Vacuum-Assisted Wound Closure is Superior to Primary Rewiring in Patients with Deep Sternal Wound Infection[*]

Abstract

Objective: Deep sternal wound infections are serious complications after cardiac surgery. The aim of the present study is to compare the outcome after vacuum-assisted wound closure to that after primary rewiring with disinfectant irrigation. The study additionally focuses on defining predictors for the failure of primary rewiring and its impact on postoperative outcome. Methods: Retrospective analysis was performed in 5232 patients who underwent cardiac surgery with a median sternotomy. 192 patients postoperatively developed deep sternal wound infections and were distributed into 2 therapy groups: a vacuum-assisted wound closure (= VAC) group and a primary rewiring (= RW) group, which was subdivided into healing after rewiring (= RW‐h) and failure of rewiring (= RW‐f). These groups were compared statistically to reveal coincidental pre-, intra- and postoperative parameters. Results: Compared to the VAC group, the RW group showed a poorer outcome, although RW baseline characteristics were apparently beneficial. Primary rewiring failed in 45.8 % of all cases, which led to even worse outcomes. Important predictors for failure of primary rewiring were morbid obesity, diabetes mellitus type II, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, preoperatively impaired left ventricular function, postoperatively positive blood and wound cultures, bilateral harvesting of internal thoracic arteries and the need for surgical reexploration. Conclusions: In spite of patients being in a worse condition, vacuum-assisted wound closure therapy resulted in improved outcomes and thus should be preferred to primary rewiring. Moreover we report on predictors which may indicate whether there is a high risk of rewiring failure.

Key words

deep sternal wound infection - vacuum‐assisted wound closure - primary rewiring - outcome - cardiac surgery

1 The content of this paper was presented at the 39^th annual meeting of the German Society for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Stuttgart, February 15^th, 2010.

References

• 1 Schimmer C, Sommer S P, Bensch M, Elert O, Leyh R. Management of poststernotomy mediastinitis: experience and results of different therapy modalities.  Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008;  56 (4) 200-204
• 2 Milano C A, Kesler K, Archibald N, Sexton D J, Jones R H. Mediastinitis after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Risk factors and long-term survival.  Circulation. 1995;  92 (8) 2245-2251
• 3 Borger M A, Rao V, Weisel R D et al. Deep sternal wound infection: risk factors and outcomes.  Ann Thorac Surg. 1998;  65 (4) 1050-1056
• 4 Olsen M A, Lock-Buckley P, Hopkins D, Polish L B, Sundt T M, Fraser V J. The risk factors for deep and superficial chest surgical-site infections after coronary artery bypass graft surgery are different.  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2002;  124 (1) 136-145
• 5 Lu J C, Grayson A D, Jha P, Srinivasan A K, Fabri B M. Risk factors for sternal wound infection and mid-term survival following coronary artery bypass surgery.  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2003;  23 (6) 943-949
• 6 Sjögren J, Malmsjö M, Gustafsson R, Ingemansson R. Poststernotomy mediastinitis: a review of conventional surgical treatments, vacuum-assisted closure therapy and presentation of the Lund University Hospital mediastinitis algorithm.  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2006;  30 (6) 898-905
• 7 Nakano J, Okabayashi H, Hanyu M et al. Risk factors for wound infection after off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: should bilateral internal thoracic arteries be harvested in patients with diabetes?.  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008;  135 (3) 540-545
• 8 El Oakley R M, Wright J E. Postoperative mediastinitis: classification and management.  Ann Thorac Surg. 1996;  61 (3) 1030-1036
• 9 Rand R P, Cochran R P, Aziz S et al. Prospective trial of catheter irrigation and muscle flaps for sternal wound infection.  Ann Thorac Surg. 1998;  65 (4) 1046-1049
• 10 Douville E C, Asaph J W, Dworkin R J et al. Sternal preservation: a better way to treat most sternal wound complications after cardiac surgery.  Ann Thorac Surg. 2004;  78 (5) 1659-1664
• 11 Fleck T, Gustafsson R, Harding K et al. The management of deep sternal wound infections using vacuum assisted closure (V.A.C.) therapy.  Int Wound J. 2006;  3 (4) 273-280
• 12 Segers P, de Jong A P, Kloek J J, de Mol B A. Poststernotomy mediastinitis: comparison of two treatment modalities.  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2005;  4 (6) 555-560
• 13 Sjögren J, Gustafsson R, Nilsson J, Malmsjö M, Ingemansson R. Clinical outcome after poststernotomy mediastinitis: vacuum-assisted closure versus conventional treatment.  Ann Thorac Surg. 2005;  79 (6) 2049-2055
• 14 Doss M, Martens S, Wood J P, Wolff J D, Baier C, Moritz A. Vacuum-assisted suction drainage versus conventional treatment in the management of poststernotomy osteomyelitis.  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2002;  22 (6) 934-938
• 15 Tocco M P, Costantino A, Ballardini M et al. Improved results of the vacuum assisted closure and Nitinol clips sternal closure after postoperative deep sternal wound infection.  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2009;  35 (5) 833-838
• 16 Ennker I C, Pietrowski D, Vöhringer L et al. Surgical debridement, vacuum therapy and pectoralis plasty in poststernotomy mediastinitis.  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2009;  62 (11) 1479-1483
• 17 Tang G H, Maganti M, Weisel R D, Borger M A. Prevention and management of deep sternal wound infection.  Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2004;  16 (1) 62-69
• 18 Saso S, James D, Vecht J A et al. Effect of skeletonization of the internal thoracic artery for coronary revascularization on the incidence of sternal wound infection.  Ann Thorac Surg. 2010;  89 (2) 661-670

1 The content of this paper was presented at the 39^th annual meeting of the German Society for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Stuttgart, February 15^th, 2010.