Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1246011
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York
Klatskin Tumour: Meticulous Preoperative Work-Up and Resection Rate
Klatskin-Tumor: Detaillierte präoperative Diagnostik und ResektionsratePublication History
manuscript received: 26.2.2010
manuscript accepted: 28.12.2010
Publication Date:
07 April 2011 (online)

Zusammenfassung
Hintergrund: Operatives Vorgehen stellt die einzige potenziell kurative Therapie des hilären Cholangiokarzinoms (hilCC) dar. Höhere Resektionsraten in asiatischen Ländern lassen die Vermutung aufkommen, dass dies durch minutiöse präoperative Diagnostik bedingt ist. Methode: Alle Patienten, die sich zwischen 1998 und 2008 mit hilCC (n = 182) in unserer Einrichtung vorstellten, wurden unserer prospektiv geführten Datenbasis entnommen und in die Studie eingeschlossen. In 75 % dieser Patienten wurde eine präoperative perkutane transhepatische Cholangiografie durchgeführt. Ergebnisse: 123 (68 %) Patienten wurden reseziert. 91 % der Patienten hatten Bismuth-III- und -IV-Tumoren. En-bloc-Resektion von Tumor und entsprechendem Leberlappen war das Standardvorgehen (n = 109). Eine hiläre Resektion erfolgte bei 14 Patienten. Die Resektionsrate betrug 77 % bezogen auf explorierte Patienten. Die Hospitalletalität lag bei 5,7 %. Das 5-Jahres-Überleben nicht operierter Patienten war 0 %, nach Resektion 26 %. Patienten mit R 1-Resektion überlebten signifikant länger als nicht operierte Patienten (p < 0,001). Rechts- und Links-Resektionen wurden mit gleicher Häufigkeit und mit gleichem Überleben durchgeführt. Lymphknotenbefall war der einzige prognostische Prädiktor (p = 0,006). Schlussfolgerung: Eine Resektion sollte wann immer möglich erfolgen, da selbst nach palliativer Resektion eine substanzielle Lebensverlängerung im Vergleich zu nicht operierten Patienten zu erwarten ist. Eine detaillierte präoperative Diagnostik kann offenbar dazu beitragen, eine hohe Resektionsrate bei hilCC zu erreichen, indem zusätzliche Informationen gewonnen werden, die dem Chirurgen ein aggressiveres Vorgehen ermöglichen.
Abstract
Background: Surgery represents the only potentially curative treatment of hilar cholangiocarcinoma (hilCC). It may be suggested that meticulous preoperative work-up in Asian countries leads to higher resection rates. Method: One hundred and eighty-two patients treated in our department between 1998 and 2008 were included in an analysis based on our prospectively recorded database. Among them, 75 % had a percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography as part of their diagnostic work-up. A total of 160 patients underwent explorative surgery and 123 patients were resected (77 % of patients undergoing exploration, 68 % of all patients). Results: Ninety-one percent of the patients were diagnosed to have Bismuth III and IV tumours. En-bloc resection of the tumour and the adjacent liver including segment 1 was the standard procedure in 109 of these patients, while hilar resection was performed in 14 patients. Upon tumour resection, hospital mortality was 5.7 %. Five-year survival in patients without surgery or with mere exploration was 0 %, after resection it reached 26 %. Patients with R 1 resection experienced longer survival than patients without resection (p < 0.001). Right and left hemihepatectomies were performed with identical frequency resulting in identical survival. Lymph node involvement proved to be the only significant predictor of prognosis (p = 0.006). Conclusion: Resection should be performed whenever possible since even after palliative resection survival is substantially increased compared to patients without resection. Meticulous preoperative work-up may contribute to a high resection rate in patients with hilCC by providing additional information allowing the surgeon to perform more aggressive approaches.
Schlüsselwörter
Gallengang - hiläres Cholangiokarzinom - präoperative Diagnostik - Chirurgie - Klatskin-Tumor
Key words
bile ducts - hilar cholangiocarcinoma - diagnostic work-up - surgery - Klatskin tumour
References
- 1
Khan S A, Thomas H C, Davidson B R et al.
Cholangiocarcinoma.
Lancet.
2005;
366
1303-1314
MissingFormLabel
- 2
Igami T, Nishio H, Ebata T et al.
Surgical treatment of hilar cholangiocarcinoma in the ”new era”: the Nagoya University
experience.
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg.
2010;
17
449-454
MissingFormLabel
- 3
Kloek J J, Ten Kate F J, Busch O R et al.
Surgery for extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: predictors of survival.
HPB.
2008;
10
190-195
MissingFormLabel
- 4
Launois B, Reding R, Lebeau G et al.
Surgery for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: French experience in a collective survey of
552 extrahepatic bile duct cancers.
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg.
2000;
7
128-134
MissingFormLabel
- 5
Lee S G, Song G W, Hwang S et al.
Surgical treatment of hilar cholangiocarcinoma in the new era: the Asan experience.
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg.
2010;
17
476-489
MissingFormLabel
- 6
Rocha F G, Matsuo K, Blumgart L H et al.
Hilar cholangiocarcinoma: the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center experience.
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg.
2010;
17
490-496
MissingFormLabel
- 7
Zhang B H, Cheng Q B, Luo X J et al.
Surgical therapy for hiliar cholangiocarcinoma: analysis of 198 cases.
Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int.
2006;
5
278-282
MissingFormLabel
- 8
Ortner M E, Caca K, Berr F et al.
Successful photodynamic therapy for nonresectable cholangiocarcinoma: a randomized
prospective study.
Gastroenterology.
2003;
125
1355-1363
MissingFormLabel
- 9
Zoepf T.
Photodynamic therapy of cholangiocarcinoma.
HPB.
2008;
10
161-163
MissingFormLabel
- 10
Dumoulin F L, Horst E, Sauerbruch T et al.
Palliative locoregional therapy for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: photodynamic therapy
and brachytherapy.
Zentralbl Chir.
2007;
132
336-341
MissingFormLabel
- 11
Golfieri R, Giampalma E, Fusco F et al.
Unresectable hilar cholangiocarcinoma: multimodality treatment with percutaneous and
intraluminal plus external radiotherapy.
J Chemother.
2004;
16 (Suppl 5)
55-57
MissingFormLabel
- 12
Baton O, Azoulay D, Adam D V et al.
Major hepatectomy for hilar cholangiocarcinoma type 3 and 4: prognostic factors and
longterm outcomes.
J Am Coll Surg.
2007;
204
250-260
MissingFormLabel
- 13
Dinant S, Gerhards M F, Rauws E A et al.
Improved outcome of resection of hilar cholangiocarcinoma (Klatskin tumor).
Ann Surg Oncol.
2006;
13
872-880
MissingFormLabel
- 14
Jarnagin W R, Fong Y, DeMatteo R P et al.
Staging, resectability, and outcome in 225 patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma.
Ann Surg.
2001;
234
507-517
; discussion 517 – 509
MissingFormLabel
- 15
Witzigmann H, Berr F, Ringel U et al.
Surgical and palliative management and outcome in 184 patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma:
palliative photodynamic therapy plus stenting is comparable to r1 /r2 resection.
Ann Surg.
2006;
244
230-239
MissingFormLabel
- 16
Nimura Y.
Preoperative biliary drainage before resection for cholangiocarcinoma (Pro).
HPB.
2008;
10
130-133
MissingFormLabel
- 17
Tsao J I, Nimura Y, Kamiya J et al.
Management of hilar cholangiocarcinoma: comparison of an American and a Japanese experience.
Ann Surg.
2000;
232
166-174
MissingFormLabel
- 18
Romaneehsen B, Otto G, Lohse A W et al.
Diagnostic imaging of hilar cholangiocarcinoma: preoperative evaluation of ERC, MRC
and PTC in comparison with histopathology.
Fortschr Röntgenstr.
2004;
176
1750-1758
MissingFormLabel
- 19
Miyakawa S, Ishihara S, Takada T et al.
Flowcharts for the management of biliary tract and ampullary carcinomas.
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg.
2008;
15
7-14
MissingFormLabel
- 20
Nagino M.
Surgical strategy for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: comparison between Japan and Europe.
Nippon Geka Gakkai Zasshi.
2008;
109
349-354
MissingFormLabel
- 21
Slattery J M, Sahani D V.
What is the current state-of-the-art imaging for detection and staging of cholangiocarcinoma?.
Oncologist.
2006;
11
913-922
MissingFormLabel
- 22
Tsukada K, Takada T, Miyazaki M et al.
Diagnosis of biliary tract and ampullary carcinomas.
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg.
2008;
15
31-40
MissingFormLabel
- 23
Chen H W, Lai E C, Pan A Z et al.
Preoperative assessment and staging of hilar cholangiocarcinoma with 16-multidetector
computed tomography cholangiography and angiography.
Hepatogastroenterology.
2009;
56
578-583
MissingFormLabel
- 24
Cho E S, Park M S, Yu J S et al.
Biliary ductal involvement of hilar cholangiocarcinoma: multidetector computed tomography
versus magnetic resonance cholangiography.
J Comput Assist Tomogr.
2007;
31
72-78
MissingFormLabel
- 25
Park H S, Lee J M, Choi J Y et al.
Preoperative evaluation of bile duct cancer: MRI combined with MR cholangiopancreatography
versus MDCT with direct cholangiography.
Am J Roentgenol.
2008;
190
396-405
MissingFormLabel
- 26
Unno M, Okumoto T, Katayose Y et al.
Preoperative assessment of hilar cholangiocarcinoma by multidetector row computed
tomography.
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg.
2007;
14
434-440
MissingFormLabel
- 27
Ito F, Agni R, Rettammel R J et al.
Resection of hilar cholangiocarcinoma: concomitant liver resection decreases hepatic
recurrence.
Ann Surg.
2008;
248
273-279
MissingFormLabel
- 28
Nimura Y.
Radical surgery of left-sided klatskin tumors.
HPB.
2008;
10
168-170
MissingFormLabel
- 29
Shimizu H, Kimura F, Yoshidome H et al.
Aggressive surgical resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma of the left-side predominance:
radicality and safety of left-sided hepatectomy.
Ann.
Surg;
251
281-286
MissingFormLabel
- 30
Mizumoto R, Kawarada Y, Suzuki H.
Surgical treatment of hilar carcinoma of the bile duct.
Surg Gynecol Obstet.
1986;
162
153-158
MissingFormLabel
- 31
Nimura Y, Hayakawa N, Kamiya J et al.
Hepatic segmentectomy with caudate lobe resection for bile duct carcinoma of the hepatic
hilus.
World J Surg.
1990;
14
535-543
; discussion 544
MissingFormLabel
- 32
Dinant S, Gerhards M F, Busch O R et al.
The importance of complete excision of the caudate lobe in resection of hilar cholangiocarcinoma.
HPB.
2005;
7
263-267
MissingFormLabel
- 33
Ebata T, Nagino M, Kamiya J et al.
Hepatectomy with portal vein resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: audit of 52 consecutive
cases.
Ann Surg.
2003;
238
720-727
MissingFormLabel
- 34
Han F, Zhou J X, Zhang L et al.
Hepatectomy with portal vein resection and reconstruction in the treatment of hilar
cholangiocarcinoma.
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi.
2007;
45
763-765
MissingFormLabel
- 35
Miyazaki M, Kato A, Ito H et al.
Combined vascular resection in operative resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: does
it work or not?.
Surgery.
2007;
141
581-588
MissingFormLabel
- 36
Munoz L, Roayaie S, Maman D et al.
Hilar cholangiocarcinoma involving the portal vein bifurcation: long-term results
after resection.
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg.
2002;
9
237-241
MissingFormLabel
- 37
Neuhaus P, Jonas S, Settmacher U et al.
Surgical management of proximal bile duct cancer: extended right lobe resection increases
resectability and radicality.
Langenbecks Arch Surg.
2003;
388
194-200
MissingFormLabel
- 38
Hirano S, Kondo S, Tanaka E et al.
No-touch resection of hilar malignancies with right hepatectomy and routine portal
reconstruction.
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg.
2009;
16
502-507
MissingFormLabel
- 39
Endo I, House M G, Klimstra D S et al.
Clinical significance of intraoperative bile duct margin assessment for hilar cholangiocarcinoma.
Ann Surg Oncol.
2008;
15
2104-2112
MissingFormLabel
- 40
Sasaki R, Takeda Y, Funato O et al.
Significance of ductal margin status in patients undergoing surgical resection for
extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.
World J Surg.
2007;
31
1788-1796
MissingFormLabel
- 41
Hidalgo E, Asthana S, Nishio H et al.
Surgery for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: the Leeds experience.
Eur J Surg Oncol.
2008;
34
787-794
MissingFormLabel
Prof. Dr. Gerd Otto
Department of Transplantation and Hepatobiliopancreatic Surgery, Johannes Gutenberg
University Mainz
Langenbeckstr. 1
55101 Mainz
Germany
Phone: ++ 49/61 31/17 36 13
Fax: ++ 49/61 31/17 55 54
Email: otto@transplantation.klinik.uni-mainz.de