Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1245810
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York
Kontingenzmanagement in der Substitutionsbehandlung Opiatabhängiger
Contingency Management in Opioid Substitution TreatmentPublication History
Publication Date:
24 November 2010 (online)

Zusammenfassung
Die Mehrheit der Opiatabhängigen in Substitutionsbehandlung leidet unter weiteren suchtmittelbezogenen Störungen. Der Beikonsum von Heroin, Alkohol, Benzodiazepinen oder Kokain gefährdet den Erfolg der Substitutionsbehandlung. Eine Intervention zur Behandlung des Beikonsums ist das auf lerntheoretischen Prinzipien basierende Kontingenzmanagement (KM). Im KM wird Drogenabstinenz – verifiziert durch Urintests – kontingent und zeitnah verstärkt. Bei Substitutionspatienten wurden u. a. geldwerte Gutscheine oder Mitgabeprivilegien als Verstärker für suchtmittelfreie Drogen-Urinscreenings eingesetzt. Zahlreiche kontrollierte Studien in den USA belegen einen mittelstarken durchschnittlichen Effekt auf Beikonsum- bzw. Abstinenzraten der Substitutionspatienten. Der Effekt lässt nach Beendigung der Intervention allerdings deutlich nach. Es wird diskutiert, wie sich KM in der deutschen Substitutionspraxis umsetzen und mit anderen Maßnahmen zur Beikonsumreduktion wie selektiven Entgiftungen oder kognitiv-verhaltenstherapeutischen Programmen kombinieren lässt.
Abstract
The majority of opiate-dependent patients in substitution treatment show additional substance-related disorders. Concomitant use of heroin, alcohol, benzodiazepines or cocaine compromises treatment success. Concomitant drug use may be treated by using contingency management (CM) which is based on learning theory. In CM, abstinence from drugs, as verified by drug screenings, is reinforced directly and contingently. Reinforcers used in CM studies with substituted patients were, amongst others, vouchers and take-home privileges. Studies in the USA show a medium average effect of CM on drug consumption rates and abstinence. The effects decrease markedly after the end of the intervention. We discuss whether CM is applicable within the German substitution treatment system and how it can be combined with other interventions such as selective detoxification treatments or cognitive-behavioural programmes.
Schlüsselwörter
Opiatabhängigkeit - Kontingenzmanagement - komorbide substanzbezogene Störungen - Psychotherapie
Keywords
opiate dependence - contingency management - comorbid substance-related disorders - psychotherapy
Literatur
- 1
Kunstmann W, Hessenauer F.
Substitution Opiatabhängiger: Versorgung wird schwieriger.
Dtsch Arztebl.
2009;
106
A-1508 /B-1289 /C-1257
MissingFormLabel
- 2 Senay E C. Opioids: Methadone maintenance. Galanter M, Kleber H D, (ed.) Textbook of Substance Abuse Treatment.. Washington: American Psychiatric Press; 2005: 271-279
MissingFormLabel
- 3
Wittchen H U, Apelt S M, Soyka M et al.
Feasibility and outcome of substitution treatment of heroin-dependent patients in
specialized substitution centers and primary care facilities in Germany: a naturalistic
study in 2694 patients.
Drug Alcohol Depend.
2008;
95
245-257
MissingFormLabel
- 4
Verthein U, Haasen C, Prinzleve M et al.
Cocaine use and the utilisation of drug help services by consumers of the open drug
scene in Hamburg.
Eur Addict Res.
2001;
7
176-183
MissingFormLabel
- 5
Backmund M, Schütz C G, Meyer K et al.
Alcohol consumption in heroin users, methadone-substituted and codeine-substituted
patients – frequency and correlates of use.
Eur Addict Res.
2003;
9
45-50
MissingFormLabel
- 6
Backmund M, Meyer K, Henkel C et al.
Co-consumption of benzodiazepines in heroin users, methadone-substituted and codeine-substituted
patients.
J Addict Dis.
2005;
24
17-29
MissingFormLabel
- 7 Raschke P. Substitutionstherapie. Ergebnisse langfristiger Behandlung von Opiatabhängigen. Freiburg i. Br: Lambertus; 2005
MissingFormLabel
- 8
Stitzer M, Petry N.
Contingency management for treatment of substance abuse.
Annu Rev Clin Psychol.
2006;
2
411-434
MissingFormLabel
- 9 Perrez M, Zbinden M. Lernen. Ehlers A, Hahlweg K, (Hrsg.) Grundlagen der Klinischen Psychologie.. Göttingen: Hogrefe; 1996: 301-349
MissingFormLabel
- 10
Silverman K, Higgins S T, Brooner R K et al.
Sustained cocaine abstinence in methadone maintenance patients through voucher-based
reinforcement therapy.
Arch Gen Psychiatry.
1996;
53
409-415
MissingFormLabel
- 11 Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd. ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1988
MissingFormLabel
- 12
Griffith G A, Rowan-Szal R R, Roark D D.
Contingency management in outpatient methadone treatment: Meta-Analysis.
Drug Alcohol Depend.
2000;
58
55-66
MissingFormLabel
- 13
Prendergast M, Podus D, Finney J et al.
Contingency management for treatment of substance use disorder: a meta-analysis.
Addiction.
2006;
101
1546-1560
MissingFormLabel
- 14
Lussier J P, Heil S H, Mongeon J A et al.
A meta-analysis of voucher-based reinforcement therapy for substance use disorders.
Addiction.
2006;
101
192-203
MissingFormLabel
- 15
Dutra L, Stathopoulou G, Basden S L et al.
A meta-analytic review of psychosocial interventions for substance use disorders.
Am J Psychiatry.
2008;
165
179-187
MissingFormLabel
- 16
Sofuoglu M, Gonzalez G, Poling J et al.
Prediction of treatment outcome by baseline urine cocaine results and self-reported
cocaine use for cocaine and opioid dependence.
Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse.
2003;
29
713-727
MissingFormLabel
- 17
Stitzer M L, Iguchi M Y, Felch L J.
Contingent take-home incentive: effects on drug use of methadone maintenance patients.
J Consult Clin Psychol.
1992;
60
927-934
MissingFormLabel
- 18
Preston K L, Silverman K, Higgins S T et al.
Cocaine use early in treatment predicts outcome in a behavioral treatment program.
J Consult Clin Psychol.
1998;
66
691-696
MissingFormLabel
- 19
Chutuape M A, Silverman K, Stitzer M.
Use of methadone take-home contingencies with persistent opiate and cocaine abusers.
J Subst Abuse Treat.
1999;
16
23-30
MissingFormLabel
- 20
Stitzer M L, Peirce J, Petry N M et al.
Abstinence-based incentives in methadone maintenance: interaction with intake stimulant
test results.
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol.
2007;
15
344-350
MissingFormLabel
- 21
Dallery J, Silverman K, Chutuape M A et al.
Voucher-based reinforcement of opiate plus cocaine abstinence in treatment-resistant
methadone patients: effects of reinforcer magnitude.
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol.
2001;
9
317-325
MissingFormLabel
- 22
Preston K L, Umbricht A, Wong C J et al.
Shaping cocaine abstinence by successive approximation.
J Consult Clin Psychol.
2001;
69
643-654
MissingFormLabel
- 23
Piotrowski N A, Tusel D J, Sees K L et al.
Contingency contracting with monetary reinforcers for abstinence from multiple drugs
in a methadone program.
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol.
1999;
7
399-411
MissingFormLabel
- 24
Stitzer M L, Bigelow G E, Liebson I A et al.
Contingent reinforcement for benzodiazepine-free urines: evaluation of a drug abuse
treatment intervention.
J Appl Behav Anal.
1982;
15
493-503
MissingFormLabel
- 25
Iguchi M Y, Stitzer M L, Bigelow G E et al.
Contingency management in methadone maintenance: effects of reinforcing and aversive
consequences on illicit polydrug use.
Drug Alcohol Depend.
1988;
22
1-7
MissingFormLabel
- 26
Silverman K, Robles E, Mudric T et al.
A randomized trial of long-term reinforcement of cocaine abstinence in methadone-maintained
patients who inject drugs.
J Consult Clin Psychol.
2004;
72
839-854
MissingFormLabel
- 27
Petry N M, Martin B.
Low-cost contingency management for treating cocaine-abusing methadone patients.
J Consult Clin Psych.
2002;
70
398-405
MissingFormLabel
- 28
Peirce J M, Petry N M, Stitzer M L et al.
Effects of lower-cost incentives on stimulant abstinence in methadone maintenance
treatment: a National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical Trials Network study.
Arch Gen Psychiatry.
2006;
63
201-208
MissingFormLabel
- 29
Kidorf M, Brooner R K, King V L et al.
Concurrent validity of cocaine and sedative dependence diagnosis in opioid-dependent
outpatients.
Drug Alcohol Depend.
1996;
42
117-123
MissingFormLabel
- 30
Rhodes G L, Saules K K, Helmus T C et al.
Improving on-time counseling attendance in a methadone treatment program: a contingency
management approach.
Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse.
2003;
29
759-773
MissingFormLabel
- 31
Villano C L, Rosenblum A, Magura S et al.
Improving treatment engagement and outcomes for cocaine-using methadone patients.
Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse.
2002;
28
213-230
MissingFormLabel
- 32
Kidorf M, Stitzer M L, Brooner R K et al.
Contingent methadone take-home doses reinforce adjunct therapy attendance of methadone
maintenance patients.
Drug Alcohol Depend.
1994;
36
221-226
MissingFormLabel
- 33
Iguchi M Y, Belding M A, Morral A R et al.
Reinforcing operants other than abstinence in drug abuse treatment: an effective alternative
for reducing drug use.
J Consult Clin Psychol.
1997;
65
421-428
MissingFormLabel
- 34
Petry N M, Martin B, Cooney J L et al.
Give them prizes and they will come: contingency management for the treatment of alcohol
dependence.
J Consult Clin Psychol.
2000;
68
250-257
MissingFormLabel
- 35
Petry N M, Tedford J, Austin M et al.
Prize reinforcement contingency management for treating cocaine user: how low can
we go, and with whom?.
Addiction.
2004;
99
349-360
MissingFormLabel
- 36
Petry N M, Peirce J M, Stitzer M L et al.
Effect of prize-based incentives on outcomes in stimulant abusers in outpatient psychosocial
treatment programs: a national drug abuse treatment clinical trials network study.
Arch Gen Psychiatry.
2005;
62
1148-1156
MissingFormLabel
- 37
Petry N M, Martin B, Simcic F.
Prize reinforcement contingency management for cocaine dependence: integration with
group therapy in a methadone clinic.
J Consult Clin Psychol.
2005;
73
354-359
MissingFormLabel
- 38
Rogers R E, Higgins S T, Silverman K et al.
Abstinence-contingent reinforcement and engagement in non-drug-related activities
among illicit drug abusers.
Psychol Addict Behav.
2008;
22
544-550
MissingFormLabel
- 39 Ferster C B, Skinner B F. Schedules of reinforcement. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall; 1957
MissingFormLabel
- 40
Chutuape M A, Silverman K, Stitzer M.
Effects of urine testing frequency on outcome in a methadone take-home contingency
program.
Drug Alcohol Depend.
2001;
62
69-76
MissingFormLabel
- 41
Preston K L, Ghitza U E, Schmittner J P et al.
Randomized trial comparing two treatment strategies using prize-based reinforcement
of abstinence in cocaine and opiate users.
J Appl Behav Anal.
2008;
41
551-563
MissingFormLabel
- 42
Ghitza U E, Epstein D H, Schmittner J et al.
Effect of Reinforcement Probability and Prize Size on Cocaine and Heroin Abstinence
in Prize-Based Contingency Management.
J Appl Behav Anal.
2008;
41
539-549
MissingFormLabel
- 43
Roll J M, Huber A, Sodano A R et al.
A comparison of five reinforcement schedules for use in contingency management-based
treatment of methamphetamine abuse.
Psychol Rec.
2006;
56
67-81
MissingFormLabel
- 44
Silverman K, Wong C J, Umbricht-Schneiter A et al.
Broad beneficial effects of cocaine abstinence reinforcement among methadone patients.
J Consult Clin Psychol.
1998;
66
811-824
MissingFormLabel
- 45
Bundesärztekammer .
Richtlinien der Bundesärztekammer zur Durchführung der substitutionsgestützten Behandlung
Opiatabhängiger.
Dtsch Arztebl.
2002;
99
B1218-1221
; novellierte Version: Deutsches Ärzteblatt 2010; 107: A511–A516
MissingFormLabel
- 46
Havemann-Reinecke U, Küfner H, Schneider U et al.
AWMF-Leitlinien: Postakutbehandlung bei Störungen durch Opioide.
Sucht.
2004;
50
226-257
MissingFormLabel
- 47
Kirby K C, Benishek L A, Dugosh K L et al.
Substance abuse treatment providers’ beliefs and objections regarding contingency
management: Implications for dissemination.
Drug Alcohol Depend.
2006;
85
19-27
MissingFormLabel
- 48
Scherbaum N, Kluwig J, Meiering C et al.
Use of illegally acquired medical opioids by opiate-dependent patients in detoxification
treatment.
Eur Addict Res.
2005;
11
193-196
MissingFormLabel
- 49
Bechara A, Damasio H.
Decision-making in addiction (part I): impaired activation of somatic states in substance-dependent
individuals when pondering decisions with negative future consequences.
Neuropsychologia.
2002;
40
1675-1689
MissingFormLabel
- 50
Rosenblum A, Foote J, Magura S et al.
Follow-up of inpatient cocaine withdrawal for cocaine-using methadone patients.
J Subst Abuse Treat.
1996;
13
467-470
MissingFormLabel
- 51
Specka M, Scherbaum N.
Ergebnisse der stationären Entzugsbehandlung von Benzodiazepinen bei Methadonsubstituierten.
Sucht.
2005;
51
329-338
MissingFormLabel
- 52
Chutuape M A, Silverman K, Stitzer M.
Contingent reinforcement sustains post-detoxification abstinence from multiple drugs:
a preliminary study with methadone patients.
Drug Alcohol Depend.
1999;
54
69-81
MissingFormLabel
- 53
Wurst F M, Dürsteler-MacFarland K M, Auwaerter V et al.
Assessment of alcohol use among methadone maintenance patients by direct ethanol metabolites
and self-reports.
Alcohol Clin Exp Res.
2008;
32
1552-1557
MissingFormLabel
- 54
Broers B, Giner F, Dumont P et al.
Inpatient opiate detoxification in Geneva: follow-up at 1 and 6 months.
Drug Alcohol Depend.
2000;
58
85-92
MissingFormLabel
- 55
Rosenblum A, Magura S, Foote J et al.
Treatment intensity and reduction in drug use for cocaine-dependent methadone patients:
a dose-response relationship.
J Psychoactive Drugs.
1995;
27
151-159
MissingFormLabel
- 56
Rawson R A, Huber A, McCann M J et al.
A comparison of contingency management and cognitive-behavioral approaches during
methadone maintenance treatment for cocaine dependence.
Arch Gen Psychiatry.
2002;
59
817-824
MissingFormLabel
- 57
Scherbaum N, Kluwig J, Specka M et al.
Group Psychotherapy for Opiate Addicts in Methadone Maintenance Treatment – A Controlled
Trial.
Eur Addict Res.
2005;
11
163-171
MissingFormLabel
Prof. Norbert Scherbaum
Klinik für abhängiges Verhalten und Suchtmedizin, LVR-Klinikum Essen, Kliniken der
Universität Duisburg-Essen
Virchowstraße 174
45174 Essen
Email: norbert.scherbaum@uni-due.de