Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0028-1109203
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York
Kardiale MRT zur Quantifizierung der mikrovaskulären Obstruktion beim akuten Myokardinfarkt
Quantification of Microvascular Obstruction in Acute Myocardial Infarction using Cardiac MRIPublication History
eingereicht: 22.7.2008
angenommen: 22.1.2009
Publication Date:
07 April 2009 (online)

Zusammenfassung
Ziel: Auftreten und Ausdehnung einer mikrovaskulären Obstruktion (MO) sind neben der Infarktausdehnung wichtige prognostische Faktoren beim akuten Herzinfarkt. Ziel der vorliegenden Studie war es, den Einfluss des zeitlichen Abstands zwischen KM-Injektion und Bildakquisition auf die gemessene MO- und Infarktausdehnung zu untersuchen. Material und Methoden: 50 Patienten mit akutem Myokardinfarkt (40 Männer, mittleres Alter 58,1 ± 11,7 Jahre), die nach perkutaner Revaskularisation einen Grad-3-Fluss nach der Thrombolysis-In-Myocardial-Infarction-Klassifikation im Infarktgefäß aufwiesen, wurden innerhalb von 5 Tagen nach Infarkt an einem 1,5 T-MRT untersucht. 2, 5, 10 und 20 min nach Injektion von 0,2 mmol Gadodiamid (Omniscan®, GE Healthcare Buchler) wurde eine Single-Shot-IR-SSFP-Sequenz (TR 2,4 ms, TE 1,08 ms, TI 180 – 280 ms, FA 50°) akquiriert, welche den gesamten linken Ventrikel innerhalb eines Atemstillstands abdeckte. Infarktgrößen sowie Ausdehnung der MO wurden für jeden Zeitpunkt bestimmt. Ergebnisse: Eine MO konnte 2 min nach KM-Injektion (p. i.) bei 32 Patienten nachgewiesen werden, während 20 min p. i. nur bei 23 Patienten eine MO nachweisbar war (p = 0,002). Bei allen Patienten mit MO nahm die Größe der MO-Zone über die Zeit ab (7,3 ± 8,9 % der LV-Muskelmasse 2 min p. i. vs. 2,4 ± 4,6 % 20 min p. i. p < 0,0001). Die ermittelten Infarktgrößen stiegen von 13,9 ± 13,5 % der LV-Muskelmasse 2 min p. i. auf 18,6 ± 14,2 % 10 min p. i. (p < 0,0001) und blieben danach unverändert (18,7 ± 14,3 % 20 min p. i.; p = 0,57). Schlussfolgerung: Unsere Studie belegt, dass die zeitliche Latenz zwischen KM-Gabe und Bildakquisition einen signifikanten Einfluss auf die abgrenzbare No-Reflow- und Infarktgröße hat.
Abstract
Purpose: Microvascular obstruction (MO) and the extent of infarction are important prognostic factors in acute myocardial infarction. Our study aimed to investigate the effect of the time interval between contrast administration and image acquisition on the quantification of microvascular obstruction and myocardial infarction. Materials and Methods: 50 consecutive patients with acute myocardial infarction (40 male, mean age 58.1 ± 11.7 years) treated by percutaneous coronary revascularization resulting in a grade 3 flow according to the thrombolysis in myocardial infarction flow classification were examined on a 1.5 T MR scanner within the first 5 days after infarction. 2, 5, 10, and 20 minutes after I.V. administration of 0.2 mmol/kg per kg body weight of Gadodiamid (OmniscanTM, GE Healthcare Buchler, Germany), a single shot IR-SSFP sequence (TR 2.4 ms, TE 1.08 ms, TI 180 – 280 ms, FA 50°) covering the entire left ventricle was acquired. Areas of MO and myocardial infarction were measured for all times after contrast injection (p. i.). Results: MO was detected in 32 of 50 patients two minutes p. i., while 23 patients showed evidence of MO (p = 0.002) 20 min. p. i. In all patients with MO, the extent of MO decreased over time (7.4 ± 9.0 % of the LV myocardium 2 min. p. i. vs. 2.4 ± 4.6 % 20 min. p. i. p < 0.0001). The area of myocardial infarction increased from 13.9 ± 13.5 % 2 min. p. i. to 18.6 ± 14.2 % 10 min. p. i. (p < 0.0001), and then remained unchanged (18.7 ± 14.3 % at 20 min. p = 0.57). Conclusion: Our study shows that the time delay between contrast media injection and image acquisition has a significant impact on the delimitable extent of MO and infarct size.
Key words
acute myocardial infarction - microvascular obstruction - no reflow - CMR - late enhancement
Literatur
- 1
Kloner R A, Ganote C E, Jennings R B.
The ”no-reflow” phenomenon after temporary coronary occlusion in the dog.
J Clin Invest.
1974;
54
1496-1508
MissingFormLabel
- 2
Ambrosio G, Weisman H F, Mannisi J A. et al .
Progressive impairment of regional myocardial perfusion after initial restoration
of postischemic blood flow.
Circulation.
1989;
80
1846-1861
MissingFormLabel
- 3
Wu K C, Zerhouni E A, Judd R M. et al .
Prognostic significance of microvascular obstruction by magnetic resonance imaging
in patients with acute myocardial infarction.
Circulation.
1998;
97
765-772
MissingFormLabel
- 4
Abbo K M, Dooris M, Glazier S. et al .
Features and outcome of no-reflow after percutaneous coronary intervention.
Am J Cardiol.
1995;
75
778-782
MissingFormLabel
- 5
Hombach V, Grebe O, Merkle N. et al .
Sequelae of acute myocardial infarction regarding cardiac structure and function and
their prognostic significance as assessed by magnetic resonance imaging.
Eur Heart J.
2005;
26
549-557
MissingFormLabel
- 6
Nijveldt R, Beek A M, Hirsch A. et al .
Functional recovery after acute myocardial infarction: comparison between angiography,
electrocardiography, and cardiovascular magnetic resonance measures of microvascular
injury.
J Am Coll Cardiol.
2008;
52
181-189
MissingFormLabel
- 7
Bruder O, Breuckmann F, Jensen C. et al .
Prognostic impact of contrast-enhanced CMR early after acute ST segment elevation
myocardial infarction (STEMI) in a regional STEMI network: results of the ”Herzinfarktverbund
Essen”.
Herz.
2008;
33
136-142
MissingFormLabel
- 8
Hunold P, Brandt-Mainz K, Freudenberg L. et al .
Myokardiale vitalitätsdiagnostik mit kontrastverstärkter Magnetresonanztomographie
– Vergleich des „late enhancement”-Konzepts mit der Positionen-Emissions-Tomographie.
Fortschr Röntgenstr.
2002;
174
867-873
MissingFormLabel
- 9
Wagner A, Mahrholdt H, Holly T A. et al .
Contrast-enhanced MRI and routine single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)
perfusion imaging for detection of subendocardial myocardial infarcts: an imaging
study.
Lancet.
2003;
361
374-379
MissingFormLabel
- 10
Kim R J, Wu E, Rafael A. et al .
The use of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging to identify reversible myocardial
dysfunction.
N Engl J Med.
2000;
343
1445-1453
MissingFormLabel
- 11
Beek A M, Kuhl H P, Bondarenko O. et al .
Delayed contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for the prediction of regional
functional improvement after acute myocardial infarction.
J Am Coll Cardiol.
2003;
42
895-901
MissingFormLabel
- 12
Wu K C, Kim R J, Bluemke D A. et al .
Quantification and time course of microvascular obstruction by contrast-enhanced echocardiography
and magnetic resonance imaging following acute myocardial infarction and reperfusion.
J Am Coll Cardiol.
1998;
32
1756-1764
MissingFormLabel
- 13
Lund G K, Stork A, Saeed M. et al .
Acute myocardial infarction: evaluation with first-pass enhancement and delayed enhancement
MR imaging compared with 201Tl SPECT imaging.
Radiology.
2004;
232
49-57
MissingFormLabel
- 14
Yan A T, Gibson C M, Larose E. et al .
Characterization of microvascular dysfunction after acute myocardial infarction by
cardiovascular magnetic resonance first-pass perfusion and late gadolinium enhancement
imaging.
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson.
2006;
8
831-837
MissingFormLabel
- 15
Lund G K, Stork A, Muellerleile K. et al .
Prediction of left ventricular remodeling and analysis of infarct resorption in patients
with reperfused myocardial infarcts by using contrast-enhanced MR imaging.
Radiology.
2007;
245
95-102
MissingFormLabel
- 16
Gerber B L, Rochitte C E, Melin J A. et al .
Microvascular obstruction and left ventricular remodeling early after acute myocardial
infarction.
Circulation.
2000;
101
2734-2741
MissingFormLabel
- 17
Gibson C M, Schomig A.
Coronary and myocardial angiography: angiographic assessment of both epicardial and
myocardial perfusion.
Circulation.
2004;
109
3096-3105
MissingFormLabel
- 18
Wu E, Ortiz J T, Tejedor P. et al .
Infarct size by contrast enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance is a stronger predictor
of outcomes than left ventricular ejection fraction or end-systolic volume index:
prospective cohort study.
Heart.
2008;
94
730-736
MissingFormLabel
- 19
Rehwald W G, Fieno D S, Chen E L. et al .
Myocardial magnetic resonance imaging contrast agent concentrations after reversible
and irreversible ischemic injury.
Circulation.
2002;
105
224-229
MissingFormLabel
- 20
Hunold P, Kreitner K F, Barkhausen J.
„Tot oder lebendig?”: Wie und warum myokardiale Vitalitätsdiagnostik mit MRT funktioniert.
Fortschr Röntgenstr.
2007;
179
1016-1024
MissingFormLabel
- 21
Manciet L H, Poole D C, McDonagh P F. et al .
Microvascular compression during myocardial ischemia: mechanistic basis for no-reflow
phenomenon.
Am J Physiol.
1994;
266
H1541-H1550
MissingFormLabel
- 22
Topol E J, Yadav J S.
Recognition of the importance of embolization in atherosclerotic vascular disease.
Circulation.
2000;
101
570-580
MissingFormLabel
- 23
Piana R N, Paik G Y, Moscucci M. et al .
Incidence and treatment of ‘no-reflow’ after percutaneous coronary intervention.
Circulation.
1994;
89
2514-2518
MissingFormLabel
- 24
Sievers B, Elliott M D, Hurwitz L M. et al .
Rapid detection of myocardial infarction by subsecond, free-breathing delayed contrast-enhancement
cardiovascular magnetic resonance.
Circulation.
2007;
115
236-244
MissingFormLabel
- 25
Choi S I, Jiang C Z, Lim K H. et al .
Application of breath-hold T 2-weighted, first-pass perfusion and gadolinium-enhanced
T 1-weighted MR imaging for assessment of myocardial viability in a pig model.
J Magn Reson Imaging.
2000;
11
476-480
MissingFormLabel
- 26
Saeed M, Lund G, Wendland M F. et al .
Magnetic resonance characterization of the peri-infarction zone of reperfused myocardial
infarction with necrosis-specific and extracellular nonspecific contrast media.
Circulation.
2001;
103
871-876
MissingFormLabel
- 27
Oshinski J N, Yang Z, Jones J R. et al .
Imaging time after Gd-DTPA injection is critical in using delayed enhancement to determine
infarct size accurately with magnetic resonance imaging.
Circulation.
2001;
104
2838-2842
MissingFormLabel
- 28
Wagner A, Mahrholdt H, Thomson L. et al .
Effects of time, dose, and inversion time for acute myocardial infarct size measurements
based on magnetic resonance imaging-delayed contrast enhancement.
J Am Coll Cardiol.
2006;
47
2027-2033
MissingFormLabel
- 29
Kim R J, Fieno D S, Parrish T B. et al .
Relationship of MRI delayed contrast enhancement to irreversible injury, infarct age,
and contractile function.
Circulation.
1999;
100
1992-2002
MissingFormLabel
- 30
Saeed M, Bremerich J, Wendland M F. et al .
Reperfused myocardial infarction as seen with use of necrosis-specific versus standard
extracellular MR contrast media in rats.
Radiology.
1999;
213
247-257
MissingFormLabel
- 31
Judd R M, Lugo-Olivieri C H, Arai M. et al .
Physiological basis of myocardial contrast enhancement in fast magnetic resonance
images of 2-day-old reperfused canine infarcts.
Circulation.
1995;
92
1902-1910
MissingFormLabel
- 32
Rochitte C E, Lima J A, Bluemke D A. et al .
Magnitude and time course of microvascular obstruction and tissue injury after acute
myocardial infarction.
Circulation.
1998;
98
1006-1014
MissingFormLabel
Dr. Kai Naßenstein
Institut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie und Neuroradiologie, Universitätsklinikum
Essen
Hufelandstraße 55
45122 Essen
Phone: + + 49/2 01/7 23 23 11
Fax: + + 49/2 01/7 23 15 48
Email: Kai.Nassenstein@uni-due.de