Semin Speech Lang
DOI: 10.1055/a-2626-3292
Research Article: Pediatric

Understanding How Dialect Differences Shape How AAE-Speaking Children Process Sentences in Real-Time

1   Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, College Park, Maryland
,
Yi Ting Huang
1   Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, College Park, Maryland
2   Program in Neuroscience and Cognitive Science, University of Maryland, College Park, College Park, Maryland
3   Maryland Language Science Center, University of Maryland, College Park, College Park, Maryland
,
Jan Edwards
1   Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, College Park, Maryland
3   Maryland Language Science Center, University of Maryland, College Park, College Park, Maryland
› Author Affiliations

Funding A.S.B. reports support for this study from the Institute of Education Sciences (R2054170139), National Science Foundation (NSF #1449815 and NSF #2234811), and American Speech Hearing Foundation.
Preview

Abstract

Dialect differences between African American English (AAE) and Mainstream American English (MAE) impact how children comprehend sentences. However, research on real-time sentence processing has the potential to reveal the underlying causes of these differences. This study used eye tracking, which measures how children interpret linguistic features as a sentence unfolds, and examined how AAE- and MAE-speaking children processed “was” and “were,” a morphology feature produced differently in MAE and AAE. Fifty-nine participants, ages 7;8 to 11;0 years, completed standardized measures of dialect density and receptive vocabulary. In the eye tracking task, participants heard sentences in MAE with either unambiguous (e.g., “Jeremiah”) or ambiguous (e.g., “Carolyn May”), subjects and eye movements were measured to singular (image of one person) or plural referents (image of two people). After the onset of the auxiliary verb, AAE-speaking children were sensitive to “was” and “were” when processing sentences but were less likely than MAE-speaking children to use “was” as a basis for updating initial predictions of plural referents. Among African American children, dialect density was predictive of sensitivity to “was” when processing sentences. Results suggest that linguistic mismatch impacts how contrastive verb morphology is used to update initial interpretations of MAE sentences.

Supplementary Material



Publication History

Article published online:
02 July 2025

© 2025. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 
  • References

  • Allen, M., Badecker, W., & Osterhout, L. (2003). Morphological analysis in sentence processing: an ERP study. Language and Cognitive Processes, 18(4), 405–430
  • Barker, B. A., & Meyer, L. M. (2015). Influence of foreign accent on preschoolers' word recognition and story comprehension. Applied Psycholinguistics, 36, 1111–1132
  • Bates, E., & MacWhinney, B. (1989). Functionalism and the competition model. The crosslinguistic study of sentence processing, 3, 73–112
  • Bent, T. (2014). Children's perception of foreign-accented words. Journal of Child Language, 41, 1334–1355
  • Berman, J. M., Graham, S. A., Callaway, D., & Chambers, C. G. (2013). Preschoolers use emotion in speech to learn new words. Child Development, 84(5), 1791–1805
  • Beyer, T., Edwards, K. A., & Fuller, C. C. (2015). Misinterpretation of African American English bin by adult speakers of standard American English. Language & Communication, 45, 59–69
  • Beyer, T., Edwards, K. A., & Fuller, C. C. (2015). Misinterpretation of African American English bin by adult speakers of standard American English. Language & Communication, 45, 59–69
  • Beyer, T., & Hudson Kam, C. L. (2012). First and second graders' interpretation of Standard American English morphology across varieties of English. First Language, 32(3), 365–384
  • Bortolini, U., Arfé, B., Caselli, C. M., Degasperi, L., Deevy, P., & Leonard, L. B. (2006). Clinical markers for specific language impairment in Italian: the contribution of clitics and non-word repetition. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 41(6), 695–712
  • Bühler, J. C. (2017). Neural mechanisms of linguistic mismatch in adults and children based on dialect familiarity and the impact of speaking Swiss German dialect on early reading and spelling acquisition (Doctoral dissertation, University of Zurich)
  • Byrd, A. S., Huang, Y. T., & Edwards, J. (2023). The impact of dialect differences on spoken language comprehension. Applied Psycholinguistics, 44(4), 610–633
  • Booth, P., Clenton, J., & Van Herwegen, J. (2020). L1–L2 semantic and syntactic processing: The influence of language proximity. In First Language Influences on Multilingual Lexicons (pp. 35–52). Routledge
  • Charity, A. H., Scarborough, H. S., & Griffin, D. M. (2004). Familiarity with school English in African American children and its relation to early reading achievement. Child Development, 75(5), 1340–1356
  • Craig, H. K., & Washington, J. A. (2004). Grade-related changes in the production of African American English. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research: JSLHR, 47(2), 450–463
  • De Villiers, J. G., & Johnson, V. E. (2007). The information in third-person /s/: acquisition across dialects of American English. Journal of Child Language, 34(1), 133–158
  • Dunn, D. M. (2019). Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test (5th ed.) [Measurement instrument]. Bloomington, MN: NCS Pearson
  • Edwards, J., Gross, M., Chen, J., MacDonald, M. C., Kaplan, D., Brown, M., & Seidenberg, M. S. (2014). Dialect awareness and lexical comprehension of mainstream American English in African American English-speaking children. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research: JSLHR, 57(5), 1883–1895
  • Erskine, M. E. (2023). Isolating Effects of Perceptual Analysis and Sociocultural Context on Children's Comprehension of Two Dialects of English, African American English and General American English (Doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland, College Park)
  • Farris-Trimble, A., & McMurray, B. (2013). Test-retest reliability of eye tracking in the visual world paradigm for the study of real-time spoken word recognition. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research: JSLHR, 56(4), 1328–1345
  • Garcia, F. M., Shen, G., Avery, T., Green, H. L., Godoy, P., Khamis, R., & Froud, K. (2022). Bidialectal and monodialectal differences in morphosyntactic processing of AAE and MAE: evidence from ERPs and acceptability judgments. Journal of Communication Disorders, 100, 106267
  • Gatlin, B., & Wanzek, J. (2015). Relations among children's use of dialect and literacy skills: a meta-analysis. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research: JSLHR, 58(4), 1306–1318
  • Green, L. J. (2002). African American English: a linguistic introduction. Cambridge University Press
  • Green, L. J., & Sistrunk, W. (2015). Syntax and Semantics in African American English. In The Oxford Handbook of African American Language
  • Harte, J., Oliveira, A., Frizelle, P., & Gibbon, F. (2016). Children's comprehension of an unfamiliar speaker accent: a review. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 51, 221–235
  • Huang, Y. T., & Snedeker, J. (2018). Some inferences still take time: prosody, predictability, and the speed of scalar implicatures. Cognitive Psychology, 102, 105–126
  • Huang, Y. T., Zheng, X., Meng, X., & Snedeker, J. (2013). Children's assignment of grammatical roles in the online processing of Mandarin passive sentences. Journal of Memory and Language, 69(4), 589–606
  • Isbilen, E. S., & Christiansen, M. H. (2022). Statistical learning of language: a meta-analysis into 25 years of research. Cognitive Science, 46(9), e13198
  • Knowlton, T., & Gomes, V. (2022). Linguistic and non-linguistic cues to acquiring the strong distributivity of each. Proceedings of the Linguistic Society of America, 7(1), 5236–5236
  • King, J. P. J. (2019). Beyond words: non-linguistic signals and the recovery of meaning
  • Kouider, S., Halberda, J., Wood, J., & Carey, S. (2006). Acquisition of English number marking: the singular-plural distinction. Language Learning and Development, 2(1), 1–25
  • Leonard, L. B. (2014). Children with specific language impairment. MIT Press
  • Leonard, L. B., Eyer, J. A., Bedore, L. M., & Grela, B. G. (1997). Three accounts of the grammatical morpheme difficulties of English-speaking children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research: JSLHR, 40(4), 741–753
  • Lukyanenko, C., & Fisher, C. (2016). Where are the cookies? Two- and three-year-olds use number-marked verbs to anticipate upcoming nouns. Cognition, 146, 349–370
  • MacWhinney, B., Bates, E., & Kliegl, R. (1984). Cue validity and sentence interpretation in English, German, and Italian. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 23(2), 127–150
  • Marslen-Wilson, W. D., & Tyler, L. K. (2007). Morphology, language and the brain: the decompositional substrate for language comprehension. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 362(1481), 823–836
  • Martin, I. A., Goupell, M. J., & Huang, Y. T. (2022). Children's syntactic parsing and sentence comprehension with a degraded auditory signal. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 151(2), 699
  • Newkirk-Turner, B. L., Oetting, J. B., & Stockman, I. J. (2014). BE, DO, and modal auxiliaries of 3-year-old African American English speakers. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research: JSLHR, 57(4), 1383–1393
  • Newkirk-Turner, B. L., & Green, L. (2016). Third person singular-s and event marking in child African American English. Linguistic Variation, 16(1), 103-130
  • Pearson, B. Z., Conner, T., & Jackson, J. E. (2013). Removing obstacles for African American English-speaking children through greater understanding of language difference. Developmental Psychology, 49(1), 31–44
  • Porretta, V., Kyröläinen, A., van Rij, J., & Järvikivi, J. (2016). "VWPre: Tools for Preprocessing Visual World Data." Version 1.2.4, updated 2020–11–28, https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=VWPre
  • Roberts, L. (2012). Individual differences in second language sentence processing. Language Learning, 62, 172–188
  • Saiegh-Haddad, E., Laks, L., & McBride, C. (2022). Handbook of literacy in diglossia and in dialectal contexts. Springer, 1007, 978–983
  • Seymour, H. N., Roeper, T., de Villiers, J., & de Villiers, P. A. (2003). Diagnostic Evaluation of Language Variation: Screen-ing Test (DELV-ST). The Psychological Corporation
  • Spivey, M. J., Tanenhaus, M. K., Eberhard, K. M., & Sedivy, J. C. (2002). Eye movements and spoken language comprehension: effects of visual context on syntactic ambiguity resolution. Cognitive Psychology, 45(4), 447–481
  • Terry, N. P., & McDonald Connor, C. (2012). Changing nonmainstream American English use and early reading achievement from kindergarten to first grade. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 21(1), 78–86
  • Terry, N. P., Connor, C. M., Petscher, Y., & Conlin, C. R. (2012). Dialect variation and reading: is change in nonmainstream American English use related to reading achievement in first and second grades? Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research: JSLHR, 55(1), 55–69
  • Terry, N. P., Gatlin, B., & Johnson, L. (2018). Same or different: how bilingual readers can help us understand bidialectal readers. Topics in Language Disorders, 38(1), 50–65
  • Terry, J. M., Thomas, E. R., Jackson, S. C., & Hirotani, M. (2022). African American English speaking 2nd graders, verbal-s, and educational achievement: event related potential and math study findings. PLoS One, 17(10), e0273926
  • Trueswell, J. C., Sekerina, I., Hill, N. M., & Logrip, M. L. (1999). The kindergarten-path effect: studying on-line sentence processing in young children. Cognition, 73(2), 89–134
  • Van den Bos, E., Christiansen, M. H., & Misyak, J. B. (2012). Statistical learning of probabilistic nonadjacent dependencies by multiple-cue integration. Journal of Memory and Language, 67(4), 507–520
  • Washington, J. A., & Craig, H. K. (2002). Morphosyntactic forms of African American English used by young children and their caregivers. Applied Psycholinguistics, 23(2), 209–231
  • Weatherhead, D., & White, K. S. (2021). Toddlers link social and speech variation during word learning. Developmental Psychology, 57(8), 1195
  • Weissler, R. E., & Brennan, J. R. (2020). How do listeners form grammatical expectations to African American Language?
  • Wood, J. N., Kouider, S., & Carey, S. (2009). Acquisition of singular-plural morphology. Developmental Psychology, 45(1), 202–206
  • Yu, C., & Ballard, D. H. (2007). A unified model of early word learning: integrating statistical and social cues. Neurocomputing, 70(13–15), 2149–2165