Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/a-2751-8780
An Algorithmic Approach to Arterial Coupler Use in Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction: Comparison with Hand-Sewn Sutures
Authors
Abstract
Background
Microsurgical breast reconstruction offers superior outcomes after mastectomy, but vascular microanastomosis remains technically demanding. Venous couplers are widely adopted, whereas the use of arterial couplers remains controversial. This study aimed to establish an algorithmic approach for arterial coupler use and compare outcomes with hand-sewn sutures.
Methods
A retrospective review was performed on 105 patients undergoing deep inferior epigastric perforator flap breast reconstruction by a single surgeon. Patients were divided into an arterial coupler group (n = 62) and a hand-sewn suture group (n = 43). An intraoperative algorithm guided coupler use, requiring the absence of atherosclerosis, intact intima, and adequate vessel laxity. Demographics, operative details, microanastomosis time, and postoperative outcomes were analyzed.
Results
Patients in the coupler group were younger (47.6 ± 8.6 vs. 53.0 ± 7.9 years, p = 0.001) and underwent more robot-assisted procedures (16.1% vs. 2.3%, p = 0.025). Microanastomosis time was significantly shorter with couplers (19.6 ± 8.9 vs. 26.1 ± 6.5 minutes, p < 0.01). Flap survival was comparable between groups (96.8% vs. 100%, p = 0.512). Complication rates, including arterial/venous insufficiency, hematoma, and infection, showed no significant differences. Two coupler failures occurred: One venous congestion and one late thrombosis, both attributed to multifactorial causes rather than device failure.
Conclusion
Arterial couplers, when used under strict algorithmic selection criteria, provide reliable outcomes comparable to hand-sewn sutures while significantly reducing operative time. This approach enhances efficiency in microsurgical breast reconstruction and may guide future standardized practice.
Publication History
Received: 04 September 2025
Accepted: 19 November 2025
Accepted Manuscript online:
24 November 2025
Article published online:
12 December 2025
© 2025. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA
-
References
- 1 Chang DW. Breast reconstruction with microvascular MS-TRAM and DIEP flaps. Arch Plast Surg 2012; 39 (01) 3-10
- 2 Panchal H, Matros E. Current trends in postmastectomy breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2017; 140 (5S Advances in Breast Reconstruction): 7S-13S
- 3 Nahabedian MY, Momen B, Galdino G, Manson PN. Breast Reconstruction with the free TRAM or DIEP flap: Patient selection, choice of flap, and outcome. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002; 110 (02) 466-475 , discussion 476–477
- 4 Tamai S. History of microsurgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009; 124 (6 Suppl): e282-e294
- 5 Allen RJ, Treece P. Deep inferior epigastric perforator flap for breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 1994; 32 (01) 32-38
- 6 Pafitanis G, Nicolaides M, O'Connor EF. et al. Microvascular anastomotic arterial coupling: A systematic review. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2021; 74 (06) 1286-1302
- 7 Spector JA, Draper LB, Levine JP, Ahn CY. Routine use of microvascular coupling device for arterial anastomosis in breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 2006; 56 (04) 365-368
- 8 Geierlehner A, Rodi T, Mosahebi A, Tanos G, Wormald JCR. Meta-analysis of venous anastomosis techniques in free flap reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2020; 73 (03) 409-420
- 9 Fitzgerald O'Connor E, Rozen WM, Chowdhry M. et al. The microvascular anastomotic coupler for venous anastomoses in free flap breast reconstruction improves outcomes. Gland Surg 2016; 5 (02) 88-92
- 10 Sando IC, Plott JS, McCracken BM. et al. Simplifying arterial coupling in microsurgery-a preclinical assessment of an everter device to aid with arterial anastomosis. J Reconstr Microsurg 2018; 34 (06) 420-427
- 11 Broer PN, Weichman KE, Tanna N. et al. Venous coupler size in autologous breast reconstruction–does it matter?. Microsurgery 2013; 33 (07) 514-518
- 12 Scaglioni MF, Meroni M. The use of arterial coupler for small size perforator-to-perforator microvascular anastomosis. Microsurgery 2023; 43 (06) 643-644
- 13 Head LK, McKay DR. Economic comparison of hand-sutured and coupler-assisted microvascular anastomoses. J Reconstr Microsurg 2018; 34 (01) 71-76
- 14 Kim HB, Min JC, Lee SB. et al. Conventional versus robot-assisted immediate breast reconstruction: Reconstructive outcome and patient-reported outcome measures. Plast Reconstr Surg 2024; 154 (4S): 3S-12S
- 15 Lohasammakul S, Lee SJ, Suppasilp C. et al. A clinical application for arterial coupling and histomorphometric comparison of internal mammary and thoracodorsal arteries for safe use. Microsurgery 2024; 44 (06) e31214
