Download PDF
Semin Hear 2010; 31(1): 037-046
DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1246323
© Thieme Medical Publishers

Sound Localization by Cochlear Implant Users

John P. Preece1 , 2
  • 1Department of Communication Sciences, Hunter College, City University of New York
  • 2Audiology Program, The Graduate Center, City University of New York; New York, New York
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
10 March 2010 (online)

Also available at
   Permissions and Reprints

ABSTRACT

Binaural cochlear implantation has become a fairly common phenomenon for adults and children. In addition, many monaural cochlear implant recipients use a hearing aid in the unimplanted ear. One of the rationales for these bilateral fittings is to improve localization of sound sources, at least in the horizontal plane. Several studies have been published on localization using a remarkably wide range of stimuli, speaker arrays, and measurement variables. This article attempts to sort through the variables and find commonalities in the research. It is clear that the majority of adults with bilateral cochlear implants are much better at horizontal localization with two implants compared with one, but their abilities do not reach those of normal-hearing listeners. The localization results for children and for bimodal (cochlear implant in one ear, hearing aid in the other) listeners are less clear, with some improvement over monaural listening, but not for all subjects.

KEYWORDS

Cochlear implant - binaural - bimodal - localization

REFERENCES

  • 1 Noble W, Gatehouse S. Interaural asymmetry of hearing loss, Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ) disabilities, and handicap.  Int J Audiol. 2004;  43 100-114
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Simon H J, Levitt H. Effect of dual sensory loss on auditory localization: implications for intervention.  Trends Amplif. 2007;  11 259-272
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Blauert J. Spatial Hearing. Cambridge, MA; MIT Press 1997
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Slattery W H, Middlebrooks J C. Monaural sound localization: acute versus chronic unilateral impairment.  Hear Res. 1994;  75 38-46
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Wightman F L, Kistler D J. Monaural sound localization revisited.  J Acoust Soc Am. 1997;  101 1050-1106
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Tyler R S, Gantz B J, Rubinstein J T et al.. Three-month results with bilateral cochlear implants.  Ear Hear. 2002;  23 80S-89S
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Van Hoesel R, Ramsden R, O'Driscoll M. Sound-direction identification, interaural time delay discrimination, and speech intelligibility advantages in noise for a bilateral cochlear implant user.  Ear Hear. 2002;  23 137-148
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Tyler R S, Parkinson A J, Wilson B S, Witt S, Preece J P, Noble W. Patients utilizing a hearing aid and a cochlear implant: speech perception and localization.  Ear Hear. 2002;  23 98-105
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Ching T YC, Incerti P, Hill M. Binaural benefits for adults who use hearing aids with cochlear implants in opposite ears.  Ear Hear. 2004;  35 9-21
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Dunn C C, Tyler R S, Witt S A. Benefit of wearing a hearing aid on the unimplanted ear in adult users of a cochlear implant.  J Speech Hear Res. 2005;  48 668-680
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Ching T YC, Hill M, Brew J et al.. The effect of auditory experience on speech perception, localization, and functional performance of children who use a cochlear implant and a hearing aid in opposite ears.  Int J Audiol. 2005;  44 513-520
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Litovsky R Y, Johnstone P M, Godar S et al.. Bilateral cochlear implants in children: localization acuity measured with minimum audible angle.  Ear Hear. 2006;  27 43-59
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Nopp P, Schliech P, D'Haese P. Sound localization in bilateral users of MED-EL COMBI 40/40 + cochlear implants.  Ear Hear. 2004;  25 205-214
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Seeber B U, Fastl H. Location cues with bilateral cochlear implants.  J Acoust Soc Am. 2008;  123 1030-1042
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Senn P, Kompis M, Vischer M, Haeusler R. Minimum audible angle, just noticeable interaural differences and speech intelligibility with bilateral cochlear implants using clinical speech processors.  Audiol Neurootol. 2005;  10 342-352
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 Litovsky R Y, Parkinson A, Arcaroli J et al.. Bilateral cochlear implants in adults and children.  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004;  130 648-654
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Grantham D W, Ashmead D H, Ricketts T A, Labadie R F, Haynes D S. Horizontal-plane localization of noise and speech signals by postlingually deafened adults fitted with bilateral cochlear implants.  Ear Hear. 2007;  28 534-541
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 Wilson B S, Finley C C, Lawson D T, Wolford R D, Zerbi M. Design and evaluation of a continuous interleaved sampling (CIS) processing strategy for multichannel cochlear implants.  J Rehabil Res Dev. 1993;  30 110-116
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 Strutt J W. On our perception of sound direction.  Philos Mag. 1907;  13 214-232
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 Van Hoesel R JM, Tong T C, Hollow R D, Clark G M. Psychophysical and speech perception studies: a case report on a binaural cochlear implant subject.  J Acoust Soc Am. 1993;  94 3178-3189
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 Laback B, Pok S M, Baumgartner W D, Deutsch W A, Schmid K. Sensitivity to Interaural level and envelope time differences of two bilateral cochlear implant listeners using clinical sound processors.  Ear Hear. 2004;  25 488-500
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 22 Grantham D W, Ashmead D H, Ricketts T A, Haynes D S, Labadie R F. Interaural time and level difference thresholds for acoustically presented signals in post-lingually deafened adults fitted with bilateral cochlear implants using CIS + processing.  Ear Hear. 2008;  29 33-44
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 23 Gantz B J, Tyler R S, Rubinstein J T et al.. Binaural cochlear implants: results of subjects implanted bilaterally during the same operation.  Otol Neurotol. 2002;  23 169-180
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 24 Laszig R, Aschendorff A, Stecker M et al.. Benefits of bilateral electrical stimulation with the nucleus cochlear implant in adults: 6-month postoperative results.  Otol Neurotol. 2004;  25 958-968
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 25 Hartmann W M. Localization of sound in rooms.  J Acoust Soc Am. 1983;  74 1380-1391
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 26 Seeber B, Baumann U, Fastl H. Localization ability with bimodal hearing aids and bilateral cochlear implants.  J Acoust Soc Am. 2004;  116 1698-1709
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 27 Neuman A C, Haravon A, Sislian N, Waltzman S B. Sound-direction identification with bilateral cochlear implants.  Ear Hear. 2007;  28 73-82
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 28 Van Hoesel R J, Tyler R S. Speech perception, localization, and lateralization with bilateral cochlear implants.  J Acoust Soc Am. 2003;  113 1617-1630
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 29 Verschuur C A, Lutman M E, Ramsden R, Greenham P, O'Driscoll M. Auditory localization abilities in bilateral cochlear implant recipients.  Otol Neurotol. 2005;  26 965-971
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 30 Van Deun L, van Wieringen A, Van den Bogaert T et al.. Sound localization, sound lateralization, and binaural masking level differences in young children with normal hearing.  Ear Hear. 2009;  30 178-190
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 31 Gray R F, Baguley D M. Sound localization with the Ineraid cochlear implant.  Adv Otorhinolaryngol. 1993;  48 174-176
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 32 Grantham D W, Ricketts T A, Ashmead D H, Labadie R F, Haynes D S. Localization by postlingually deafened adults fitted with a single cochlear implant.  Laryngoscope. 2008;  118 145-151
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 33 Litovsky R Y. Developmental changes in the precedence effect: estimates of minimum audible angle.  J Acoust Soc Am. 1997;  102 1739-1745
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 34 Morrongiello B A, Rocca P T. Infants' localization of sounds within hemifields: estimates of minimum audible angle.  Child Dev. 1990;  61 1258-1270
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 35 Galvin K L, Mok M, Dowell R C, Briggs R J. Speech detection and localization results and clinical outcomes for children receiving sequential bilateral cochlear implants before four years of age.  Int J Audiol. 2008;  47 636-646
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 36 Grieco-Calub T M, Litovsky R Y, Werner L A. Using the observer-based psychophysical procedure to assess localization acuity in toddlers who use bilateral cochlear implants.  Otol Neurotol. 2008;  29 235-239
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 37 Ching T YC, Psarros C, Hill M, Dillon H, Incerti P. Should children who use cochlear implants wear hearing aids in the opposite ear?.  Ear Hear. 2001;  22 365-380
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 38 Byrne D, Dillon H. The National Acoustic Laboratories' (NAL) new procedure for selecting the gain and frequency response of a hearing aid.  Ear Hear. 1986;  7 257-265
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 39 Preece J P, Tyler R S, Rubinstein J T, Gantz B J, van Hoesel J M. Localization by binaural cochlear implant users.  J Acoust Soc Am. 2001;  109 2376
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 40 Brungart D S, Scott K R. The effects of production and presentation level on the auditory distance perception of speech.  J Acoust Soc Am. 2001;  110 425-440
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 41 Tyler R S, Preece J P, Wilson B S et al.. Distance, localization and speech perception pilot studies with bilateral cochlear implants. In: Kubo TY, Takahashi Y, Iwaki T Cochlear Implants – An update. The Hague, The Netherlands; Kugler 2002: 517-522
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar

John P PreecePh.D. 

Hunter College, 425 East 25th St.

New York, NY 10010

Email: jpreece@gc.cuny.edu