Prospective Comparative Study of Lumbar Sequestrectomy and Microdiscectomy

Abstract

Introduction: During microsurgical disc operation, usually a sequestrectomy and a nucleotomy are performed. Whether a nucleotomy is necessary in any case is disputed. The aim of this study is to examine this question on the basis of clinical results and to compare rates of recurrence between the two groups.

Methods: A prospective analysis was performed in 100 patients with sequestrectomy and the first 100 consecutive patients with microdiscectomy out of a cohort of 1 245 patients, who were operated by six surgeons between 2003 and 2006. The study is designed with special emphasis on the actual pain status, the functional capacity and recurrence.

Results: Despite more comorbidities the hospitalization was significantly shorter in the sequestrectomy-treated group. This group revealed more favourable results on pain scales (VAS visual analogue scale). The percentage of back pain in the discectomy-treated group was significantly higher. This went along with a significantly higher consumption of painkillers. At follow-up (34 months after surgery on average), there were no differences in the activities of daily live, measured by patient's questionnaires (ODI Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire). Complete questionnaires were available for 46 of the sequestrectomy patients, and for 45 of the discectomy patients. Early reherniation occurred in two patients after discectomy and late reherniation in one patient after sequestrectomy.

Conclusions: Sequestrectomy alone is a safe operative modality. Sequestrectomy does not seem to entail a higher rate of recurrences compared with microdiscectomy and the results are as favourable as or better than results after discectomy.

sequestrectomy - microdiscectomy - disc herniation - lumbar spine - reherniation

References

• 1 Yasargil MG. Microsurgical operation of herniated lumbar disc.  Adv Neurosurg. 1977;  4 81
• 2 Caspar W, Campbell B, Barbier DD. et al . The Caspar microsurgical discectomy and comparison with a conventional standard lumbar disc procedure.  Neurosurgury. 1991;  28 78-87
• 3 Gibson JNA, Grant IC, Waddell G. Surgery for lumbar disc prolapse (Cochrane Review). The Cochrane Library. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., Issue I 2004
• 4 Lagarrigue J, Chaynes P. Comparative study of disk surgery with or without microscopy. A prospective study of 80 cases.  Neurochirurgie. 1994;  40 116-120
• 5 Tullberg T, Isacson J, Weidenhielm L. Does microscopic removal of lumbar disc herniation lead to better results than the standard procedure? Results of a one-year randomized study.  Spine. 1993;  18 24-27
• 6 Östermann H, Seitsalo S, Karppinen J. et al . Effectiveness of microdiscectomy for lumbar disc herniation: a randomized controlled trial with 2 years of follow-up.  Spine. 2006;  31 2409-2414
• 7 Wu X, Zhuang S, Mao Z. et al . Microendoscopic discectomy for lumbar disc herniation: surgical technique and outcome in 873 consecutive cases.  Spine. 2006;  31 2689-2694
• 8 Richter HP, Kast E, Tomczak R. et al . Results of applying ADCON-L gel after lumbar discectomy: the German ADCON-L study.  J Neurosurg. 2001;  95 179-189
• 9 Balderston RA, Gilyard GG, Jones AA. et al . The treatment of lumbar disc herniation: Simple fragment excision vs. disc space curettage.  J Spinal Disord. 1991;  4 22-25
• 10 Faulhauer K, Manicke C. Fragment excision vs. conventional disc removal in the microsurgical treatment of herniated lumbar disc.  Acta Neurochir. 1995;  133 107-111
• 11 Wera GD, Dean CL, Ahn UM. et al . Reherniation and failure after lumbar discectomy: A comparison of fragment excision alone vs. subtotal discectomy.  J Spinal Disord Tech. 2008;  21 316-319
• 12 Kast E, Mohr K, Richter HP. et al . Ergebnisse der alleinigen Sequestrektomie bei lumbaler Bandscheibenoperation.  Orthopäde. 2005;  34 931-937
• 13 Rogers LA. Experience with limited vs. extensive disc removal in patients undergoing microsurgical operations for ruptured lumbar discs.  Neurosurgury. 1988;  22 82-85
• 14 Thomé C, Barth M, Scharf J. et al . Outcome after lumbar sequestrectomy compared with microdiscectomy: a prospective randomized study.  J Neurosurg Spine. 2005;  2 271-278
• 15 Carragee EJ, Han MY, Suen PW. et al . Clinical outcomes after discectomy for sciatica: the effects of fragment type and anular competence.  J Bone Joint Surg [Am]. 2003;  85 102-108
• 16 Messing-Jünger AM, Bock WJ. Lumbale Nervenwurzelkompression – Ergebnisse der Qualitätssicherungsstudie von 1993–1998.  Zentralbl Neurochir. 2001;  4 144-153
• 17 Koho P, Aho S, Watson P. Assessment of chronic pain behaviour: reliability of the method and its relationship with perceived disability, physical impairment and function.  J Rehabil Med. 2001;  33 128-132
• 18 Fairbank JC, Couper J, Davies JB. et al . The Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire.  Physiotherapy. 1980;  66 271-273
• 19 Mannion AF, Junge A, Fairbank JC. et al . Development of a German version of the Oswestry Disability Index. Part 1: cross-cultural adaption, reliability, and validity.  Eur Spine J. 2006;  15 55-65
• 20 Williams RW. Microlumbar discectomy. A 12-year statistical review.  Spine. 1986;  11 851-852
• 21 Striffeller H, Groger U, Reulen HJ. Standard microsurgical lumbar discectomy vs. conservative microsurgical discectomy. A preliminary study.  Acta Neurochir. 1991;  112 62-64
• 22 Wenger M, Mariani L, Kalbarczyk A. et al . Long-term outcome of 104 patients after lumbar sequestrectomy according to Williams.  Neurosurg. 2001;  49 334-335
• 23 Wenger M, Markwalder TM. A novel surgical treatment of lumbar disc herniation in patients with long-standing degenerative disc disease.  J Neurosurg Spine. 2005;  2 515-520
• 24 Markwalder TM, Battaglia M. Failed back surgery syndrome. Part I: Analysis of the clinical presentation and results of testing procedures for instability of the lumbar spine in 171 patients.  Acta Neurochir. 1993;  123 46-51
• 25 Mochida J, Nishimura K, Nomura T. et al . The importance pf preserving disc structure in surgical approaches to lumbar disc herniation.  Spine. 1996;  21 1556-1564
• 26 Yorimitsu E, Chiba K, Toyama Y. et al . Long-term outcomes of standard discectomy for lumbar disc herniation.  Spine. 2001;  26 652-657
• 27 DeKleuver M, Oner FC, Jacobs WCH. Total disc replacement for chronic low back pain: background and a systematic review of the literature.  Eur Spine J. 2003;  12 108-116
• 28 Fu TS, Lai PL, Tsai TT. et al . Long-term results of disc excision for recurrent lumbar disc herniation with or without posterolateral fusion.  Spine. 2005;  30 2830-2834
• 29 Nomura T, Mochida J, Okuma M. et al . Nucleus pulposus allograft retards intervertebral disc degeneration.  Clin Orthop. 2001;  389 94-101
• 30 Prolo DJ, Oklund SA, Butcher M. Towards uniformity in evaluating results of lumbar disc operations. A paradigm applied to posterior lumbar interbody fusions.  Spine. 1986;  11 601-606
• 31 Findlay GF, Hall BI, Musa BS. et al . A 10-year follow-up of the outcome of lumbar microdiscectomy.  Spine. 1998;  23 1168-1171
• 32 Kotilainen E, Valtonen S, Carlson CA. Microsurgical treatment of lumbar disc herniation: Follow-up of 237 patients.  Acta Neurochir. 1993;  120 143-149
• 33 Pappas CT, Harrington T, Sonntag VK. Outcome analysis in 654 surgically treated lumbar disc herniations.  Neurosurgury. 1992;  30 862-866
• 34 Suk KS, Lee HM, Moon SH. Recurrent lumbar disc herniation.  Spine. 2001;  26 672-676
• 35 McCulloch JA. Focus issue on lumbar disc herniation: Macro- and microdiscectomy.  Spine. 1996;  21 ((Suppl 24)) 45S-56S
• 36 Ebeling U, Reichenberg W, Reulen HJ. Results of microsurgical lumbar discectomy. Review on 485 patients.  Acta Neurochir. 1986;  81 45-52
• 37 Davis RA. A long-term outcome analysis of 984 surgically treated herniated lumbar discs.  J Neurosurg. 1994;  80 421-425
• 38 Lowell TD, Errico TJ, Fehlings MG. Microdiskectomy for lumbar disk herniation: A review of 100 cases.  Orthopedics. 1995;  18 985-990
• 39 Kast E, Oberle J, Richter HP. et al . Success of simple sequestrectomy in lumbar spine surgery depends on the competence of the fibrous ring: a prospective controlled study of 168 patients.  Spine. 2008;  33 1567-1571
• 40 Barth M, Weiss C, Thome C. Two-year outcome after lumbar microdiscectomy vs. microscopic sequestrectomy: part 1: evaluation of clinical outcome.  Spine. 2008;  33 265-272

Correspondence