Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1245602
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York
Bevölkerungsbezogene Darmkrebsinzidenz im Zeitraum 2000 bis 2006 – Deuten sich erste Auswirkungen des Koloskopie-Screenings an? Eine gemeinsame Auswertung der Krebsregisterdaten aus Bremen, Hamburg, dem Saarland und Schleswig-Holstein
Population-Based Incidence Rates of Colorectal Neoplasms (2000 – 2006) – Has Systematic Colonoscopy Screening an Impact on Incidence? A Combined Analysis of Cancer Registry Data of the Federal States of Bremen, Hamburg, Saarland and Schleswig-HolsteinPublication History
Manuskript eingetroffen: 23.4.2010
Manuskript akzeptiert: 9.7.2010
Publication Date:
01 December 2010 (online)

Zusammenfassung
Hintergrund: Seit 2002 haben krankenversicherte Personen in Deutschland ab dem Alter von 55 Jahren Anspruch auf qualitätsgesicherte Screening-Koloskopien. Primäres Ziel des Screenings ist die frühe Diagnose, langfristig wird eine Senkung der Darmkrebsneuerkrankungen durch die Adenomektomie erwartet. Bislang wurde weder ein systematisches Monitoring epidemiologischer Daten noch eine Mortalitätsevaluation gesetzlich festgeschrieben. Material und Methoden: Die epidemiologischen Krebsregister der Länder Bremen, Hamburg, Saarland und Schleswig-Holstein stellten Inzidenzdaten kolorektaler Karzinome bereit. Altersstandardisierte sowie stadienspezifische Inzidenzraten wurden berechnet, zeitliche Trends durch Joinpoint-Analysen und APC-Methode ermittelt. Ergebnisse: Im Zeitraum 2000 – 2006 wurden rund 34 100 Darmtumoren registriert, 91 % davon in der Altersgruppe 55 + . Der Inzidenzanstieg der In-situ-Tumoren in Kolon und Rektum war signifikant, die Verläufe fortgeschrittener Tumorstadien zeigten keine einheitliche Veränderung. Diskussion: In zeitlichem Zusammenhang mit der Einführung des Koloskopie-Screenings sind Veränderungen in der Epidemiologie kolorektaler Tumoren zu beobachten. Die Veränderungen können jedoch nicht eindeutig mit dem Screening in Verbindung gebracht werden, weil entsprechende bevölkerungsbezogene Daten nicht zur Verfügung stehen. Notwendig wäre ein Abgleich der Screeningteilnehmer mit den Krebsregister-Datenbeständen, um ein Follow-up und eine Mortalitätsevaluation zu ermöglichen.
Abstract
Background: A quality assured colonoscopy screening was implemented in Germany in the year 2002. Persons aged 55 years or older with a health insurance are eligible. The primary aim of colonoscopy screening is the early detection of cancer. Furthermore, an incidence decrease is expected due to systematic adenomectomy. Up to date, neither a systematic monitoring of epidemiological data nor a mortality evaluation has been contracted by law. Materials and Methods: Four population-based cancer registries of the federal states Bremen, Hamburg, Saarland, and Schleswig-Holstein in Germany provided incidence data on colorectal cancers during 2000 – 2006. Age-standardised and stage-specific incidence rates and time trends (Joinpoint analysis and APC method) are reported. Results: Overall 34,100 colorectal cancers were registered, of which 91 % were within the screening-eligible age group. The incidence rise of in situ-cancers of the colon and rectum was significant. Changes in tumours of the T 3- and T 4-categories were not consistent. Discussion: There seems to be a temporal linkage between the implementation of a quality assured colonoscopy screening and the epidemiology of colorectal cancers in Germany. The observed changes cannot be attributed definitively to the screening activities, because required data are not available on the population level. A linkage of screenees and cancer data from registered tumour patients, which allows an individual follow-up and a mortality evaluation, would be desirable.
Schlüsselwörter
kolorektales Karzinom - Koloskopie-Screening - Mortalität - Inzidenz
Key words
colorectal carcinoma - coloscopy screening - mortality - incidence
Literatur
- 1 Robert Koch-Institut und Gesellschaft der Epidemiologischen Krebsregister in Deutschland
e.V .Krebs in Deutschland 2005 – 2006. Häufigkeiten und Trends. Robert Koch-Institut. Berlin; 2010
MissingFormLabel
- 2 Robert Koch-Institut und Gesellschaft der Epidemiologischen Krebsregister in Deutschland
e.V .Krebs in Deutschland 2003 – 2004. Häufigkeiten und Trends. Robert Koch-Institut. Berlin; 2008
MissingFormLabel
- 3
Schmiegel W, Adler G, Fruhmorgen P et al.
Kolorektales Karzinom: Prävention und Früherkennung in der asymptomatischen Bevölkerung
– Vorsorge bei Risikopatienten – Endoskopische Diagnostik, Therapie und Nachsorge
von Polypen und Karzinomen. (Colorectal carcinoma: prevention and early detection
in an asymptomatic population – prevention in patients at risk – endoscopic diagnosis,
therapy and after-care of polyps and carcinomas. German Society of Digestive and Metabolic
Diseases/Study Group for Gastrointestinal Oncology).
Z Gastroenterol.
2000;
38
49-75
MissingFormLabel
- 4
Schmiegel W, Pox C, Adler G et al.
S3-Leitlinienkonferenz „Kolorektales Karzinom” 2004. Leitlinie der Deutschen Gesellschaft
für Verdauungs- und Stoffwechselkrankheiten (Hrsg.).
Dtsch Med Wochenschr.
2005;
130
S5-S53
MissingFormLabel
- 5
www.uptodate.com
.Elektronisches Medizinisches Lehrbuch. http://www.uptodate.com letzter Zugang am 9.4.2008
MissingFormLabel
- 6
Pox C, Schmiegel W, Classen M.
Current status of screening colonoscopy in Europe and in the United States.
Endoscopy.
2007;
39
168-173
MissingFormLabel
- 7
Mansmann U, Crispin A, Henschel V et al.
Bilanz der Qualitätssicherung ambulanter Koloskopien nach 245 000 Untersuchungen.
Deutsches Ärzteblatt.
2008;
105
434-440
MissingFormLabel
- 8 Altenhofen L, Heringer M, Blaschy S et al. Projekt wissenschaftliche Begleitung von Früherkennungs-Koloskopien in Deutschland.
Berichtszeitraum 2007 – 5. Jahresbericht. Version 1.1 Zentralinstitut für die kassenärztliche Versorgung in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Berlin; 2009
MissingFormLabel
- 9
Benson V S, Patnick J, Davies A K et al.
Colorectal cancer screening: a comparison of 35 initiatives in 17 countries.
Int J Cancer.
2008;
122
1357-1367
MissingFormLabel
- 10 Kaiser Familiy Foundation .United States: Medicare Enrollments. http://www.statehealthfacts.org/profileind.jsp?sub=74&rgn=1&cat=6 , eingesehen am 12.2.2010
MissingFormLabel
- 11 Demographics of the United States. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_the_United_States eingesehen am 12.2.2010
MissingFormLabel
- 12
Götzsche P C, Nielsen M.
Screening for breast cancer with mammography.
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.
2006;
18
CD 001877
MissingFormLabel
- 13
Hewitson P, Glasziou P, Watson E et al.
Cochrane systematic review of colorectal cancer screening using the fecal occult blood
test (hemoccult): an update.
Am J Gastroenterol.
2008;
103
1541-1549
MissingFormLabel
- 14
Andriole G L, Crawford E D, Grubb 3 rd R L et al.
Mortality results from a randomized prostate-cancer screening trial.
N Engl J Med.
2009;
360
1310-1319
MissingFormLabel
- 15
Schroder F H, Hugosson J, Roobol M J et al.
Screening and prostate-cancer mortality in a randomized European study.
N Engl J Med.
2009;
360
1320-1328
MissingFormLabel
- 16
Brenner H, Hoffmeister M, Brenner G et al.
Expected reduction of colorectal cancer incidence within 8 years after introduction
of the German screening colonoscopy programme: estimates based on 1,875,708 screening
colonoscopies.
Eur J Cancer.
2009;
45
2027-2033
MissingFormLabel
- 17 Boyl P, Levin B. World Cancer Report 2008. WHO/AIRC. Lyon; 2009
MissingFormLabel
- 18
Brenner H, Arndt V, Sturmer T et al.
Long-lasting reduction of risk of colorectal cancer following screening endoscopy.
Br J Cancer.
2001;
85
972-976
MissingFormLabel
- 19
Citarda F, Tomaselli G, Capocaccia R et al.
Efficacy in standard clinical practice of colonoscopic polypectomy in reducing colorectal
cancer incidence.
Gut.
2001;
48
812-815
MissingFormLabel
- 20
Costantini A S, Martini A, Puliti D et al.
Colorectal cancer mortality in two areas of Tuscany with different screening exposures.
J Natl Cancer Inst.
2008;
100
1818-1821
MissingFormLabel
- 21
Ellul P, Fogden E, Simpson C L et al.
Downstaging of Colorectal Cancer by the National Bowel Cancer Screening Programme
in England: First round data from the first centre.
Colorectal Dis.
2009;
12
420-422
MissingFormLabel
- 22
Jorgensen O D, Kronborg O, Fenger C et al.
Influence of long-term colonoscopic surveillance on incidence of colorectal cancer
and death from the disease in patients with precursors (adenomas).
Acta Oncol.
2007;
46
355-360
MissingFormLabel
- 23
Thiis-Evensen E, Hoff G S, Sauar J et al.
Population-based surveillance by colonoscopy: effect on the incidence of colorectal
cancer. Telemark Polyp Study I.
Scand J Gastroenterol.
1999;
34
414-420
MissingFormLabel
- 24
Thiis-Evensen E, Hoff G S, Sauar J et al.
The effect of attending a flexible sigmoidoscopic screening program on the prevalence
of colorectal adenomas at 13-year follow-up.
Am J Gastroenterol.
2001;
96
1901-1907
MissingFormLabel
- 25
Winawer S J, Zauber A G, Ho M N et al.
Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. The National Polyp Study
Workgroup.
N Engl J Med.
1993;
329
1977-1981
MissingFormLabel
- 26
Winawer S J, Zauber A G, O’Brien M J et al.
The National Polyp Study. Design, methods, and characteristics of patients with newly
diagnosed polyps. The National Polyp Study Workgroup.
Cancer.
1992;
70
1236-1245
MissingFormLabel
- 27
Winawer S J, Zauber A G, O’Brien M J et al.
Randomized comparison of surveillance intervals after colonoscopic removal of newly
diagnosed adenomatous polyps. The National Polyp Study Workgroup.
N Engl J Med.
1993;
328
901-906
MissingFormLabel
- 28
Brenner H, Arndt V, Stegmaier C et al.
Reduction of clinically manifest colorectal cancer by endoscopic screening: empirical
evaluation and comparison of screening at various ages.
Eur J Cancer Prev.
2005;
14
231-237
MissingFormLabel
- 29 National Cancer Institute .Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER). Cancer Statistics. 2010 http://seer.cancer.gov/faststats/index.php accessed: 23.3.2010.
MissingFormLabel
- 30
Kahi C J, Imperiale T F, Juliar B E et al.
Effect of screening colonoscopy on colorectal cancer incidence and mortality.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol.
2009;
7
770-775
; quiz 711
MissingFormLabel
- 31
Brenner H, Hoffmeister M, Stegmaier C et al.
Risk of progression of advanced adenomas to colorectal cancer by age and sex: estimates
based on 840,149 screening colonoscopies.
Gut.
2007;
56
1585-1589
MissingFormLabel
- 32
Ananda S S, McLaughlin S J, Chen F et al.
Initial impact of Australia’s National Bowel Cancer Screening Program.
Med J Aust.
2009;
191
378-381
MissingFormLabel
- 33
Goodyear S J, Stallard N, Gaunt A et al.
Local impact of the English arm of the UK Bowel Cancer Screening Pilot study.
Br J Surg.
2008;
95
1172-1179
MissingFormLabel
- 34
Hoff G, Grotmol T, Skovlund E et al.
Risk of colorectal cancer seven years after flexible sigmoidoscopy screening: randomised
controlled trial.
BMJ.
2009;
338
b1846
MissingFormLabel
- 35
Parente F, Marino B, DeVecchi N et al.
Faecal occult blood test-based screening programme with high compliance for colonoscopy
has a strong clinical impact on colorectal cancer.
Br J Surg.
2009;
96
533-540
MissingFormLabel
- 36
Mandel J S, Church T R, Bond J H et al.
The effect of fecal occult-blood screening on the incidence of colorectal cancer.
N Engl J Med.
2000;
343
1603-1607
MissingFormLabel
- 37
www.gbe-bund.de Gesundheitsberichterstattung des Bundes Hrsg.. Elektronische Ressource. Statistisches Bundesamt, Zweigstelle Bonn. http://www.gbe-bund.de letzer Zugang am 9.4.2008
MissingFormLabel
- 38
Edwards B K, Ward E, Kohler B A et al.
Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975 – 2006, featuring colorectal
cancer trends and impact of interventions (risk factors, screening, and treatment)
to reduce future rates.
Cancer.
2010;
116
544-573
MissingFormLabel
- 39
Winawer S J.
A quarter century of colorectal cancer screening: progress and prospects.
J Clin Oncol.
2001;
19
6S-12S
MissingFormLabel
Dr. Annika Waldmann
Institut für Krebsepidemiologie e. V.
Ratzeburger Allee 160 (Haus 50)
23538 Lübeck
Email: Annika.Waldmann@krebsregister-sh.de