Introduction
Introduction
Chronic inflammation was identified as one of the predisposing factors for neoplastic
transformation by Rudolph Virchow over a century ago. Today, his hypothesis is supported
by accumulating epidemiological and clinical evidence. It is estimated that 15 % of
malignancies are associated with chronic inflammation as a result of persistent pathogen
infections [1 ]. Studies from our laboratory, as well as the findings of others, demonstrated that
nuclear factor-erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2) plays a crucial role in modulating
susceptibility to carcinogenesis in mouse models [2 ], [3 ], [4 ], [5 ], [6 ], [7 ], [8 ]. This review will focus on the role of chronic inflammation and the Nrf2 signaling
pathway in carcinogenesis and the feasibility of targeting inflammation and Nrf2 for
cancer chemoprevention. Isothiocyanates and curcumin will be used as examples of natural
phytochemicals that showed significant anti-inflammatory and cancer chemopreventive
effects in rodent and human trials.
Chronic Inflammation as a Risk Factor for Neoplastic Transformation
Chronic Inflammation as a Risk Factor for Neoplastic Transformation
Acute inflammation is part of the innate immunity required to maintain integrity of
the host when it is wounded by an infection, chemical or physical irritant [9 ]. Initiated by a cascade of cytokines and chemokines interactions, leukocytes and
other phagocytic cells infiltrate the wounded tissues followed by the generation of
oxidative stress [10 ]. Enhanced cell proliferation for tissue regeneration and other inflammatory responses
subside after the assaulting agent is removed, marking completion of the healing process.
However, neoplastic transformation may occur when the wounded tissues fail to heal
or the healing process is dysregulated [11 ]. It is believed that persistent inflammatory cell recruitment, repeated generation
of pro-inflammatory cytokines, reactive oxygen/nitrogen species, and continued proliferation
of genomically unstable cells contribute to neoplastic transformation and ultimately
result in tumor invasion and metastasis.
One of the most obvious causal relationships between chronic inflammation and cancer
is in colon carcinogenesis. Epidemiological studies have shown that individuals with
long-standing inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), such as ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s
disease have an increased lifetime risk of developing colorectal cancer [12 ], [13 ], [14 ]. While the infectious organism responsible for IBDs is yet to be identified, many
pathogenic infections have been linked with cancers. It is estimated that 90 % of
ulcers and 60 % of gastric adenocarcinomas are attributed to H. pylori infection [15 ]. Approximately 85 % of patients infected by H. pylori remain asymptomatic but in the remaining 15 % infection is associated with gastritis,
peptic ulcers and gastric adenocarcinoma [16 ], [17 ]. It has been shown that in patients with vacA cytotoxin-expressing H. pylori, infection is associated with a higher degree of inflammation and they are significantly
more likely to develop peptic ulcers or gastric cancer [18 ]. In fact, antibiotic therapy against H. pylori has been found to effectively prevent gastritis, peptic ulcers and ultimately gastric
cancer [19 ], [20 ], [21 ]. Accumulating epidemiological evidence links chronic HBV and HCV infection with
hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in humans [22 ], [23 ], [24 ], [25 ], [26 ]. It is believed that liver cancer is the consequence of a chronic process of active
hepatitis that produces a continuous stimulus of hepatic regeneration and cirrhosis
[27 ]. Likewise, increased risk for bladder cancer is associated with schistosomiasis
[28 ], [29 ], [30 ] and opisthorchiasis increases the risk of cholangiocarcinoma by more than five-fold
[31 ]. In addition to infections, environmental or chemical toxicants and physical irritants
may also trigger chronic inflammation leading to increase tumor risks ([Table 1 ]).
Table 1 Chronic inflammation-associated non-malignant diseases and malignancy
Etiological agents
Non-malignant disease
Malignancy
Environmental/Chemical irritants
Asbestos fibres, silica dusts
Asbestosis, silicosis (Grinder’s disease)
Mesothelioma, lung carcinoma
Cigarettes smoking
Bronchitis
Lung carcinoma
Alcohol
Pancreatitis, liver cirrhosis
Pancreatic carcinoma, hepatocellular carcinoma
Ultraviolet light
Skin inflammation
Melanoma
Gastric acids
Reflux esophagitis, Barrett’s esophagus
Esophageal carcinoma
Pathogen infections
Human papilloma virus 16 and 18 (HPV)
Genital warts/condyloma
Cervical cancer
Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)
Infectious mononucleosis
Nasopharyngeal carcinoma, Burkitt’s lymphoma, Hodgkin’s lymphoma
Hepatitis B and C virus (HBV, HCV)
Hepatitis, cirrhosis
Hepatocellular carcinoma
Human herpes 8 (HH8), human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)
AIDS
Kaposi’s sarcoma, squamous cell carcinoma, non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma
Liver flukes (Opisthorchis viverrini )
Opisthorchis, cholangitis
Cholangiosarcoma, colon carcinoma
Helicobacter pylori
Gastritis, peptic ulcers
Gastric carcinoma
Schistosoma haematobium
Schistosomiasis
Bladder carcinoma
Unidentified factor
Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs), Crohn’s disease, chronic ulcerative colitis
Colorectal carcinoma
Modified from refs. [78 ], [79 ], [80 ].
Nrf2 as an Important Modulator of Susceptibility to Carcinogenesis – Preclinical evidence
Nrf2 as an Important Modulator of Susceptibility to Carcinogenesis – Preclinical evidence
Nuclear factor-erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2) is a transcriptional factor that
plays a crucial role in cytoprotection against inflammation, as well as oxidative
and electrophilic stresses. Upon oxidative or electrophilic insults, Nrf2 will translocate
into the nucleus where it binds with antioxidant response elements, and transactivates
phase II detoxifying and antioxidant genes. Among the antioxidant genes that are regulated
by Nrf2 are NAD(P)H:quinone oxidoreductase (NQO1), heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1), thioredoxin
reductase 1, glutamate-cysteine ligase modifier subunit and glutamate-cysteine ligase
catalytic subunit [32 ]. Findings from our laboratory and others have demonstrated that Nrf2 is an important
modulator of susceptibility to carcinogen-induced carcinogenesis ([Table 2 ]). Using an azoxymethane-dextran sodium sulfate (AOM/DSS) colon carcinogenesis model,
we demonstrated that tumor incidence, multiplicity, size, and stage of progression
are increased in Nrf2 deficient mice [33 ]. Similarly, Osburn et al. in 2007 reported that Nrf2 ablation resulted in increased
colonic inflammatory injury and formation of aberrant crypt foci upon DSS treatment
[8 ]. We have also reported that Nrf2-deficient mice are more susceptible to 7,12-dimethylbenz[a ]anthracene (DMBA) and 12-O -tetradecanoylphorbol 13-acetate (TPA)-induced skin tumorigenesis [4 ]. In addition, accelerated DNA adduct formation and severe epithelial hyperplasia
induced by diesel exhaust exposure, increased gastric neoplasia induced by benzopyrene.
Increased incidences of N -nitrosobutyl(4-hydroxybutyl)amine (BBN)-induced urinary bladder carcinoma and hepatocarcinogenesis
induced by 2-amino-3-methylimidazo[4,5-f]quinoline were also reported in Nrf2-deficient
mice compared to their wild-type counterparts [2 ], [3 ], [6 ], [7 ]. Taken together, it is obvious that Nrf2 functions as a suppressor of tumorigenesis,
at least in preclinical animal models.
Table 2 Nrf2 as important modulator of tumor susceptibility in mouse models
Carcinogen
Outcomes*
Azoxymethane/dextran sulfate sodium (AOM/DSS)
Increased incidence, tumor multiplicity, and invasiveness of colon adenocarcinoma
Diesel exhaust particles
Increased DNA adduct formation and epithelial hyperplasia
Benzo[a ]pyrene (B[a]P)
Increased multiplicity of gastric carcinoma
7,12-Dimethylbenz[a ]anthracene/12-O -tetradecanoylphorbol 13-acetate (DMBA/TPA)
Increased multiplicity of skin papillomas
N -Nitrosobutyl-(4-hydroxybutyl)amine (BBN)
Increased incidence and invasiveness of bladder carcinoma
2-Amino-3-methylimidazo[4,5-f ]quinolone
Increased incidence and multiplicity of liver tumors.
Modified from ref. [81 ].
* As observed in Nrf2-deficient mice in comparison to their wild-type counterparts.
NF-κB Signaling and the Inflammatory Pathways
NF-κB Signaling and the Inflammatory Pathways
A key player in inflammatory processes is the transcription factor NF-κB (nuclear
factor-kappa-B) [34 ], which consists of a number of closely related protein dimers that bind a common
sequence motif [35 ]. Consisting of homo- and heterodimeric complexes formed from the Rel family of proteins,
Rel/NF-κB nuclear transcription factors have been found to play important roles in
cell proliferation, anti-apoptosis, and cancer development. The Rel protein family
consists of five proteins, named c-Rel, Rel A (p65), Rel B, NF-kB1 (p50/p105), and
NF-κB2 (p52/p100). NF-κB is activated by a wide variety of stimuli such as tumor necrosis
factor (TNF)-alpha, interleukin-1 (IL-1), LPS, UV light, and oxidative stress. In
most cell types, NF-κB is present in the cytosol in an inactive form and is associated
with its inhibitor proteins, called inhibitor of NF-κB (I-κBs). Of the many functional
domains in NF-κB proteins – the Rel homology domain (RHD), DNA binding domains, the
dimerization domain, and the nuclear localization signal (NLS) – I-κBs bind to the
RHD. Activation of NF-κB by extracellular stimuli leads to rapid phosphorylation,
ubiquitination, and proteolytic degradation of I-κB, thereby exposing the nuclear
localization signals on NF-κB and resulting in the nuclear translocation of the NF-κB
complex and phosphorylation of p65. The binding of NF-κB to a specific sequence in
the promoter region of a gene triggers the transcriptional activation of NF-κB-regulated
genes, including cyclin D1, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), Bcl-XL, COX-2,
and MMP-9, which are involved in a variety of cellular events, including tumor cell
proliferation, angiogenesis and metastasis [36 ]. Hence, NF-κB and the signaling pathways that mediate its activation have become
attractive targets for development of new chemopreventive and chemotherapeutic approaches
[34 ].
Cross-Talk between Inflammation and Nrf2 Signaling Pathway
Cross-Talk between Inflammation and Nrf2 Signaling Pathway
There is a growing body of evidence that the Nrf2 signaling pathway is closely involved
with the regulation of inflammation. We have recently shown that Nrf2-deficient mice
have increased susceptibility to DSS-induced colitis. In comparison with wild-type
mice, the colonic colitis observed in Nrf2 KO mice appeared to be more severe as demonstrated
by loss of colonic crypts, massive infiltration of inflammatory cells and anal bleeding.
In addition, immunocytochemical staining of nitrotyrosine, a biomarker of inflammation,
was more intense in Nrf2 KO mice. These observations in KO mice were associated with
a lower induction of phase II detoxifying genes/enzymes including HO-1, NAD(P)H-quinone
reductase-1 (NQO1), UDP-glucurosyltransferase 1A1 (UGT1A1), and glutathione S -transferase Mu-1 (GSTM1). Concomitantly, more intense induction of pro-inflammatory
biomarkers, such as interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-6 and TNFα, as well as pro-inflammatory
mediators like inducible nitric oxide synthetase (iNOS) and cyclooxygenase 2 (COX2),
was observed in Nrf2 KO mice [37 ]. It has been shown that Nrf2 protects against chemical-induced pulmonary injury
and inflammation [38 ], [39 ], whereas genetic ablation of Nrf2 enhances the susceptibility to cigarette smoke-induced
emphysema and to severe airway inflammation and asthma in mice [40 ], [41 ]. In addition, Nrf2 was found to be a crucial regulator of the innate immune response
and survival during experimental sepsis [42 ]. It is postulated that attenuation of inflammation through induction of anti-oxidative
enzymes and suppression of pro-inflammatory mediators in an Nrf2-dependent manner,
as demonstrated in these acute inflammation animal models, results in decreased sensitivity
of wild-type mice towards inflammatory oxidative damage. These studies show that the
Nrf2 signaling pathway is essential for protection of the host against inflammation
and inflammatory damage.
Despite all the findings in preclinical models suggesting that there is a possible
cross-talk between Nrf2 and inflammation, the underlying mechanisms are still elusive.
Liu et al. have recently provided an important insight, elucidating how pro-inflammatory
signaling can negatively regulate the Nrf2/ARE signaling pathway [43 ]. They found that NF-κB/p65 could antagonize this pathway through deprivation of
the coactivator, CREB binding protein (CBP) from Nrf2. They also hypothesized that
disruption of Nrf2-CBP interaction may restore the ability of CBP to recruit the corepressor,
histone deacetylases (HDACs) to ARE resulting in ARE repression [43 ]. Since in vivo data indicated that ablation of Nrf2 resulted in increased expression of pro-inflammatory
mediators like IL-1β, IL-6 and Cox-2, which are modulated by NF-κB, it will be interesting
to know if overexpression of Nrf2 can reverse the suppression effect of p65 leading
to suppression of the pro-inflammatory NF-κB signaling pathway. A previous study showed
that Nrf1 and Nrf2 can differentially modulate the expression of NF-κB and activator
protein-1 (AP-1) family members [44 ]. The question whether modulation of these pro-inflammatory mediators by Nrf2 is
a direct transcriptional regulation or indirect through its transactivated target
genes such as HO-1 and NQO-1 requires further investigation.
Cancer Chemoprevention by Targeting Inflammation and Nrf2 Signaling Pathway
Cancer Chemoprevention by Targeting Inflammation and Nrf2 Signaling Pathway
Some of the best evidence for a causal relationship between inflammation and neoplastic
transformation and progression comes from a study of cancer risk among long-term users
of aspirin and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Epidemiological studies
conducted on different populations with more than 13,000 cases, indicate that regular
aspirin use is associated with a reduction in the risk of colorectal cancer. The pooled
relative risk (RR) estimation was 0.59 (95 % CI: 0.54 – 0.64) from 11 case-control
studies, 0.85 (95 % CI: 0.78 – 0.92) from seven cohort ones, and 0.71 (95 % CI: 0.67
– 0.75) from all studies combined [45 ]. In addition, epidemiological studies also indicate that aspirin has a favorable
effect on cancers of the esophagus (RR = 0.72, 95 % CI: 0.62 – 0.84), stomach (RR = 0.84,
95 % CI: 0.76 – 0.93), breast (RR = 0.91, 95 % CI: 0.88 – 0.95), ovary (RR = 0.89,
95 % CI: 0.78 – 1.02) and lung (RR = 0.94, 95 % CI: 0.89 – 1.00) [45 ]. From the perspective of all these promising findings, the development of effective
chemoprevention with these drugs appears to be a real possibility. However, several
obstacles and challenges remain to be overcome. While the optimum doses and the duration
of treatment needed to achieve an effective chemopreventive effect remain unclear,
long-term consumption of these drugs is associated with adverse side effects. Therefore,
cancer chemoprevention using coxibs and NSAIDs may only be suitable for patients with
higher cancer risk.
Natural Phytochemicals as Promising Anti-Inflammatory and Anti-Neoplastic Agents
Natural Phytochemicals as Promising Anti-Inflammatory and Anti-Neoplastic Agents
Naturally occurring compounds with potent anti-inflammatory properties have been noted
as a plausible approach for clinical cancer prevention trials. In fact, dietary vegetables
and fruits have been regarded as rich sources of chemopreventive agents. Food phytochemicals
such as curcumin, EGCG, resveratrol, genistein and isothiocyanates, with strong anti-inflammatory
activity, have been shown to inhibit carcinogenesis in preclinical animal models.
Epidemiological studies have clearly documented that the frequent consumption of a
diet high in fruits and vegetables has been linked to a lower risk of many types of
cancers including prostate, colon, oral cavity, stomach, lung and esophagus [46 ], [47 ]. For example, several case-control and large prospective studies focusing on dietary
assessment suggest that the intake of isothiocyanates, tomatoes and tomato-based food
products may be associated with a lower risk of prostate cancer [48 ], [49 ], [50 ], [51 ], [52 ]. Furthermore, several studies reported that broccoli consumption could be linked
to a lowered risk of colon cancer and that watercress consumption can inhibit oxidative
metabolism of lung carcinogen NNK in humans, as reported in rodents [53 ]. In addition, intakes of yellow-orange and cruciferous vegetables were also inversely
related to prostate cancer, especially for advanced cases, with findings that were
generally consistent across ethnic groups and these results suggest that legumes (not
limited to soy products) and cruciferous vegetables may protect against prostate cancer.
Other nutritional epidemiological studies also provide support for the hypothesis
that high intakes of Brassica vegetables reduce prostate cancer risk [54 ], [55 ].
Isothiocyanates
Cruciferous vegetables, such as broccoli, Brussels sprouts, watercress, cabbage, kale,
cauliflower, kohlrabi and turnip, are rich sources of sulfur-containing compounds
called glucosinolates. Strong anticarcinogenic activities of cruciferous vegetables
have been attributed to the high abundance of isothiocyanates (ITCs), hydrolysis products
of glucosinolates. Isothiocyanates such as sulforaphane, phenethyl isothiocyanate
(PEITC), benzyl isothiocyanate (BITC) and allyl isothiocyanate (AITC) have been reported
to inhibit carcinogen-induced tumorigenesis in a variety of preclinical rodent models
[56 ], [57 ]. With over 115 naturally occurring glucosinolates identified to date, various cancer
chemopreventive mechanisms have been proposed for the ITCs. These include induction
of antioxidant and phase I/II detoxification genes through activation of Nrf2 (NF-E2
related factor 2) and AhR (arylhydrocarbon receptor), inhibition of pro-inflammatory
signaling pathways by suppression of NF-κB (nuclear factor-κB), inhibition of histone
deacetylase, as well as induction of cell cycle arrest and apoptosis. An excellent
review on the cancer chemopreventive actions of phytochemicals derived from glucosinolates
has been recently written by Hayes et al. [58 ]. As mentioned earlier, blocking chronic inflammation is an important step in the
prevention of cancers. Isothiocyanates have been found to exhibit anti-inflammatory
activity probably through inhibition of the NF-κB signaling pathway. Heiss et al.
reported that the anti-inflammatory effect of sulforaphane is elicited through the
inhibition of NF-κB and provided novel evidence that anti-inflammatory mechanisms
may contribute to sulforaphane-mediated cancer chemoprevention [59 ]. In vitro studies from our laboratory suggest that sulforaphane and PEITC inhibit the transcriptional
activity of NF-κB through the inhibition of phosphorylation of IκB, the inhibitor
of NF-κB [60 ]. Using HT-29 human colon cancer cell lines stably transfected with the NF-κB-luciferase-reporter
construct, we found that ITCs, including PEITC, AITC and sulforaphane substantially
inhibited lipopolysacharride (LPS)-induced NF-κB luciferase activity in a dose-dependent
manner [61 ]. We have recently reported that sulforaphane and dibenzoylmethane, given alone or
in combination, inhibit familial adenomatous polyposis in APCmin/+ mice [62 ]. Both sulforaphane and DBM treatments resulted in decreased levels of pro-inflammatory
prostaglandin E2 or leukotriene B4 in intestinal polyps or apparently normal mucosa.
In addition, winter cress (Barbarea verna ) seed preparations rich in phenethyl isothiocyanate (PEITC) showed strong in vivo anti-inflammatory activity by significantly reducing the size of carrageenan-induced
rat paw edema. The seed preparations were found to be able to reduce the mRNA levels
of inflammation-related genes such as COX-2, iNOS and the pro-inflammatory cytokine
interleukin in LPS-stimulated mouse macrophage cell line RAW 264.7 [63 ]. These studies indicate that ITCs are potent anti-inflammatory agents and the inhibition
of inflammation by ITCs may contribute to their overall cancer chemopreventive effects.
Previous studies from our laboratory as well as others have demonstrated that the
induction of anti-oxidant/phase II detoxification through activation of Nrf2 signaling
is a crucial mechanism for many phytochemicals to block cancers. We have recently
reported that inhibition of 7,12-dimethylbenz[a ]anthracene-induced skin tumorigenesis in C57BL/6 mice by sulforaphane is mediated
by Nrf2 [4 ]. Similarly, inhibition of benzo[a ]pyrene-induced forestomach tumor by oltipraz and sulforaphane and inhibition of urinary
bladder carcinogenesis by oltipraz were all found to be Nrf2-dependent [3 ], [6 ], [64 ], [65 ]. Recently, Kensler et al. initiated a human clinical trial to investigate the effect
of a glucosinolate-rich broccoli sprout hot water extract on the genotoxicity of aflatoxin
and found a significant inverse relationship between sulforaphane elimination and
urinary aflatoxin-DNA adduct excretion in individual participants [66 ]. This finding demonstrated that, in humans, sulforaphane may prevent the carcinogenic
potential of aflatoxin exposure by modulating its metabolism, potentially through
an Nrf2-mediated mechanism.
Curcumin
Curcumin (CUR, a beta-diketone), a constituent of turmeric curry powder, possesses
potent anti-inflammatory activity and prevents cancer in many animal models [67 ], [68 ], [69 ], [70 ], [71 ]. CUR is a potent inhibitor of TPA-induced ornithine decarboxylase activity and inflammation
in mouse skin [69 ]. CUR is also a potent inhibitor of arachidonic acid-induced inflammation in vivo in mouse skin, and inhibits epidermal lipoxygenase and cyclooxygenase activity in vitro [69 ]. CUR inhibits COX2 induction by the tumor promoters, and TNFα. The induction of
COX2 by inflammatory cytokines or hypoxia-induced oxidative stress can be mediated
by NF-κB. Since CUR inhibits NF-κB activation, Plummer et al. examined whether its
chemopreventive activity is related to modulation of the signaling pathway that regulates
the stability of the NF-kappaB-sequestering protein, IκB [72 ]. Recently components of this pathway, NF-κB-inducing kinase and IκB kinases IKKalpha
and beta, which phosphorylate IκB to release NF-κB, have been characterized. CUR prevents
phosphorylation of IκB by inhibiting the activity of the IKKs. We have found that
CUR potently inhibited phosphorylation of EGFR, PI3K, AKT, IKK-alpha and NF-κB activities
in human prostate PC-3 cells [73 ], inhibition of NF-κB activities in human colon HT-29 cells [61 ] and that inhibition of Akt and NF-κB signaling pathways could contribute to the
inhibition of cell proliferation and induction of apoptosis in the PC-3 prostate tumor
xenografts in nude mice. Dietary administration of 2 % CUR also caused a marked increase
in apoptosis, and a significant decrease in angiogenesis in nude mice treated with
LNCap prostate cancer cells [74 ]. Similarly, dietary administration of 2 % CUR effectively inhibited azoxymethane
(AOM)-induced colon tumors in male F344 rats and prevented tumors in C57BL/6J-Apc
Min/+ mice. CUR was also reported to inhibit AOM-induced rat colon carcinogenesis
by suppression of prostaglandin (PG) and thromboxane (Tx) formation [75 ].
Similar to isothiocyanates, CUR is a strong activator of Nrf2-mediated transcription
of ARE-luciferase reporter gene, as well as an inducer of endogenous Nrf2 protein
and one of the Nrf2-mediated detoxifying/antioxidant enzyme HO-1 in human cells [76 ]. Using Affymetrix microarray analysis on the gene expression profiles induced by
CUR in Nrf2(+/+), but not in Nrf2(−/−), our results indicated that, in addition to
the classical Nrf2-mediated detoxifying and antioxidant cellular defense genes, other
genes including transporters, kinases/phophatases, those involved in ubiquitination
and proteolysis, electron transport, apoptosis and cell cycle control, cell adhesion
and transcription factors also require Nrf2 for their induction by dietary cancer
chemopreventive compounds including CUR [76 ]. All these properties, together with a long history of consumption without adverse
health effects, make CUR an important candidate for consideration in human cancer
prevention.
Conclusion
Conclusion
Given that chronic inflammation has been linked with almost 20 % of all human malignancies
[77 ], Nrf2 signaling is important in the defense of acute inflammation, both inflammation
and Nrf2 seem to be plausible targets for cancer chemoprevention. [Fig. 1 ] summarizes the involvement and the possible cross-talk between Nrf2 and inflammatory
signaling pathways. Concomitant induction of the Nrf2 signaling pathway and inhibition
of inflammation is thought to be a crucial mechanism by which these phytochemicals
exhibit their cancer chemopreventive effect. Combinations of sub-optimal doses of
coxibs and NSAIDs such as celexocib and sulindac with relatively non-toxic natural
phytochemicals such as CUR, isothiocyanates and EGCG have been proven to be able to
synergistically inhibit carcinogenesis in rodent models ([Table 3 ]). In addition to ongoing trials involving single phytochemicals with multiple activities,
these combinational approaches certainly warrant further consideration in clinical
human trials.
Fig. 1 Overall schematic of possible cross-talk between Nrf2 and inflammatory signaling pathways
in cancer promotion and progression. Excessive oxidative stress coupled with prolonged
inflammatory response (probably through activation of NF-κB signaling pathways) leads
to cancer promotion and progression. Natural phytochemicals such as CUR and isothiocyanates
activate Nrf2-mediated antioxidant enzymes (leading to decreased oxidative stress/inflammation
and cell growth) and inhibit the NF-κB-mediated inflammatory pathway (leading to decreased
inflammation and cell growth) resulting in protection against inflammation and cancer.
Red arrow: activation; Blue line: inhibition; Dotted blue line: presumed inhibition;
Black dotted arrow: transcriptional activation
Table 3 Synergistic inhibitory effect of coxibs and NSAIDs and food phytochemicals combination
against carcinogenesis in rodent models
Drugs/compounds (Dose)
Model
Outcome
Ref.
Curcumin (0.6 %), Celecoxib (0.16 %),
2,3-Dimethylhydrazine (DMH)-induced colon cancer in rat
↓ 39 %, ↓ 26.5 % and ↓ 62 % for curcumin, celecoxib, and combination, respectively.
[82 ]
Green tea polyphenol (GTP) (0.1 %), celecoxib (10 mg/kg i. p. 5 days/week)
CWR22Rv1 xenografts in nude mice
↓ 42 %, ↓ 57 % and ↓ 81 % for GTP, celecoxib alone and combination, respectively
[83 ]
alpha-Tocopherol ether-linked acetic acid analogue (α-TEA) (72 mg/day aerosol inhalation),
celecoxib (500 ppm)
Ultraviolet-induced skin cancers in mice
↓ tumor numbers in all treatment group but continuous combination treatment resulted
in the lowest total number of tumor
[84 ]
(72 mg/day aerosol inhalation), celecoxib (500 mg/kg and 1 250 mg/kg diet)
MDA-MB-435-FL-GFP human cancer xenografts in nude mice
↓ mean tumor volume in all treatment group; inhibitory effect significantly stronger
in combination of α-TEA + celecoxib (1 250) group than single compound/drug
[85 ]
Fructo-oligosaccharide (6 %), celecoxib 1 500 ppm
AOM-induced aberrant crypt foci (ACF) in rat
↓ 61 % in combination; no effect with celecoxib alone
[86 ]
Anthocyanin-rich tart cherry extract (375, 750, 1 500, 3 000 mg/kg diet), sulindac
(100 mg/kg diet)
APCmin/+ mice
Anthocyanin-rich extract + sulindac had fewer and smaller total tumor burden compared
with sulindac alone
[87 ]
EGCG (0.01 %), sulindac 10 mg/kg bw, p. o. , 3 times/week
AOM-induced colon cancer in rat
↓ 54 %, ↓58 % and ↓78 % for EGCG, sulindac alone and combination, respectively.
[88 ]
Green tea extract (0.1 %), sulindac (0.03 %)
APCmin/+
↓ 27 %, ↓ 32 % and ↓ 55.5 % for Green tea extract, sulindac alone and combination,
respectively.
[89 ]
Acknowledgements
Acknowledgements
We thank all the members of Ah Ng Tony Kong’s laboratory for their helpful discussions.
This study was supported in part by Institutional Funds and by RO1-CA094828, RO1-CA073674
and R01-CA118947 to Dr Ah-Ng Tony Kong from the National Institutes of Health (NIH).