J Reconstr Microsurg 2010; 26(6): 381-389
DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1249604
© Thieme Medical Publishers

Anatomical and Technical Tips for Use of the Superficial Inferior Epigastric Artery (SIEA) Flap in Breast Reconstructive Surgery

Amir H. Dorafshar1 , Michael Januszyk1 , 2 , David H. Song1
  • 1Section of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
  • 2Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
18 March 2010 (online)

ABSTRACT

Techniques for autologous breast reconstruction have evolved to minimize donor-site morbidity and reduce flap-specific complications. When available, the superficial inferior epigastric artery (SIEA) flap represents the optimal method to achieve the former. However, many microsurgeons have been reluctant to adopt this procedure due to technical challenges inherent to the surgery, as well as concerns with the intrinsic capacity of the superficial vessel system to adequately support this flap. This article sets forth a simple approach to the SIEA flap harvest and demonstrates that favorable results may be achieved even for small caliber vessels. A total of 46 patients underwent 53 SIEA breast reconstructions over a 6-year period using a modified approach for pedicle dissection and arterial inclusion criteria solely on the basis of presence of a palpable pulse. Average pedicle length harvested for all SIEA flaps was 6.07 cm; and mean arterial (0.96 mm) and venous (2.27 mm) diameters represent the lowest published values. Three flaps (5.7%) demonstrated fat necrosis or partial flap necrosis, with one (1.9%) complete flap loss. These results compare favorably with those of previous SIEA series employing diameter-based selection criteria, suggesting that the presence of a palpable arterial pulse may be sufficient to permit successful utilization of this flap.

REFERENCES

  • 1 Kroll S S, Marchi M. Comparison of strategies for preventing abdominal-wall weakness after TRAM flap breast reconstruction.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1992;  89 1045-1051 discussion 1052-1053
  • 2 Blondeel N, Vanderstraeten G G, Monstrey S J et al.. The donor site morbidity of free DIEP flaps and free TRAM flaps for breast reconstruction.  Br J Plast Surg. 1997;  50 322-330
  • 3 Wu L C, Bajaj A, Chang D W, Chevray P M. Comparison of donor-site morbidity of SIEA, DIEP, and muscle-sparing TRAM flaps for breast reconstruction.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;  122 702-709
  • 4 Allen R. The superficial inferior epigastric artery free flap: an anatomic and clinical study for the use in reconstruction of the breast. Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Meeting of the Southeastern Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons, Kiawah, SC June 3–7 1990
  • 5 Grotting J C. The free abdominoplasty flap for immediate breast reconstruction.  Ann Plast Surg. 1991;  27 351-354
  • 6 Chevray P M. Breast reconstruction with superficial inferior epigastric artery flaps: a prospective comparison with TRAM and DIEP flaps.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;  114 1077-1083 discussion 1084-1085
  • 7 Selber J C, Samra F, Bristol M et al.. A head-to-head comparison between the muscle-sparing free TRAM and the SIEA flaps: is the rate of flap loss worth the gain in abdominal wall function?.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;  122 348-355
  • 8 Spiegel A J, Khan F N. An intraoperative algorithm for use of the SIEA flap for breast reconstruction.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;  120 1450-1459
  • 9 Arnez Z M, Khan U, Pogorelec D, Planinsek F. Rational selection of flaps from the abdomen in breast reconstruction to reduce donor site morbidity.  Br J Plast Surg. 1999;  52 351-354
  • 10 Ulusal B G, Cheng M H, Wei F C, Ho-Asjoe M, Song D. Breast reconstruction using the entire transverse abdominal adipocutaneous flap based on unilateral superficial or deep inferior epigastric vessels.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;  117 1395-1403 discussion 1404-1406
  • 11 Granzow J W, Levine J L, Chiu E S, LoTempio M M, Allen R J. Breast reconstruction with perforator flaps.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;  120 1-12
  • 12 Stern H S, Nahai F. The versatile superficial inferior epigastric artery free flap.  Br J Plast Surg. 1992;  45 270-274
  • 13 Taylor G I, Daniel R K. The anatomy of several free flap donor sites.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1975;  56 243-253
  • 14 Arnez Z M, Khan U, Pogorelec D, Planinsek F. Breast reconstruction using the free superficial inferior epigastric artery (SIEA) flap.  Br J Plast Surg. 1999;  52 276-279
  • 15 Vega S J, Bossert R P, Serletti J M. Improving outcomes in bilateral breast reconstruction using autogenous tissue.  Ann Plast Surg. 2006;  56 487-490 discussion 490-491
  • 16 Reardon C M, O’Ceallaigh S, O’Sullivan S T. An anatomical study of the superficial inferior epigastric vessels in humans.  Br J Plast Surg. 2004;  57 515-519
  • 17 Allen R, Heitland A. Superficial inferior epigastric artery flap for breast reconstruction.  Semin Plast Surg. 2002;  16 35-43
  • 18 Casey III W J, Chew R T, Rebecca A M, Smith A A, Collins J M, Pockaj B A. Advantages of preoperative computed tomography in deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap breast reconstruction.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;  123 1148-1155
  • 19 Rozen W M, Houseman N D, Ashton M W. The absent inferior epigastric artery: a unique anomaly and implications for deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flaps.  J Reconstr Microsurg. 2009;  25 289-293
  • 20 Ayhan S, Oktar S O, Tuncer S et al.. Correlation between vessel diameters of superficial and deep inferior epigastric systems: Doppler ultrasound assessment.  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2008;  62 1140-1147
  • 21 Zenn M R. Insetting of the superficial inferior epigastric artery flap in breast reconstruction.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;  117 1407-1411
  • 22 Imanishi N, Nakajima H, Minabe T, Chang H, Aiso S. Anatomical relationship between arteries and veins in the paraumbilical region.  Br J Plast Surg. 2003;  56 552-556
  • 23 Stevenson T R, Hester T R, Duus E C, Dingman R O. The superficial inferior epigastric artery flap for coverage of hand and forearm defects.  Ann Plast Surg. 1984;  12 333-339
  • 24 Schaverien M, Saint-Cyr M, Arbique G, Brown S A. Arterial and venous anatomies of the deep inferior epigastric perforator and superficial inferior epigastric artery flaps.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;  121 1909-1919
  • 25 Holm C, Mayr M, Höfter E, Ninkovic M. The versatility of the SIEA flap: a clinical assessment of the vascular territory of the superficial epigastric inferior artery.  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2007;  60 946-951
  • 26 de Weerd L, Miland A O, Mercer J B. Perfusion dynamics of free DIEP and SIEA flaps during the first postoperative week monitored with dynamic infrared thermography.  Ann Plast Surg. 2009;  62 42-47
  • 27 Wolfram D, Schoeller T, Hussl H, Wechselberger G. The superficial inferior epigastric artery (SIEA) flap: indications for breast reconstruction.  Ann Plast Surg. 2006;  57 593-596
  • 28 Blondeel P N. One hundred free DIEP flap breast reconstructions: a personal experience.  Br J Plast Surg. 1999;  52 104-111
  • 29 Gill P S, Hunt J P, Guerra A B et al.. A 10-year retrospective review of 758 DIEP flaps for breast reconstruction.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;  113 1153-1160
  • 30 Nahabedian M Y, Tsangaris T, Momen B. Breast reconstruction with the DIEP flap or the muscle-sparing (MS-2) free TRAM flap: is there a difference?.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;  115 436-444 discussion 445-446
  • 31 Gusenoff J A, Coon D, De La Cruz C, Rubin J P. Superficial inferior epigastric vessels in the massive weight loss population: implications for breast reconstruction.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;  122 1621-1626

David H SongM.D. M.B.A. 

Section of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Chicago Medical Center

5841 S. Maryland Ave., MC 6035 Chicago, IL 60637

Email: dsong@surgery.bsd.uchicago.edu

    >