Comparison of predictive performances of pneumonia scores, qSOFA and 4C mortality score in patients hospitalized for COVID-19: a retrospective study

Abstract

Introduction

Several scores have been validated for predicting mortality in community-acquired pneumonia (CRB-65, CURB-65, PSI), sepsis (qSOFA) and COVID-19 (4C Mortality Score). However, performances of theses scores in pneumonia and COVID-19 as well as the impact of Omicron as predominating virus mutation on prediction performances remained to be determined.

Methods

In this single-center retrospective study, the prognostic value of different scores in the periods pre-omicron (03/20–12/2021) were compared to those of the omicron period (01/2022–03/2023) in patients hospitalized for COVID-19.

Results

Of 622 study patients, 348 (56.2%) had pneumonia. Mortality was 16.2% (101 patients), with a significant difference between periods (71 (23.1%) versus 30 (9.5%), p<0.001). In patients with pneumonia, predictive performance of PSI was significantly better compared to CRB-65, CURB-65 and qSOFA (differences between AUCs PSI vs CRB-65 0.066 (95% CI 0.02–0.11, p=0.006); PSI vs CURB-65 0.047 (95% CI 0–0.09, p=0.042); PSI vs qSOFA 0.124 (95% CI 0.05–0.2, p=0.001) but not when compared to the 4C Mortality Score. There was no difference in predictive performances between periods for any score, also after excluding patients with treatment restrictions.

Conclusions

All scores had good predictive performances for low risk and moderate for mortality in patients with COVID-19, with PSI being the best predictor for patients with pneumonia. 4C Mortality Score was a good predictior in all patients. There were no significant differences between the predictive performances of the scores in pre-omicron and omicron periods of the pandemic.

Zusammenfassung

Einführung

Verschiedene Scores wurden validiert, um die Mortalität einer ambulant erworbenen Pneumonie (CRB-65, CURB-65, PSI), Sepsis (qSOFA) und COVID-19 (4C Mortality Score) abzuschätzen. Die jeweilige Performance dieser Scores bei COVID-19 mit Pneumonie sowie der Einfluss der Omikronvariante auf diese bleibt zu untersuchen.

Methoden

Dies ist eine retrospektive Single-center-Studie, die die prognostische Vorhersagekraft verschiedener Scores insgesamt sowie auf die Phasen vor Omikron (03/2020–12/2021) mit der Omikronphase (01/2022–03/2023) bei Patienten vergleicht, die aufgrund von COVID-19 hospitalisiert worden sind.

Ergebnisse

Von insgesamt 622 Patienten hatten 348 (56,2%) eine Pneumonie. Die Mortalität lag bei insgesamt 16,2% (101 Patienten) mit deutlichem Unterschied zwischen den Phasen (71 (23,1% versus 30 (9,5%), p<0,001). Bei Patienten mit eine Pneumonie hatte der PSI eine signifikant bessere Vorhersagekraft im Vergleich zu CRB-65, CURB-65 und qSOFA (Unterschiede zwischen AUCs PSI vs CRB-65 0,066 (95%-KI 0,02–0,11, p=0,006); PSI vs CURB-65 0,047 (95%-KI 0–0,09, p=0,042); PSI vs qSOFA 0,124 (95%-KI 0,05–0,2, p=0,001). Der 4C Mortality Score zeigte eine ähnliche Vorhersagekraft. Es gab keinen Unterschied der Vorhersagekraft der einzelnen Scores zwischen den definierten Phasen, auch nicht nach Ausschluss der Patienten mit palliativem Therapieziel.

Schlussfolgerung

Alle Scores hatten eine gute Vorhersagekraft für niedrig bis moderates Mortalitätsrisiko bei hospitalisierten Patienten mit COVID-19, wobei der PSI der beste Prädiktor bei Patienten mit Pneumonie war. Der 4C Mortality Score war ein guter Prädiktor bei allen Patienten. Es gab keine signifikanten Unterschiede der Vorhersagekraft der Scores im Vergleich der Phasen der Pandemie.

Keywords

COVID-19 - pneumonia - mortality

Schlüsselwörter

COVID-19 - Pneumonie - Mortalität

Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 19. Dezember 2024

Angenommen nach Revision: 27. März 2025

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
06. Juni 2025

• References

• 1 Huang C, Wang Y, Li X. et al. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. Lancet 2020; 395: 497-506
• 2 Goyal P, Choi JJ, Pinheiro LC. et al. Clinical Characteristics of Covid-19 in New York City. N Engl J Med 2020; 382: 2372-2374
• 3 Yang X, Yu Y, Xu J. et al. Clinical course and outcomes of critically ill patients with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia in Wuhan, China: a single-centered, retrospective, observational study. Lancet Respir Med 2020; 8: 475-481
• 4 Robert Koch-Institut. Epidemiologischer Steckbrief zu SARS-CoV-2 und COVID-19 (December 2024). https://www.rki.de/DE/Content/InfAZ/N/Neuartiges_Coronavirus/Steckbrief.html
• 5 Gupta RK, Marks M, Samuels THA. UCLH COVID-19 Reporting Group. et al. Systematic evaluation and external validation of 22 prognostic models among hospitalised adults with COVID-19: an observational cohort study. Eur Respir J 2020; 56: 2003498
• 6 Bauer TT, Ewig S, Marre R. CAPNETZ Study Group. et al. CRB-65 predicts death from community-acquired pneumonia. J Intern Med 2006; 260: 93-101
• 7 Lim WS, van der Eerden MM, Laing R. et al. Defining community acquired pneumonia severity on presentation to hospital: an international derivation and validation study. Thorax 2003; 58: 377-382
• 8 Fine MJ, Auble TE, Yealy DM. et al. A prediction rule to identify low-risk patients with community-acquired pneumonia. N Engl J Med 1997; 336: 243-250
• 9 Seymour CW, Liu VX, Iwashyna TJ. et al. Assessment of Clinical Criteria for Sepsis: For the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA 2016; 315: 762-774
• 10 Knight SR, Ho A, Pius R. ISARIC4C investigators. et al. Risk stratification of patients admitted to hospital with covid-19 using the ISARIC WHO Clinical Characterisation Protocol: development and validation of the 4C Mortality Score. BMJ 2020; 370: m3339
• 11 Robert Koch-Institut. Epidemiologisches Bulletin (December 2024). https://www.rki.de/DE/Content/Infekt/EpidBull/Archiv/2022/Ausgaben/38_22.pdf?__blob=publicationFile
• 12 Auld SC, Harrington KRV, Adelman MW. et al. Emory COVID-19 Quality and Clinical Research Collaborative. Trends in ICU Mortality from Coronavirus Disease 2019: A Tale of Three Surges. Crit Care Med 2022; 50: 245-255
• 13 Grasselli G, Zanella A, Carlesso E. COVID-19 Lombardy ICU Network. et al. Association of COVID-19 Vaccinations With Intensive Care Unit Admissions and Outcome of Critically Ill Patients With COVID-19 Pneumonia in Lombardy, Italy. JAMA Netw Open 2022; 5: e2238871
• 14 Marrie TJ, Lau CY, Wheeler SL. et al. A controlled trial of a critical pathway for treatment of community-acquired pneumonia. CAPITAL Study Investigators. Community-Acquired Pneumonia Intervention Trial Assessing Levofloxacin. JAMA 2000; 283: 749-755
• 15 Renaud B, Coma E, Labarere J. Pneumocom Study Investigators. et al. Routine use of the Pneumonia Severity Index for guiding the site-of-treatment decision of patients with pneumonia in the emergency department: a multicenter, prospective, observational, controlled cohort study. Clin Infect Dis 2007; 44: 41-49
• 16 Carratalà J, Fernández-Sabé N, Ortega L. et al. Outpatient care compared with hospitalization for community-acquired pneumonia: a randomized trial in low-risk patients. Ann Intern Med 2005; 142: 165-172
• 17 Strehl JE, Ewig S, Schaaf B. Vergleich hospitalisierter Patienten mit SARS-CoV-2-Infektion in zwei Perioden der Pandemie [Comparison of hospitalized patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection in two time periods of the pandemic]. Pneumologie 2024; 78: 785-792
• 18 Modes ME, Directo MP, Melgar M. et al. Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes Among Adults Hospitalized with Laboratory-Confirmed SARS-CoV-2 Infection During Periods of B.1.617.2 (Delta) and B.1.1.529 (Omicron) Variant Predominance – One Hospital, California, July 15–September 23, 2021, and December 21, 2021–January 27, 2022. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2022; 71: 217-223
• 19 Liu A, Hammond R, Chan K. et al. Low CRB-65 Scores Effectively Rule out Adverse Clinical Outcomes in COVID-19 Irrespective of Chest Radiographic Abnormalities. Biomedicines 2023; 11: 2423
• 20 Alwazzeh MJ, Subbarayalu AV, Abu Ali BM. et al. Performance of CURB-65 and ISARIC 4C mortality scores for hospitalized patients with confirmed COVID-19 infection in Saudi Arabia. Inform Med Unlocked 2023; 39: 101269
• 21 Doğanay F, Ak R. Performance of the CURB-65, ISARIC-4C and COVID-GRAM scores in terms of severity for COVID-19 patients. Int J Clin Pract 2021; 75: e14759
• 22 Heydari F, Abbasi S, Shirani K. et al. Predictive performance of qSOFA in confirmed COVID-19 patients presenting to the emergency department. Tzu Chi Med J 2023; 35: 182-187
• 23 Ucan ES, Ozgen Alpaydin A, Ozuygur SS. DEU COVID Study Group. et al. Pneumonia severity indices predict prognosis in coronavirus disease-2019. Respir Med Res 2021; 79: 100826
• 24 Alencar J, Marina Gómez Gómez L, Cortez AL. et al. Performance of NEWS, qSOFA, and SIRS Scores for Assessing Mortality, Early Bacterial Infection, and Admission to ICU in COVID-19 Patients in the Emergency Department. Front Med (Lausanne) 2022; 9: 779516
• 25 Nikzad Jamnani A, Gholipour Baradari A, Kargar-Soleimanabad S. et al. Predictive performance of SOFA (Sequential Organ Failure Assessment) and qSOFA (quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment) for in-hospital mortality in ICU patients with COVID-19 of referral center in the north of Iran a retrospective study. Ann Med Surg (Lond) 2023; 85: 5414-5419
• 26 Jones A, Pitre T, Junek M. COREG Investigators. et al. External validation of the 4C mortality score among COVID-19 patients admitted to hospital in Ontario, Canada: a retrospective study. Sci Rep 2021; 11: 18638