin1 , G.  Gariépy2
  • 1Department of Gastroenterology, Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec
  • 2Department of Pathology, Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
26 January 2011 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Correction to:

A prospective comparison of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration results obtained in the same lesion, with and without the needle styletEndoscopy 2010; 42(11): 900-903
DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1255676

Sahai AV, Paquin SC, Gariépy G et al. A prospective comparison of endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration results obtained in the same lesion, with and without the needle stylet. Endoscopy 2010; 42: 900 – 903

In results, primary outcome, paragraph 2, the last sentence The first pass was S+ in 25/46 (54 % [95 % CI 39 – 69]) and S– in 21/46 (46 % [95 % CI 31 – 61]) should read: Due to an unrecognized limitation in the pass assignment sequence, all the cases retained for analysis were S+ first.

      >