Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/a-2655-3468
Feasibility of Early Activation of a Cochlear Implant: Study of Electrophysiology, Audiometry, and Patient Satisfaction Data

Abstract
Objective
The objective of this study is to determine the feasibility of early activation of a cochlear implant in terms of both effectiveness and safety.
Materials and Methods
We conducted a retrospective study on a series of patients who had cochlear implant surgery between April 2018 and June 2023. In the early activation group (EA) 25 patients were included, with activation performed on days 0 to 1 post-implantation, and 14 patients were included in the control group (C), who underwent traditional activation between days 15 and 35 post-implantation. Impedance values, speech intelligibility thresholds at 60 dB, and processor usage time in each group were recorded at activation and on days 30, 60, and 90 post-implantations. The EA group also underwent a prospective satisfaction assessment.
Results
We did not observe any statistically significant differences between the two groups regarding medium-term impedance evolution, speech intelligibility, or processor usage time. A significant improvement in satisfaction results was noted in the EA group. No complications related to early activation were observed.
Conclusion
Based on our study results, early activation of a cochlear implant is a reliable technique that improves patient satisfaction without affecting electrophysiological and audiological outcomes or increasing the risk of complications.
Publication History
Received: 23 February 2025
Accepted: 12 July 2025
Article published online:
25 July 2025
© 2025. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
-
References
- 1 Farinetti A, Ben Gharbia D, Mancini J, Roman S, Nicollas R, Triglia JM. Cochlear implant complications in 403 patients: comparative study of adults and children and review of the literature. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis 2014; 131 (03) 177-182
- 2 Schraivogel S, Aebischer P, Wagner F. et al. Postoperative impedance-based estimation of cochlear implant electrode insertion depth. Ear Hear 2023; 44 (06) 1379-1388
- 3 Caswell-Midwinter B, Doney EM, Arjmandi MK, Jahn KN, Herrmann BS, Arenberg JG. The relationship between impedance, programming and word recognition in a large clinical dataset of cochlear implant recipients. Trends Hear 2022 ;26:23312165211060983
- 4 Pisa JFD, Almutairi WH, Mackie K, Stangherlin D, Sulkers J, Hochman JB. Impedance change as an indicator of cochlear implant failure. Otol Neurotol 2023; 44 (04) e211-e215
- 5 Gibson WP, Harrison HC, Prowse C. A new incision for placement of cochlear implants. J Laryngol Otol 1995; 109 (09) 821-825
- 6 Eshraghi AA, Gupta C, Ozdamar O, Balkany TJ, Truy E, Nazarian R. Biomedical engineering principles of modern cochlear implants and recent surgical innovations. Anat Rec (Hoboken) 2012; 295 (11) 1957-1966
- 7 Alzoubi F, Odat H, Al Omari A, Al-Zuraiqi B. The outcome of our modified double-flap technique for cochlear implantation: a case series of 342 consecutive patients. Cochlear Implants Int 2015; 16 (02) 95-99
- 8 Haute Autorité de Santé [Internet]. Le traitement de la surdité par implants cochléaires ou du tronc cérébral - Fiche BUTS - Actualisation Janvier 2012. . Accessed October 2, 2024 at: https://www.has-sante.fr/jcms/r_1438002/fr/le-traitement-de-la-surdite-par-implants-cochleaires-ou-du-tronc-cerebral-fiche-buts-actualisation-janvier-2012
- 9 Légifrance - Publications officielles - Journal officiel - JORF n° 0209 du 08/09/2021 [Internet]. Accessed October 2, 2024 at: https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/download/pdf?id=npgsx5QQKv5CYbImeuZH3zZ6S-6eklShqLs7Cz53Jf8=
- 10 Cox RM, Alexander GC. The abbreviated profile of hearing aid benefit. Ear Hear 1995; 16 (02) 176-186
- 11 Robinson K, Gatehouse S, Browning GG. Measuring patient benefit from otorhinolaryngological surgery and therapy. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1996; 105 (06) 415-422
- 12 Enquête CISIC. 2012 « L'implant cochléaire au quotidien» [Internet]. Accessed September 11, 2024 at: https://www.cisic.fr/publications/enquete-cisic-2012-l-implant-cochleaire-au-quotidien
- 13 Roux-Vaillard S, Pineau A, Laccourreye L, Boucher S. Immediate activation after cochlear implantation: preliminary study. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis 2020; 137 (01) 17-20
- 14 Alsabellha RM, Hagr A, Al-Momani MO, Garadat SN. Cochlear implant device activation and programming: 5 days postimplantation. Otol Neurotol 2014; 35 (04) e130-e134
- 15 Alshalan A, Abdelsamad Y, Yousef M, Alahmadi A, Almuhawas F, Hagr A. Early activation after cochlear implantation: a systematic review. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2023; 280 (08) 3489-3502
- 16 Günther S, Baumann U, Stöver T. Early fitting in cochlear implantation: benefits and limits. Otol Neurotol 2018; 39 (04) e250-e256
- 17 Hagr A, Garadat SN, Al-Momani M, Alsabellha RM, Almuhawas FA. Feasibility of one-day activation in cochlear implant recipients. Int J Audiol 2015; 54 (05) 323-328
- 18 Sun CH, Chang CJ, Hsu CJ, Wu HP. Feasibility of early activation after cochlear implantation. Clin Otolaryngol 2019; 44 (06) 1004-1010
- 19 Hajr EA, Almuhawas F. Financial benefits of the early fitting of a cochlear implant speech processor: assessment of the direct cost. Cureus 2019; 11 (09) e5684