The Fate of the Pulmonary Autograft in the Aortic Position: Experience and Results of 98 Patients in Twelve Years

Abstract

Objective: The ideal prosthesis for aortic valve replacement in infants and adolescents is still controversially discussed. Implantation of mechanical prostheses or homografts is associated with serious risks such as reoperations, thromboembolic events and infections. This has led many surgeons to prefer the Ross operation. Methods: Between 1996 and 2008 we performed Ross operations in 98 children and infants with a mean age of 11 years (range 1 mo–25 y), including concomitant procedures (n = 33). The operation was performed as a full-root replacement in 97 and as a subcoronary implantation in one patient. The patients were followed for up to twelve years (follow-up complete) to determine clinical and echocardiographic parameters. Mean duration of follow-up was 60 ± 37 (range 3–150 months). Results: Overall survival was 98 % (n = 96). In 70 patients (71.4 %) no autograft insufficiency (AI) could be observed. AI grade I was present in 22 patients (22.4 %), AI grade II in 3 patients (3 %), and AI grade III in one patient. The autograft in the latter patient was replaced by a mechanical prosthesis. Aortic root dilatation was observed in 10 patients (10.2 %). Z-score (median) in these patients was 4.1 (normal z-score ≤ 2.4). One patient with aortic root dilatation was reoperated. A pacemaker was implanted in two patients. No patient is on constant anticoagulants. Conclusion: The anatomy and physiology of the LVOT is best restored by the implantation of a pulmonary autograft. This additionally provides a growth potential for infants at low risk for reoperations. Autograft dilatation is a risk that requires constant evaluation.

Key words

aortic disease - heart valve surgery - heart disease

Refefences

• 1 Ross D N. Replacement of aortic and mitral valves with a pulmonary autograft.  Lancet. 1967;  2 956-958
• 2 Brown J W, Ruzmetov M, Vijay P, Rodefeld M D, Turrentine M W. Surgery for aortic stenosis in children: a 40-year experience.  Ann Thorac Surg. 2003;  76 1398-1411
• 3 Alexiou C, McDonald A, Langley S M et al. Aortic valve replacement in children: are mechanical prostheses a good option?.  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2000;  17 125-133
• 4 Cabalka A K, Emery R W, Petersen R J, Helseth H K, Jakkula M, Arom K V, Nikoloff D M. Long term follow-up of the St. Jude medical prosthesis in pediatric patients.  Ann Thorac Surg. 1995;  60 S618-S623
• 5 Emery R W, Erickson C A, Arom K V, Northrup III W F, Kersten T E, Von Rueden T J, Lillehei T J, Nicoloff D M. Replacement of the aortic valve in patients under 50 years of age: long-term follow-up of the St. Jude medical prosthesis.  Ann Thorac Surg. 2003;  75 1815-1819
• 6 Santangelo K, Elkins R C, Stelzer P et al. Normal left ventricular function following pulmonary autograft replacement of the aortic valve in children.  J Card Surg. 1991;  6 (Suppl. 4) 633-637
• 7 Dübener L F, Stierle U, Erasmi A et al. Ross procedure and left ventricular mass regression.  Circulation. 2005;  112 I415-I422
• 8 Solymar L, Sydow G, Holmgren D. Increase in size of the pulmonary autograft after the Ross operation in children: growth or dilation?.  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2000;  119 4-9
• 9 Ohye R G, Gomez C A, Ohye B J, Goldberg C S, Bove E L. The Ross/Konno procedure in neonates and infants: intermediate-term survival and autograft function.  Ann Thorac Surg. 2001;  72 (3) 823-830
• 10 Elkins R C, Lane M M, McCue C. Ross operation in children: late results.  J Heart Valve Dis. 2001;  10 (6) 736-741
• 11 Alphonso N, Baghai M, Dhital K, Mood G, Tulloh R, Austin C, Anderson D. Midterm results of the Ross procedure.  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2004;  25 (6) 925-930
• 12 Hraska V, Krajci M, Haun C, Ntalakoura K, Razek V, Lacour-Gayet F, Weil J, Reichenspurner H. Ross and Ross-Konno procedure in children and adolescents: mid-term results.  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2004;  25 (5) 742-747
• 13 Elkins R C, Thompson D M, Lane M M, Elkins C C, Peyton M D. Ross operation: 16 years' experience.  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008;  136 623-630.e5
• 14 Luciani G B, Favaro A, Casali G, Santini F, Mazzucco F. Ross operation in the young.  Ann Thorac Surg. 2005;  80 2271-2277
• 15 Böhm J O, Botha C A, Horke A, Hemmer W, Roser D, Blumenstock G, Uhlemann F, Rein J-G. Is the Ross operation still an acceptable option in children and adolescents.  Ann Thorac Surg. 2006;  82 940-947
• 16 Simon-Kupilik N, Bialy J, Moidl R et al. Dilatation of the autograft root after the Ross operation.  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2002;  21 470-473
• 17 Alsoufi B, Al-Halees Z, Manlhiot C, McCrindle B W, Al-Ahmadi M, Sallehuddin A, Canver C, Bulbul Z, Joufan M, Fadel B. Aortic and mitral valve replacement in children: is there any role for biologic and bioprosthetic substitutes.  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2009;  36 84-90
• 18 Karamlou T, Jang K, Williams W G, Caldarone C A, Arsdell G, Coles J G, McCrindle B. Aortic valve replacement in children.  Circ. 2005;  112 3462-3469
• 19 Hazekamp M G, Grotenhuis H B, Schoof P H, Rijlaarsdam M E B, Ottenkamp J, Dion R A E. Results of the Ross operation in a pediatric population.  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2005;  27 975-979
• 20 Kouchoukos N T, Masetti P, Nickerson N J, Castner C F, Shannon W D, Davila-Roman V G. The Ross procedure: long-term clinical and echocardiographic follow-up.  Ann Thorac Surg. 2004;  78 773-781
• 21 Luciani G B, Casali G, Favaro A et al. Fate of the aortic root late after Ross operation.  Circulation. 2003;  108 (Suppl. II) II61-II67
• 22 Svensson G, Aljassim O, Svensson S E, Bech-Hanssen O, Kjellman U. Anatomic mismatch of the pulmonary autograft in the aortic root may be the cause of early aortic insufficiency after the Ross procedure.  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2002;  21 (6) 1049-1054
• 23 David T E, Omran A, Ivanon J et al. Dilation of the pulmonary autograft after the Ross procedure.  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2000;  119 210-220
• 24 Ergin M A, Spielvogel D, Apaydin A, Lansman S L, McCullough J N, Galla J D et al. Surgical treatment of the dilated ascending aorta: when and how?.  Ann Thorac Surg. 1999;  67 1834-1839
• 25 Gleason T G, Brinster D R, Bavaria J E. Ascending aortic aneurysm. Yang SC, Cameron DE Current therapy in thoracic and cardiovascular Surgery. 1st ed. Philadelphia; Mosby, Inc. 2004: 580
• 26 Hörer J, Hanke T, Stierle U, Takkenberg J J M, Bogers J J C, Hemmer W, Rein J G, Hetzer R, Hübler M, Robinson D R, Sievers H H, Lange R. Neoaortic root diameters and aortic regurgitation in children after the Ross operation.  Ann Thorac Surg. 2009;  88 594-600
• 27 Walker T, Heinemann M K, Schneider W, Wehrmann M, Bultmann B, Ziemer G. Early failure of the autograft valve after the Ross procedure.  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2001;  122 (1) 187-188
• 28 De Kerchove L, Rubay J, Pasquet A, Poncelet A, Ovaert C, Pirotte M, Buche M, D'Hoore W, Noirhomme P, El Khoury G. Ross Operation in the adult: long-term outcomes after root replacement and inclusion techniques.  Ann Thorac Surg. 2009;  87 95-102
• 29 Purohit M, Kitchiner D, Pozzi M. Contegra bovine jugular vein right ventricle to pulmonary artery conduit in Ross procedure.  Ann Thorac Surg. 2004;  77 1707-1710
• 30 Hörer J, Stierle U, Bogers J J C, Rein J G, Hetzer R, Sievers H H, Lange R. Re-interventions on the autograft and the homograft after the Ross operation in children.  Eur J Cardthorac Surg. ;  DOI: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2009.10.032
• 31 Boethig D, Thies W R, Hecker H, Breymann T. Mid term course after pediatric right ventricular outflow tract reconstruction: a comparison of homografts, porcine xenografts and Contegras.  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2005;  27 58-66
• 32 Elkins R C et al. Medium-term follow-up of pulmonary autograft replacement of aortic valves in children.  Eur J Cardio Thorac Surg. 1994;  8 379-383