Download PDF
Am J Perinatol 2010; 27(2): 151-155
DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1234034
© Thieme Medical Publishers

Determination of Placental Weight Using Two-dimensional Sonography and Volumetric Mathematic Modeling

Humberto Azpurua1 , Edmund F. Funai1 , Luisa M. Coraluzzi1 , Leo F. Doherty1 , Isaac E. Sasson1 , Merwin Kliman2 , Harvey J. Kliman1
  • 1Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut
  • 2Department of Mathematics, Hofstra University, Hempstead, Long Island
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
03 August 2009 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

ABSTRACT

An abnormally decreased placental weight has been linked to increased perinatal complications, including intrauterine fetal demise (IUFD) and fetal growth restriction (IUGR). Despite its promise, determining placental weight prenatally using three-dimensional systems is time-consuming and requires expensive technology and expertise. We propose a novel method using two-dimensional sonography that provides an immediate estimation of placental volume. Placental volume was calculated in 29 third-trimester pregnancies using linear measurements of placental width, height, and thickness to calculate the convex-concave shell volume within 24 hours of birth. Data were analyzed to calculate Spearman's rho (rs) and significance. There was a significant correlation between estimated placental volume (EPV) and actual placental weight (rs = 0.80, p < 0.001). Subgroup analysis of preterm gestations (n = 14) revealed an even more significant correlation of EPV to actual placental weight (rs = 0.89, p < 0.001). Placental weight can be accurately predicted by two-dimensional ultrasound with volumetric calculations. This method is simple, rapid, and accurate, making it practical for routine prenatal care, as well as for high-risk cases with decreased fetal movement and IUGR. Routine EPV surveillance may decrease the rates of perinatal complications and unexpected IUFD.

KEYWORDS

Placenta - volume - ultrasound - IUFD - IUGR

REFERENCES

  • 1 Kliman H J. Behind every healthy baby is a healthy placenta. In: Berman MR Parenthood Lost. Westport, CT; Bergin & Garvey 2001: 130-131
    Google Scholar
  • 2 Vintzileos A M, Tsapanos V. Biophysical assessment of the fetus.  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1992;  2 133-143
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Gilbert W M, Danielsen B. Pregnancy outcomes associated with intrauterine growth restriction.  Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;  188 1596-1599 discussion 1599-1601
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Garite T J, Clark R, Thorp J A. Intrauterine growth restriction increases morbidity and mortality among premature neonates.  Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;  191 481-487
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Galan H L, Ferrazzi E, Hobbins J C. Intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR): biometric and Doppler assessment.  Prenat Diagn. 2002;  22 331-337
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Bamberg C, Kalache K D. Prenatal diagnosis of fetal growth restriction.  Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2004;  9 387-394
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Harkness U F, Mari G. Diagnosis and management of intrauterine growth restriction.  Clin Perinatol. 2004;  31 743-764, vi
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Baschat A A, Harman C R. Antenatal assessment of the growth restricted fetus.  Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2001;  13 161-168
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Kliman H J. Trophoblast to human placenta. In: Encyclopedia of Reproduction. San Diego; Academic Press 1999: 834-846
    Google Scholar
  • 10 Kliman H J. The placenta revealed.  Am J Pathol. 1993;  143 332-336
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Baschat A A, Hecher K. Fetal growth restriction due to placental disease.  Semin Perinatol. 2004;  28 67-80
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Rotmensch S, Liberati M, Luo J S et al.. Color Doppler flow patterns and flow velocity waveforms of the intraplacental fetal circulation in growth-retarded fetuses.  Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994;  171 1257-1264
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Kliman H J. Uteroplacental blood flow. The story of decidualization, menstruation, and trophoblast invasion.  Am J Pathol. 2000;  157 1759-1768
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Elchalal U, Ezra Y, Levi Y et al.. Sonographically thick placenta: a marker for increased perinatal risk—a prospective cross-sectional study.  Placenta. 2000;  21 268-272
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Metzenbauer M, Hafner E, Schuchter K, Philipp K. First-trimester placental volume as a marker for chromosomal anomalies: preliminary results from an unselected population.  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2002;  19 240-242
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Hafner E, Metzenbauer M, Höfinger D et al.. Comparison between three-dimensional placental volume at 12 weeks and uterine artery impedance/notching at 22 weeks in screening for pregnancy-induced hypertension, pre-eclampsia and fetal growth restriction in a low-risk population.  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2006;  27 652-657
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Chen M, Leung K Y, Lee C P, Tang M H, Ho P C. Placental volume measured by three-dimensional ultrasound in the prediction of fetal alpha(0)-thalassemia: a preliminary report.  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2006;  28 166-172
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Hafner E, Metzenbauer M, Höfinger D et al.. Placental growth from the first to the second trimester of pregnancy in SGA-foetuses and pre-eclamptic pregnancies compared to normal foetuses.  Placenta. 2003;  24 336-342
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Kinare A S, Natekar A S, Chinchwadkar M C et al.. Low midpregnancy placental volume in rural Indian women: a cause for low birth weight?.  Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000;  182 443-448
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Schuchter K, Metzenbauer M, Hafner E, Philipp K. Uterine artery Doppler and placental volume in the first trimester in the prediction of pregnancy complications.  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2001;  18 590-592
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Mercé L T, Barco M J, Bau S. Reproducibility of the study of placental vascularization by three-dimensional power Doppler.  J Perinat Med. 2004;  32 228-233
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Hobbins J. Morphometry of fetal growth.  Acta Paediatr Suppl. 1997;  423 165-168 discussion 169
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Enders A C. Anatomy of the placenta and its relationship to function.  Mead Johnson Symp Perinat Dev Med. 1981;  (18) 3-7
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Brown J B. The value of plasma estrogen estimations in the management of pregnancy.  Clin Perinatol. 1974;  1 273-291
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Grannum P A, Berkowitz R L, Hobbins J C. The ultrasonic changes in the maturing placenta and their relation to fetal pulmonic maturity.  Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1979;  133 915-922
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Manning F A, Platt L D, Sipos L. Antepartum fetal evaluation: development of a fetal biophysical profile.  Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1980;  136 787-795
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Fretts R C, Boyd M E, Usher R H, Usher H A. The changing pattern of fetal death, 1961-1988.  Obstet Gynecol. 1992;  79 35-39
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Silver R M. Fetal death.  Obstet Gynecol. 2007;  109 153-167
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Brodsky D, Christou H. Current concepts in intrauterine growth restriction.  J Intensive Care Med. 2004;  19 307-319
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Craigo S D. The role of ultrasound in the diagnosis and management of intrauterine growth retardation.  Semin Perinatol. 1994;  18 292-304
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Nyberg D A, Abuhamad A, Ville Y. Ultrasound assessment of abnormal fetal growth.  Semin Perinatol. 2004;  28 3-22
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Resnik R. Intrauterine growth restriction.  Obstet Gynecol. 2002;  99 490-496
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Hafner E, Philipp T, Schuchter K, Dillinger-Paller B, Philipp K, Bauer P. Second-trimester measurements of placental volume by three-dimensional ultrasound to predict small-for-gestational-age infants.  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1998;  12 97-102
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Thame M, Osmond C, Wilks R, Bennett F I, Forrester T E. Second-trimester placental volume and infant size at birth.  Obstet Gynecol. 2001;  98 279-283
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Hafner E, Metzenbauer M, Dillinger-Paller B et al.. Correlation of first trimester placental volume and second trimester uterine artery Doppler flow.  Placenta. 2001;  22 729-734
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Smith G C, Fretts R C. Stillbirth.  Lancet. 2007;  370 1715-1725
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Jauniaux E, Ramsay B, Campbell S. Ultrasonographic investigation of placental morphologic characteristics and size during the second trimester of pregnancy.  Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994;  170(1 Pt 1) 130-137
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Abramowicz J S, Sheiner E. In utero imaging of the placenta: importance for diseases of pregnancy.  Placenta. 2007;  28(Suppl A) S14-S22
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Duncan K R, Sahota D S, Gowland P A et al.. Multilevel modeling of fetal and placental growth using echo-planar magnetic resonance imaging.  J Soc Gynecol Investig. 2001;  8 285-290
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Gowland P. Placental MRI.  Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2005;  10 485-490
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Wegrzyn P, Faro C, Falcon O, Peralta C F, Nicolaides K H. Placental volume measured by three-dimensional ultrasound at 11 to 13 + 6 weeks of gestation: relation to chromosomal defects.  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2005;  26 28-32
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Kubik-Huch R A, Wildermuth S, Cettuzzi L et al.. Fetus and uteroplacental unit: fast MR imaging with three-dimensional reconstruction and volumetry—feasibility study.  Radiology. 2001;  219 567-573
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists . ACOG practice patterns. Routine ultrasound in low-risk pregnancy. Number 5, August 1997.  Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1997;  59 273-278
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Harvey J KlimanM.D. Ph.D. 

Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine

Suite 770, 300 George Street, New Haven, CT 06511

Email: harvey.kliman@yale.edu

      >