ABSTRACT
Learning how to perform ear reconstruction is very difficult. There are no standardized
teaching methods. This has resulted in many ear reconstructions being suboptimal.
Learning requires a major commitment by the surgeon. Factors to be seriously considered
by those considering performing this surgery are (1) commitment, (2) aptitude, (3)
training methods available, (4) surgical skills and experience, and (5) additional
equipment needs. Unless all these factors are addressed in a surgeon's decision to
perform this form of reconstruction, the end result will be compromised, and patient
care will not be optimized. It is hoped that considering these factors and following
this approach will result in a higher quality of aesthetic result. The future of ear
reconstruction lies in the use of advanced digital technologies and tissue engineering.
KEYWORDS
Ear reconstruction - microtia
REFERENCES
1 Tagliacozzi G. De Curtorum Chirurgia per Insitionem. Venice, Italy; Gaspare Bindoni
1597
2 Gillies H. Plastic Surgery of the Face. London, UK; H. Frowde, Hodder & Stoughton
1920
3
Gillies H.
Reconstruction of the external ear with special reference to the use of maternal as
the supporting structure.
Rev Chir Structive.
1937;
7
169
4
Steffensen W H.
Comments on total reconstruction of the ear.
Plast Reconstr Surg.
1952;
10
186-190
5
Tanzer R C.
Total reconstruction of the external ear.
Plast Reconstr Surg Transplant Bull.
1959;
23
1-15
6
Brent B.
The correction of microtia with autogenous cartilage grafts: I. The classic deformity.
Plast Reconstr Surg.
1980;
66
1-12
7
Brent B.
The correction of microtia with autogenous cartilage grafts: II. Atypical and complex
deformities.
Plast Reconstr Surg.
1980;
66
13-21
8
Brent B.
Technical advances in ear reconstruction with autogenous rib cartilage grafts: personal
experience with 1200 cases.
Plast Reconstr Surg.
1999;
104
319-334
discussion 335-338
9
Nagata S.
A new method of total reconstruction of the auricle for microtia.
Plast Reconstr Surg.
1993;
92
187-201
10 Nagata S.
Microtia: auricular reconstruction . In: Vandervolk CA Plastic Surgery: Indications, Operations, and Outcomes. Vol. 2. St.
Louis, MO; Mosby 2000: 1023-1056
11
Zhang Q, Zhang R, Xu F, Jin P, Cao Y.
Auricular reconstruction for microtia: personal 6-year experience based on 350 microtia
ear reconstructions in China.
Plast Reconstr Surg.
2009;
123
849-858
12
Firmin F.
Ear reconstruction in cases of typical microtia. Personal experience with based on
352 microtic ear corrections.
Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg.
1998;
32
35-47
13
Fukuda O.
The microtic ear: survey of 180 cases in 180 cases in 10 years.
Plast Reconstr Surg.
1974;
53
458-463
14
Cronin T D.
Use of a Silastic frame for total and subtotal reconstruction of the external ear:
preliminary report.
Plast Reconstr Surg.
1966;
37
399-405
15
Romo III T, Morris L G, Reitzen S D, Ghossaini S N, Wazen J J, Kohan D.
Reconstruction of congenital microtia-atresia: outcomes with the Medpor/bone-anchored
hearing aid-approach.
Ann Plast Surg.
2009;
62
384-389
16
Tjellström A.
Osseointegrated implants for replacement of absent or defective ears.
Clin Plast Surg.
1990;
17
355-366
17
Wilkes G H, Wolfaardt J F.
Osseointegrated alloplastic versus autogenous ear reconstruction: criteria for treatment
selection.
Plast Reconstr Surg.
1994;
93
967-979
Gordon H WilkesM.D. F.R.C.S.C.
Clinical Professor and Divisional Director, Division of Plastic Surgery, Co-Director,
Institute of Reconstructive Sciences in Medicine, Covenant Health Group, University
of Alberta
#174 Meadowlark Health Center, 156 Street & 87 Avenue, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T5R
5W9
eMail: gordon.wilkes@albertahealthservices.ca