A New Evaluation Tool for Monitoring Devices and Its Application to Evaluate the Implantable Doppler Probe

ABSTRACT

Evaluation parameters for free flap monitoring devices are used inconsistently, leading to considerable confusion about the quality and applicability of these devices. A comparison of different systems and different clinical series is almost impossible. The ultimate questions that need to be answered are those regarding the efficiency and the effectiveness of the system. A new tool consisting of two simple parameters that sufficiently and comparably describe the quality of monitoring devices is developed. The flap failure reduction rate describes the percentage of saved flaps (effectiveness). The revision success rate describes the efficiency. Literature reevaluation shows inconsistent results, although all authors describe a positive experience. This shows the limited value of the classical parameters. Larger studies have flap failure reduction rates of 5 to 12% (5 to 12% of monitored flaps are saved). Revision success rates of 75 to 90% prove that the system is efficient enough in daily use. Reevaluation of the smaller reported series result in lower parameters, which shows that there is a significant learning curve for this device. The new parameters alleviate the confusion surrounding evaluation of monitoring systems by giving specific information about effectiveness and efficiency. The benefits of the implanted Doppler probe can now be clearly described. However, in several studies the benefit of the system is overrated.

KEYWORDS

Monitoring - free flaps - Doppler probe

REFERENCES

• 1 Bannasch H, Iblher N, Penna V et al.. A critical evaluation of the concomitant use of the implantable Doppler probe and the Vacuum Assisted Closure system in free tissue transfer.  Microsurgery. 2008;  28 412–416
• 2 Furnas H, Rosen J M. Monitoring in microvascular surgery.  Ann Plast Surg. 1991;  26 265-272
• 3 May Jr J W, Halls M J. Thermocouple probe monitoring for free tissue transfer, replantation, and revascularization procedures.  Clin Plast Surg. 1985;  12 197-207
• 4 Hovius S E, van Adrichem L N, Mulder H D, van Strik R, van der Meulen J C. Comparison of laser Doppler flowmetry and thermometry in the postoperative monitoring of replantations.  J Hand Surg Am. 1995;  20 88-93
• 5 Kaye J J. A reliable, inexpensive temperature monitor for microsurgery.  Orthop Rev. 1987;  16 630-632
• 6 Denneny III J C, Weisman R A, Silverman D G. Monitoring free flap perfusion by serial fluorometry.  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1983;  91 372-376
• 7 Jyränki J, Suominen S, Vuola J, Bäck L. Microdialysis in clinical practice: monitoring intraoral free flaps.  Ann Plast Surg. 2006;  56 387-393
• 8 Guillemaud J P, Seikaly H, Cote D, Allen H, Harris J R. The implantable Cook–Swartz Doppler probe for postoperative monitoring in head and neck free flap reconstruction.  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2008;  134 729-734
• 9 Swartz W M, Izquierdo R, Miller M J. Implantable venous Doppler microvascular monitoring: laboratory investigation and clinical results.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1994;  93 152-163
• 10 Kind G M, Buntic R F, Buncke G M, Cooper T M, Siko P P, Buncke Jr H J. The effect of an implantable Doppler probe on the salvage of microvascular tissue transplants.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998;  101 1268-1273 discussion 1274-1275
• 11 Swartz W M, Jones N F, Cherup L, Klein A. Direct monitoring of microvascular anastomoses with the 20-MHz ultrasonic Doppler probe: an experimental and clinical study.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1988;  81 149-161
• 12 Parker P M, Fischer J C, Shaw W W. Implantable pulsed Doppler cuff for long-term monitoring of free flaps: a preliminary study.  Microsurgery. 1984;  5 130-135
• 13 Pryor S G, Moore E J, Kasperbauer J L. Implantable Doppler flow system: experience with 24 microvascular free-flap operations.  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2006;  135 714-718
• 14 Rosenberg J J, Fornage B D, Chevray P M. Monitoring buried free flaps: limitations of the implantable Doppler and use of color duplex sonography as a confirmatory test.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;  118 109-113 discussion 114-115
• 15 Smit J M, Whitaker I S, Liss A G, Audolfsson T, Kildal M, Acosta R. Post operative monitoring of microvascular breast reconstructions using the implantable Cook-Swartz doppler system: a study of 145 probes & technical discussion.  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2008;  62 1286-1292
• 16 Oliver D W, Whitaker I S, Giele H, Critchley P, Cassell O. The Cook-Swartz venous Doppler probe for the post-operative monitoring of free tissue transfers in the United Kingdom: a preliminary report.  Br J Plast Surg. 2005;  58 366-370
• 17 de la Torre J, Hedden W, Grant III J H, Gardner P M, Fix R J, Vásconez L O. Retrospective review of the internal Doppler probe for intra- and postoperative microvascular surveillance.  J Reconstr Microsurg. 2003;  19 287-290
• 18 Kind G M, Oliva A. Caution with regard to use of the implantable Doppler probe on the internal mammary vein.  J Reconstr Microsurg. 2008;  24 71-72
• 19 Lineaweaver W C. The implantable Doppler probe.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1988;  82 1099-1100