Endoscopy 2009; 41(11): 929-933
DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1215191
Original article

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

An innovative technique for endoscopic submucosal dissection of early gastric cancer using a new spring device

N.  Sakurazawa1 , S.  Kato1 , M.  Miyashita1 , T.  Kiyama1 , I.  Fujita1 , N.  Yamashita2 , Y.  Saitou2 , T.  Tajiri1 , E.  Uchida1
  • 1Department of Surgery, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan
  • 2Department of Gastroenterology, Tsuboi Hospital, Fukushima, Japan
Further Information

Publication History

submitted22 April 2009

accepted after revision29 July 2009

Publication Date:
02 October 2009 (online)

Preview

Background and study aims: In recent years, endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has been applied for the treatment of gastric tumors, and the en-bloc resection rate of early gastric cancer has greatly improved. Herein, we introduce spring-assisted ESD, for quicker submucosal dissection.

Patients and methods: ESD was carried out in 32 patients (20 men, 12 women; mean age 72.6 years, range 53 – 88 years) for early gastric cancer, with tumors over 10 mm in diameter. The patients were divided retrospectively into two groups (spring-assisted ESD, n = 20; conventional ESD, n = 12). To comparatively evaluate the performance speed of ESD, the circumferential length and the area of the resected specimen were calculated by the approximation formula for ellipse. Then, the circumferential cutting speed, the submucosal dissection speed, and the total ESD speed were calculated as index scores. The scores for spring-assisted ESD and conventional ESD were compared.

Results: The mean (±SD) circumferential cutting speeds in spring-assisted ESD and conventional ESD were 0.53 ± 0.27 and 0.60 ± 0.30 cm/minute, respectively (P = 0.51). The mean submucosal dissection speeds in spring-assisted ESD and conventional ESD were 0.67 ± 0.41 and 0.32 ± 0.24 cm2/minute, respectively (P = 0.005). The mean total ESD speeds in spring-assisted ESD and conventional ESD were 0.25 ± 0.10 and 0.17 ± 0.07 cm2/minute, respectively (P = 0.015). The mean total ESD times were 57 and 75 minutes in the spring and conventional group, respectively (P = 0.30).

Conclusion: Using the aforementioned indices, we evaluated the performance speed of ESD. Spring-assisted ESD may allow faster submucosal dissection.

References

N. SakurazawaMD, PhD 

Department of Surgery
Nippon Medical School

1–1-5 Sendagi Bunkyo-ku
Tokyo 113–8603
Japan

Fax: +81-3-56850989

Email: nsakuraz@nms.ac.jp